34,875 Pages

Articles for Scrap - Proposed Mergers - Proposed Splits - Proposed Name Changes

Articles for Scrap is where nominations for pages in need of deletion can be placed.

Before proposing an article for deletion, consider marking it with a maintenance tag instead or propose an article merger.

Note: "Vandal pages" should be marked with {{Speedydelete}}, and do not need to be discussed here. If you are unsure whether a page should be speedy deleted or not, then nominate it for deletion here and an Administrator will see if it is worth of speedy deletion.

Instructions for use

To leave a nomination, click here and replace Article Name with the name of the article that you think should be deleted. Under the Delete header, type the reason why you think the article should be deleted, and then sign your name with ~~~~. Also, please leave {{delete}} on the nominated page. Voting will take place for two weeks to determine if the page should be deleted.



Is this official? ~ CJC 16:32, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

LEGO World Netherlands --EyeExist (talk) 17:29, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean with: "Is this official?" You suggest this event is not approved by LEGO? This is the largest LEGO event in the world, with official LEGO stands, for more than 10 years now. Please be aware LEGO Club is present, all major LEGO fan clubs, the LEGO Service representatives and even the builders from LEGO Denmark are behind the counter. I think you can still visit it for the coming days if you want to. Also please take a look at the website. --MeJo (talk) 22:08, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

What I think CJC means is "Is this event organized by the LEGO Group?". -Cligra Join the redlink war!
^ - if it is not official LEGO event, it doesn't matter how many people are there, it is still unofficial. ~ CJC 16:18, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Keep,I heard about it on the newspaper. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring

  • ...So every time something - such as a custom - is mentioned in the press, we should have an article? I think the Metro or The Sun mentioned the LEGO Felix skyjumper thing, so should we have one for that? ~ CJC 16:18, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete if it's an unofficial event. Or, move to the custom namespace and have a section for fan events. The mainspace should be dealing with official content only, not stuff like this. For this reason, I'm also not sure why we have James May... NightblazeSaber 22:39, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • James May things can just go in the references in culture page. ~ CJC 08:08, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

So I should get in contact with LEGO Group, to ask whether they consider this event as 'an official LEGO event'? If so, the page stays as is, if not, the page moves to a special page for LEGO events? --MeJo (talk) 13:17, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

How about LEGO World Denmark Contacts They all have addresses in their mail. Looks pretty official to me. Also in 2013 there will be 14 tons of LEGO and more than 250 models. Must come from LEGO.--EyeExist (talk) 21:03, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

I think it is official, I believe it was on aswell. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring

Part 76382

Should be deleted per Brickipedia:Forum/An even newer parts numbering system, or at the very least be turned into a page for blank torsos with the same coloured arms and hands.


  • Delete, as nominator. --Berrybrick (Talk) 11:32, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep, per my "master page" idea on the forum. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:54, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose deletion, oppose putting every single variant on one page. ~ CJC 20:21, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep, all the Torsos have the same Design ID, that is what all the Legs, Heads, Helmets, and everything else is. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  • i know we all have different ideas, but i think we should go with Jeyo's Idea a bit, but have the Inventory pages go to Part 76382, then they link to there different torso page, idk how it will work Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Flick-Fire Missiles

(deletion suggested on talk page)

  • Neutral, leaning towards keep. I don't see how it'd hurt, it's widely used, and a weapon of more than one piece (we have lightsaber and a lot of Chima weapon pages). NightblazeSaber 03:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. They have, perhaps not so fortunately, become an important aspect of LEGO's general design process. :P -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  • Delete No need for such a page - if we are going to do this, we may as well list every other feature LEGO has ever made. - Czech
  • Per NBS. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:01, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Not needed. --Toa Matau Le-Metru 23:35, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Changing my vote to 'keep, per my reason above. NightblazeSaber 23:49, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep I created the page for a reason :) BrikkyyTalk Extras!
  • Keep per NBS. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:49, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete It really is not needed, other wise we might as well make a catapults or cockpits page.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man! Legospidey 55:40, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
    • But flickfires (as much as I hate them) have become part of LEGO's individuality. All of LEGO's rip-offs have cockpits and catapults.
    • 1. They are in a lot of sets because they are one of the better play features (at least function-wise anyways) 2. This is a LEGO wiki. I was making a example.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man! Legospidey
  • Keep just needs work Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Some LOTR stuff

Okay. This is getting ridiculous. Can we just have articles on the playable characters in the game? I don't know who those are, so somebody else will have to mark them, but really? Is that notable at all? --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:52, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

  • Support. This was the reason I made a lot of that work on the LotR pages. The pages that ought to be deleted include

Hobbit, Cirdan, Aldor, Great Beast, and Moth. These are all cutscene only, sans Hobbit. Jay

Thanks, but if the Hobbit can be interacted with in some way, then we should keep it. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:28, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, he can. (same reason that Possessed Theoden is still on the page, he's a boss character.) But that should mean pages for "Man", "Elf", and "Dwarf". Jay

  • Deleted all but "Hobbit" (should it be moved to Unidentified Hobbit?) as per the deleting cutscene only characters policy NightblazeSaber 00:41, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • I think "hobbit (LotR the videogame)" would be appropriate, because he is "identified." Jay
      • As who exactly? NightblazeSaber 22:51, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
        • As a hobbit, in need of a trowel (or soup pot, or stop wand, or sun hat, etc...) Jay
          • Well that's not his name :S NightblazeSaber 00:06, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
            • Just leave him at hobbit. Jay
  • @Berrybrick, I don't know if you can say he can be interacted with, he's just an invincible computer character on a pig who doesn't really do much. NightblazeSaber 22:51, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
    • Who is this? Jay
      • Actually, I don't have a clue what this page is even meant to be on now- I thought it was the guy riding around on the pig (as seen in the gallery), yet the infobox image is of a completely different person NightblazeSaber 00:06, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Republic Frigate (Disambiguation)

Requested for deletion by ErkelonJay.

  • Keep. I don't see what harm it's doing. There's more than one Republic Frigate model, that's when we need a disambig page... NightblazeSaber 02:04, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I thought I removed that notice. ^ :P --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:09, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • One's an advent only model. Who feels like making disambigs for all the other advent models? --{{SUBST:User:ErkelonJay/sig}} (talk) 22:03, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
    • That probably wouldn't be that many. Probably somewhere around 50 pages to create/update. Just because some people don't want to make them doesn't mean we shouldn't have them. --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:38, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

21020 BT Tower

What would you say the odds are of it being an AFD joke?

June 23

Why it should be deleted.



  • Delete, as nominator.

What Brickipedia is not

Why it should be deleted.

  • Brickipedia referred to as "Blobbypedia"
  • Unfactual
  • Vandalized


  • Delete, as nominator.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.