<p>I have read up on this season ahead of time. The sources that I have read said that this was the last season of ninjago. I have a few things to say, first, Lloyd absorbed his fathers energy\life force, second, WHY IN THE NAME IS COLE STILL THERE!? I MEAN COLE IS A GHOST NOW AND SHOULD HAVE GONE WITH THE OTHER GHOSTS, AND DIED WITH THE PREMENENT. *SIGH* Kid lodgic I guess. (It does make a bit of sense since Cole cannot die because he is a protaganist,BUT IT STILL DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE). Everyone here is a guy right? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>AsunaZoroark wrote: I have read up on this season ahead of time. The sources that I have read said that this was the last season of ninjago. I have a few things to say, first, Lloyd absorbed his fathers energy\life force, second, WHY IN THE NAME IS COLE STILL THERE!? I MEAN COLE IS A GHOST NOW AND SHOULD HAVE GONE WITH THE OTHER GHOSTS, AND DIED WITH THE PREMENENT. *SIGH* Kid lodgic I guess. (It does make a bit of sense since Cole cannot die because he is a protaganist,BUT IT STILL DOES NOT MAKE ANY SENSE). Everyone here is a guy right? </p> </i></div>
<p>Assuming that everyone here is a 'guy' is quite sexist. Ninjago is not a theme limited to male collectors, and anyone can like whatever they want. Anyway, this is not the last season of Ninjago, it was revealed at SDCC that there will be a Season 6 next year (presumably). And the thing about Lloyd absorbing his father's energy would not make sense. The only reason that Lloyd emerged from the Cursed Realm with his father's robe is that Garmadon saw fit that Lloyd was now wise enough to become a Sensei. Cole is still around because he was not <i>cursed</i>, he was only turned into a ghost, although there are many plot holes as when Nya unlocked her True Potential, water was sprayed everywhere... </p>

<p>I think the set pictures weren't fake, but prototype sets. Since in America, the ghost sets haven't even been released yet, they will probably not release the new Ninjago sets til 2016, and the sets are probably still being fully designed. Also, if you look at the second YouTube link The True Pokemon master showed, the ninja in the animation resembled Lloyd's design in the set. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>NicMasterOfWater wrote: I think the set pictures weren't fake, but prototype sets. Since in America, the ghost sets haven't even been released yet, they will probably not release the new Ninjago sets til 2016, and the sets are probably still being fully designed. Also, if you look at the second YouTube link The True Pokemon master showed, the ninja in the animation resembled Lloyd's design in the set. </p> </i></div>
<p>I'm pretty sure those are fake. The prototype images of the ToE wave that I have are far more accurate, with proper boxes. The confidential stamp is also applied incorrectly, with the writing clearly unofficial. I'll give you an example of a proper prototype. </p> <figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px"> <figcaption> </figcaption></figure>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Mr.reporter wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bIZ1fOGGw </p> </i></div>
<p>This is fake. Here is why. </p>

• Confidential watermark is in the wrong spot and is in the wrong font.
• Mini-figures are clearer than the set.
• Jay's torso is a reversed ZX print.
• 2009 pirate is used. If it was real, a 2015 one would be used.
• Set names usually come before images.
• Box is too plain.
• What is that background?
• Box is missing side printing.
• Box seems computer generated. Real ones look real.
• Set is too simple.
• Too early for leaks.

<div class="quote"><i> <p>ToaMatau2004 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Mr.reporter wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bIZ1fOGGw </p> </i></div>
<p>This is fake. Here is why. </p>

• Confidential watermark is in the wrong spot and is in the wrong font.
• Mini-figures are clearer than the set.
• Jay's torso is a reversed ZX print.
• 2009 pirate is used. If it was real, a 2015 one would be used.
• Set names usually come before images.
• Box is too plain.
• What is that background?
• Box is missing side printing.
• Box seems computer generated. Real ones look real.
• Set is too simple.
• Too early for leaks.

</div> <p>Yup, pretty much nailed it. :) </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Ninja of Fire wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>ToaMatau2004 wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Mr.reporter wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bIZ1fOGGw </p> </i></div>
<p>This is fake. Here is why. </p>

• Confidential watermark is in the wrong spot and is in the wrong font.
• Mini-figures are clearer than the set.
• Jay's torso is a reversed ZX print.
• 2009 pirate is used. If it was real, a 2015 one would be used.
• Set names usually come before images.
• Box is too plain.
• What is that background?
• Box is missing side printing.
• Box seems computer generated. Real ones look real.
• Set is too simple.
• Too early for leaks.

</div> <p>Yup, pretty much nailed it. :) </p> </div> <p>100% true. </p>

<p>Well, we do know that there will be Ninjago next year, because a Ninjago movie is confirmed for September 2016. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Surtatb2007 wrote: Well, we do know that there will be Ninjago next year, because a Ninjago movie is confirmed for September 2016. </p> </i></div>
<p>Wasn't it moved for 2017?? :/ </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Predacon Blazer wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>Surtatb2007 wrote: Well, we do know that there will be Ninjago next year, because a Ninjago movie is confirmed for September 2016. </p> </i></div>
<p>Wasn't it moved for 2017?? :/ </p> </div> <p>What? Source? </p>