<div class="quote"><i> <p>Drzhivago138 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Ultra chi ninja of imagination mk 2 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Googlydoe wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Ultra chi ninja of imagination mk 2 wrote: no it was real </p> </i></div>
<p>No it wasn't. It was Jaws. </p> <div class="floatright"></div> </div> <p>look it up i cannot put up the photo but it was in the movie </p> </div> You're probably thinking of this photo. <figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"> <figcaption> </figcaption></figure><p>It's a fake; a fan-edit made within the past year "for the lulz". Notice that the "Episode VII" font is the one used in various promo material for Episodes I and II. When BttFII came out in 1989, this font hadn't been invented yet. And absolutely no one had any idea until the day it happened that Disney would ever buy Lucasfilm. </p><p>Although I must ask: if you are so insistent that this was actually in the movie, why couldn't you provide the "evidence" yourself? </p> <div class="quote"><i> <p>Jessanna Stansu wrote: Yeah, if that's October 2015, we've got less then 11 months to have technology REALLY advance. </p> </i></div>
<p>Hey, weirder things have happened. A hoverboard much like the one in BttFII's 2015 now exists, and can be yours for a cool $10,000. </p> </div> <p>one i have not seen the movie in years so thanks for comfirming i was wrong (this is not a complaint on you i just glad i can stop giving out false knowledge) two i have noo clue why i could not post the image it just said error </p>

<p>Okay, fair enough. Sorry if I came across as too accusatory. </p> <div class="quote"><i> <p>Jessanna Stansu wrote: Maybe that's why I can never land a flying vehicle on LEGO Marvel Super Heroes without it blowing up. </p><p>I wouldn't want to ride in a flying car anyway. I already get carsick due to stomach issues (Long story, don't ask) and I'm afraid of heights. </p> </i></div>
<p>Similar situation here: I've only got one ear (on the inside), and your ears are what help balance you, so I get disoriented and carsick more easily than other people. But only if I'm in the back seat(s). </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Jessanna Stansu wrote: Maybe that's why I can never land a flying vehicle on LEGO Marvel Super Heroes without it blowing up. </p> </i></div>
<p>Ever tried landing a plane in GTA V? (I doubt it, I'm not meant to play the game myself.) It was almost <i>impossible</i> until the Flight School DLC was released. </p>

GTA V? I have no idea what that is...

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Jessanna Stansu wrote: GTA V? </p><p>I have no idea what that is... </p> </i></div>
<p>Grand Theft Auto Five? Most popular game of 2013 and 2014, despite the fact that it is R18+? Ring any bells? </p>

<p>On second thought, the more we talk about a game with such rating is for the worse, and Matau will probably say stop talking about it on this forum, so lets just stop now, hey? Save him the trouble. </p>

<p>Okay, I usually don't play many video games unless they're LEGO on the X-Box, anyway. More of an internet game fan. I can land on stuff in School of Dragons on my Deadly Nadder. It's just the part where the vehicle explodes in LMSH that messes up my landings. </p><p>On-topic, I wonder what the characters will look like in LEGO form. Oh, someone made a brick-ified version of the trailer with the audio, and it's hilarious! </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Jessanna Stansu wrote: Okay, I usually don't play many video games unless they're LEGO on the X-Box, anyway. More of an internet game fan. I can land on stuff in School of Dragons on my Deadly Nadder. It's just the part where the vehicle explodes in LMSH that messes up my landings. </p><p>On-topic, I wonder what the characters will look like in LEGO form. Oh, someone made a brick-ified version of the trailer with the audio, and it's hilarious! </p> </i></div>
<p>There are three, I think that the second one that comes up when searched 'lego star wars 7' is the best. </p>

<p>I'm starting to be conflicted about the upcoming Ep. VII sets. On one hand, I gotta get me some tie-in sets when the movie comes out. On the other hand, I haven't bought any new SW (or LEGO in general) since 2009; that was my last year before my "dark age". Now that I've got a little bit of money so I can afford sets, I've only been buying the old sets I had always wanted as a kid (Classic Star Wars, UFO, Exploriens, 2001 Bionicle, etc.) off Bricklink. I've even gone a step further and said I'm not going to buy SW made after 2009, since 2010 was the first year with white-pupiled minifigures, which don't have the charm of the original, simplistic faces, and I'm trying to be a completionist, and I don't have near the money to get every SW set since 1999...Why do I do these things to myself? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Drzhivago138 wrote: I'm starting to be conflicted about the upcoming Ep. VII sets. On one hand, I gotta get me some tie-in sets when the movie comes out. On the other hand, I haven't bought any new SW (or LEGO in general) since 2009; that was my last year before my "dark age". Now that I've got a little bit of money so I can afford sets, I've only been buying the old sets I had always wanted as a kid (Classic Star Wars, UFO, Exploriens, 2001 Bionicle, etc.) off Bricklink. I've even gone a step further and said I'm not going to buy SW made after 2009, since 2010 was the first year with white-pupiled minifigures, which don't have the charm of the original, simplistic faces, and I'm trying to be a completionist, and I don't have near the money to get every SW set since 1999...Why do I do these things to myself? </p> </i></div>
<p>Exploriens? That theme is quite literally older than me. Good luck collecting it all. And don't worry, you are not the only completionist out there. And I really have to find the correct term for 'completionist' or I'll ruin my own reputation. </p>