42,288
pages
ALL POSTSWolverine on box
<p>umm yea first off just because Wolverine is on the box DOES NOT mean he is in the set the reason why is because Hulk and Thor are on the box of 76017 Captain America vs. Hydra but they are not in the set and the exact opposite happens with 76018 Hulk Lab Smash where Cap, Hulk and Thor are on the box but only Hulk and Thor are in the set so unless you give me some proof i don't think that wolverine is in the set
</p>
(Edited by SmashingStar64)
No hes talking about the new Marvel sets and I like his logic but i cant tell till we get a bigger picture
(Edited by Nick.c.02)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Nick.c.02 wrote:
No hes talking about the new Marvel sets and I like his logic but i cant tell till we get a bigger picture
</p>
</i></div>
<p>I was talking about the new sets too. His logic states the picture mean that we get Hulk and Thor in a Captain America set due to the Avengers logo for the Avengers Assemble sets. Same principle. Applues to Avengers toys like a hulk action figure having the pic of the four Avengers but we dont get Iron Man or Thor with our hulk figure. Its tge 2012 logo stand.ing in gor the 2014 Wolverine. Logo </p>
<p>I was talking about the new sets too. His logic states the picture mean that we get Hulk and Thor in a Captain America set due to the Avengers logo for the Avengers Assemble sets. Same principle. Applues to Avengers toys like a hulk action figure having the pic of the four Avengers but we dont get Iron Man or Thor with our hulk figure. Its tge 2012 logo stand.ing in gor the 2014 Wolverine. Logo </p>
(Edited by Djgourhan)
We should just wait until we get a better picture.
(Edited by Psqidexslizer248)
no no no i was meaning like Cap not in 1 set but on the box and hulk and thor not in another set but on the box
(Edited by SmashingStar64)
<p>You really think Marvel merchandising would make an X-Men set without Wolverine? They can't even make a movie without at least a cameo.
</p>
(Edited by SpiVenger)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>SpiVenger wrote:
You really think Marvel merchandising would make an X-Men set without Wolverine? They can't even make a movie without at least a cameo.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>The logic is good, but logic doesn't equal proof. </p>
<p>The logic is good, but logic doesn't equal proof. </p>
(Edited by Stormjay Rider)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>ErkelonJay wrote:
</p>
<div class="quote">
<p>SpiVenger wrote:
You really think Marvel merchandising would make an X-Men set without Wolverine? They can't even make a movie without at least a cameo.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>The logic is good, but logic doesn't equal proof. </p> </div> <p>Touché </p>
<p>The logic is good, but logic doesn't equal proof. </p> </div> <p>Touché </p>
(Edited by SpiVenger)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>SpiVenger wrote:
You really think Marvel merchandising would make an X-Men set without Wolverine? They can't even make a movie without at least a cameo.
</p>
</i></div>
<p>I agree, and I would be astounded if Wolverine wasn't in that set. I hope he gets mask, though! </p>
<p>I agree, and I would be astounded if Wolverine wasn't in that set. I hope he gets mask, though! </p>
(Edited by JTH Studios)
I don't think that a mask would look good. Wolverine with a mask in LEGO Marvel Super Hero's looks kinda weird.
(Edited by Ctburton712)
<p>The mask is weird, but it'll be good for a Hawkgirl custom. :P I already have the Wolverine from 6866, so I'm looking forward to another variation.
</p>
(Edited by Berrybrick)