All posts by BobaFett2

<p>Also for bad: Jack Stone, Town Jr./City Centre. </p>

<p>World Racers is fine was a theme. </p><p>BIONICLE, Studios, and Adventurers are some of the best. </p><p>Also, if it's nonfiction, you shouldn't be making value judgments. </p>

We could open a Brickimedia Games wiki and advertise them there.

<div class="quote"><i> <p>GeorgeBarnick wrote: </p> <div class="quote"> <p>BobaFett2 wrote: The reimbursement would be in the form of contest prizes, which could help attract some users - especially if you limit contests to editors. </p><p>Also, are we advertising anyone else? Perhaps Brickpicker would like to? </p> </i></div>
<p>Wait, I don't understand. We're supposed to buy the contest prizes and have that be our reimbursement? That doesn't work... </p> </div> <p>No. We wouldn't be paying - our reimbursement would be contest prizes. </p>

<p>The reimbursement would be in the form of contest prizes, which could help attract some users - especially if you limit contests to editors. </p><p>Also, are we advertising anyone else? Perhaps Brickpicker would like to? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>GeorgeBarnick wrote: Who's paying for the prizes? And what are they getting in return for paying for them? Surely whoever is paying for them needs to be reimbursed somehow. </p> </i></div>
<p>It appears that we would be paying by advertising him. </p>

I suggest not overtaxing him with requests. I think one a month or one every other month is more than enough.

<p>Only for contests sponsored by the administrators which receive a certain number of entries. Anything more than that would be frivolous and would result in far too many requests for things from him. </p><p>At the moment, the only contest I think qualifies is the Interwiki LEGO contest. </p>

<p>No, it's pointless because it will never work, at least not at this point. Yes, the characters may well be in there, but he's asking a gaming company to model, animate, texture, and code new characters and integrate them into a game...less than 20 days before the release date. As someone who is working with people doing just that sort of thing, I assure you that it requires a lot of time to do things properly. </p>

<p>We're saying that the petition is pointless, not that the characters won't be in game. </p>

It's "Petition" and they're not going to add characters at this point.

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Darth henry wrote: That is what I mean. I will give any CUUSOO profits, but nothing else. </p> </i></div>
<p>That's like saying that if you win the lottery, you'll give the money to Brickimedia, except that your chances are even more slim. </p>

<p>...but CUUSOO profits are ridiculously unlikely to come to you. </p><p>It's like promising to donate money if you win the lottery. </p>

<p>CUUSOO isn't a great way to fund a project. It's hard enough to get a project to 10,000, especially if you don't just build a license, and once it reaches 10,000, it's still very unlikely that it will be chosen. </p><p>I still think that merchandising might work. That said, I have no idea how popular Brickipedia is. </p>

<p>Then you weren't there when he first came. </p><p>I don't like chat, personally. We did fine without it. That said, it probably HAS attracted a few editors. As for voting, polls allow the users who ruined it for everyone to vote anonymously and then let anyone log off and vote again (I think?). Voting should be announced throughout the wiki and done in a forum. </p>

Well said. I think I predicted it after Lego lord came.

<p>If the logo is as close to the actual one on the site/catalogs/etc... and you're not allowed to, for some reason or another, get that logo, it makes sense to me. </p><p>Otherwise (if the official logo has not yet been revealed/does not exist/can be used legally on this site) then I agree with Jeyo. </p>