Nomination comments: Me and several users have fixed the formatting, spelling, and grammar and added a Description, Background, and Notes section, all of which are fairly well developed. Also, the page has a picture, which is apparently also needed for an article to be Class 3.
Nomination comments: added appearance section to some already good existing content
^ Oops, I just marked as done (editconflict, sorry). These are the only two appearances that the minifigure makes (see Wookiee Warrior). I also did a cleanup, so the infobox is better filled out and made some minor fixes. If you still feel it shouldn't be c2, please change it back (as I said, it was just bad timing, I wasn't overruling you or anything) NightblazeSaber 23:06, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
Oh don't worry. It was just at that time I didn't feel it was. Good work though. :D klagoername that user 23:10, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: This article isn't exactly complete yet, but I've done some work on it in order to clean it up. It certainly could do with fixing of rough edges, but I feel as if it has come far enough to be a Class 3 article.
Nomination comments: I worked hard on this article recently, especially on the description and background information. Actually, I think its now even good enough to be a class 2 article, but I'll leave that decision up to you.
Done. I'd say it's very close to C2, if it described the set itself instead of solely comparing it with other sets I'd give it C2 NightblazeSaber 10:08, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination Comments: Well I figured, because the Hulk article is rated 3 and the SH article has more info then that.
Not Done. It's naturally going to have more information than Hulk; not a good reason. Lacks a description, and I think that the Marvel minifigure gallery has CGI photos. --Berrybrick(Talk) 11:10, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Lately, I worked very hard on this article, did the description and background pretty much all by myself. I've also made sure for it not to be with US spelling.
Not Done. Because it's worthy of Class 2 :D Just give me a second to fix up a couple of minor things. Great work :) NightblazeSaber 12:17, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
Good thing too, I thought it might qualify as a C2 article, but I thought I should nominate it as a C3 article first, just to make sure :P. - Power Jim Talk Blogz12:31, 4/24/2012 12:31, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
Not Done. No description at all, I think at least some sort of description should be present to be c3- that is what should be the focus of the article after all. NightblazeSaber 00:02, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
Done a Description section. Hope it helps. -- Sir Penguin! 00:06, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I have added a Background for It. I hope It is better than c4.
Not going to say no, but description should be above the background, and the description needs its spelling checked. Might qualify for c3, I don't know, but definitely not c2. NightblazeSaber 08:03, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
Well, it's entirely up to you, but usually people have a slightly better track record than you currently have with nominating articles for their noms to be successful NightblazeSaber 08:29, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
Nominated by:Chargetalk Go Briki! 02:43, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: The article has a good description and I feel it's worth of Class 3.
Done. After having a read over and changing a few things, I have marked this as class 3. Just a few comments for next time; 'many things' is somewhat subjective, and should be changed. There is no need to mention the name of the article in the description, also. Jag 02:48, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
I've looked at the page, and I think it's good as a c4. Doesn't seem to be Class 3 material, in my opinion. However, if there's a more detailed description of the set than just a sentence or two, I might reconsider. So, for now...
Not Done. Needs the articles with red links created first. SKP4472 Talk 13,998 Edits!Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 16:48, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
I thought FA must have all red links filled out and Class 1 has limited. There is no such rule for the red lins listed on the Class 3 guidelines. Per comments stated in the archives. •myk 19:33, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
Well, although it has a nice background section, I think it still needs a description of the minifigure itself in order for it to be considered c3. For example, like variants, whether it's flesh colored or yellow. So, for now...
The 10195 Republic Dropship with AT-OT Walker article is currently Class 4. Since it has good infobox, general information, description, and gallery sections, I think it should be elevated to Class 3. Since I own the set, I hope to do some work on the article soon, and hopefully elevate it to Good Article status. tradeylouish (talk|contribs) 20:42, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
Done. Definitely belongs at Class 3. Congratulations on being the first to use this system :) NightblazeSaber 23:15, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
Nominated by:UltrasonicNXT - nxt 19:50, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Have expanded it quite a bit. It has every thing relevent on the MoS. There is not much more that can be done. It meets the class 3 standards (I think) so should be moved up. (Slightly off topic, but can we include pictures of the minifigure from the film, if they have appropriate copyright status?)
Nomination comments: I'm am NOT nominating this because I like the game. I have worked on this article quite a bit, and there is a lot of info in it for having an entire seperate wiki about it. I think that there isn't much more that anyone can do to make it perfect.
Done. Seems good enough to me. Thanks for improving this article massively. SKP4472 Talk 13,998 Edits!Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 16:48, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Upgrade. Skdhjf(Talk!) 05:19, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Done.NightblazeSaber 08:12, April 23, 2011 (UTC) (note: to other QCG members: if you do want to kick me from the group, please do and just let me know, I can completely understand since I'm not really here anymore)
Okay, I've looked at it and I'm sorry, but it's not done. That description hardly describes the minifigure. Also, I believe this minifigure also makes an appearance in a video game. Is it possible to include facts about the minifigure's appearance in the video game, such as abilities and such? For example, you could refer to Luminara Unduli. Sure, the description for Blackbeard doesn't have to be that detailed for Class 3, but at least it could include a detailed description .(For example:One of Blackbeard's accessorys is the Sword of Triton, which is yellow and grey with a decorative hilt) Oh, don't copy this line into the article- I just made that stuff up to illustrate a point. =P
Aww...I'm torn. In my opinion, it isn't exactly Class 3 material, but it's still not exactly Class 4... Oh well, I designate it as Class 4, since there's limited info. Byzantium 3000!8,856 edits! 02:31, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I have done my best to improve the overall quality of the page, including fixing minor spelling and grammatical errors, as well as adding clearer descriptions of the set and what is included in it.
Nomination comments: This article contains description on the character's history, traits, and team. It includes notes, references, Official Lego.com description, and enough gallery pics to show the character. This article could use some work (as most could), but I don't think that it should be a Class-4 article.
No description of the set itself. To me, very borderline, I'll leave it to someone else to decide. NightblazeSaber 03:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Not Done. It needs a description. --Berrybrick(Talk) 17:23, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I think it's more than a class 4 page.
Not Done. We don't have an MoS for this sort of article, so I don't know what to base it on. I think that even though it goes over the story well, it at least needs a section on cast and/or characters. --Berrybrick(Talk) 17:09, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments: I have added two pictures, a part infobox, and "appearances" and "description" sections. The "appearances" is still incomplete and the set lacks a part ID, but apart from that it's complete. That's worthy of C3.
Not Done. Shouldn't it have a generic infobox or even a minifigure one instead of one for a part article? I also don't want to give it C3 without a complete list of appearances. --Berrybrick(Talk) 18:22, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
Nomination comments:Spinjitzu Smash!, another Class 5 article I edited, was upgraded to Class 3 after my edit, and I did a similar thing for Spinjitzu Smash DX. The page still needs some work - it has no pictures and only one section - but I think it's still okay.
Not Done. I know that it has been taken down from LEGO.com, but I think it needs a picture at least. The content seems good though. --Berrybrick(Talk) 01:00, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
Not Done. 4 maybe. Not 3 though. Could at the very least do with a picture, and a new episode MoS has come into effect, you may want to look at that (when I get the time to add it in to BP:MOSNightblazeSaber 08:31, September 6, 2012 (UTC)