41,194
pages
ALL POSTSNew admins - Nominations
<p>Okay, things have been calm since the split (or mostly so) so I'd like to start off the process of deciding on new admins
</p><p>The process is going to be very different from the usual system here, but the aim is the same: to find the right people to look after and grow this wikia
</p><p>There will be two stages. The first is to nominate people you think would be good admins here; the second is a vote for those nominees, and decide who should be your new admins
</p><p>The nomination stage will run from today until Monday March 3rd. Then the voting stage will be one week, starting on Tuesday March 4th.
</p><p>Because of the current situation on the wiki, votes from those not active on this wiki will be discounted. And, again because of the special circumstances of this vote, staff will have a veto on any candidates.
</p><p>And here's the most controversial bit: those who are admins on the fork will not be eligible for nomination. This wiki needs its own admins, who are focused on making this the best LEGO wiki in existence. It's not possible for someone to do that for two wikis, so no Brickimedia admins please.
</p><p>Please do not use this thread to discuss the voting process or the situation on the wiki, this page is for nominations only.
</p><p>So please add your nominations below!
</p>
(Edited by Sannse)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Sannse wrote:
Stormjay Rider: I didn't forget, but as I said, this special circumstance means changing that process for a while.
</p><p>All: I would love to see more nominations that aren't self-nominations... who do you trust and respect most of the people who remain active on this wiki?
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Another point, I think that doing it on a wiki page will purge the users that don't have the skills to be an administrator (wikicode and such) so they won't be a bother on the requests. </p>
<p>Another point, I think that doing it on a wiki page will purge the users that don't have the skills to be an administrator (wikicode and such) so they won't be a bother on the requests. </p>
(Edited by Stormjay Rider)
<p>I am an Admin on another wiki, but please do not choose me.
</p>
(Edited by Lucianvesper11)
<p>Toamatau asked me if I wanted to be an admin. If the admin standards sound fair and simple, then I will accept.
</p>
(Edited by Saburo954)
choose emmet as lego mascot
(Edited by Debestdwarfever)
2
I'd be OK with ToaMatau and Saburo.
(Edited by C886553)
AnthonyGuy as admin
(Edited by AnthonyGuy)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Debestdwarfever wrote:
choose emmet as lego mascot
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Wrong comment thread. </p>
<p>Wrong comment thread. </p>
(Edited by Stormjay Rider)
I nominate Saburo954 for admin.
(Edited by ToaMatau2004)
<p>I nominate Saburo954 too. It looks like he has been making good edits. :)
</p>
(Edited by PotatoRobot)
<div class="quote"><i>
<p>Sannse wrote:
Stormjay Rider: I didn't forget, but as I said, this special circumstance means changing that process for a while.
</p><p>All: I would love to see more nominations that aren't self-nominations... who do you trust and respect most of the people who remain active on this wiki?
</p>
</i></div>
<p>Who do I trust and respect the most? None of these newer users. They don't have enough experience. I think you might want to consider giving the rights back to the admins and let them settle the situation - if only for a day. It'll be like cleaning our house before we give it away. This is a reasonable request (in my opinion), so if you deny it, please address why. </p>
<p>Who do I trust and respect the most? None of these newer users. They don't have enough experience. I think you might want to consider giving the rights back to the admins and let them settle the situation - if only for a day. It'll be like cleaning our house before we give it away. This is a reasonable request (in my opinion), so if you deny it, please address why. </p>
(Edited by LazerzSoH)