Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
;Technical MoS check (QCG members only) |
;Technical MoS check (QCG members only) |
||
* Minifigure gallery needs to be cleaned up- two of the clone troopers are depicted with incorrect accessories- two should have [[Part x1741|rifles]]. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC) |
* Minifigure gallery needs to be cleaned up- two of the clone troopers are depicted with incorrect accessories- two should have [[Part x1741|rifles]]. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | * Uncaptioned images |
+ | <s>* Uncaptioned images |
* Unecessary images in gallery, which already appear in the article |
* Unecessary images in gallery, which already appear in the article |
||
* Bolding in background |
* Bolding in background |
||
− | : {{RG}} {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | : {{RG}} {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)</s> |
** Minifigures in gallery replaced with accessory-neutral ones Brickset and Bricklink use. |
** Minifigures in gallery replaced with accessory-neutral ones Brickset and Bricklink use. |
||
** Images captioned and removed |
** Images captioned and removed |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
{{RG}} {{User:Cligra/Sig}} |
{{RG}} {{User:Cligra/Sig}} |
||
;Comments |
;Comments |
||
− | * Also a bit unsure as to why there's a "see also" for LAAT's- this set contains an LAAT/c, not an LAAT/i. It would be like having a "see also" list on the Z-95 set page listing all of the X-wing sets. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | <s>* Also a bit unsure as to why there's a "see also" for LAAT's- this set contains an LAAT/c, not an LAAT/i. It would be like having a "see also" list on the Z-95 set page listing all of the X-wing sets. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)</s> |
Revision as of 22:58, 8 September 2012
Featured articles • Featured Article Nominations
Class 1 Articles • Class 1 Nominations
Class 2 Articles • Class 2 (future) articles • Class 2 Nominations
Class 3 Articles • Class 3 Nominations
Class 4 Articles • Class 4 Nominations
Content Improvement • Articles for Rating
Quality Check Group • QCG Member Requests
Here, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs). The Featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Brickipedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favourite themes, minifigures, etc. or to get praise for your "hard work" on an article. |
A featured article must...
How to nominate:
How to vote:
Also remember to add {{FANom}} at the top of the article you are nominating. Every month the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the {{featured}} template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the {{featured article}} template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list. |
Nominations
10215 Obi-Wan's Jedi Starfighter
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
- Nomination comments: It is in excellent condition, with large description and background sections, a notes section and several external links.
Vote score: -2, Technical Check: Currently Not OK
- Support
- Object
- I think it could qualify as a low-tier C1, but definitely not an FA IMO. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
- (This is tangible, right?) Unfortunately, per Cligra. --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:08, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
- I would regard it as a C1 but not an FA, sorry.
SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Welcome to Click a Brick! 16:36, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
- Had a few small statements in the description which weren't a neutral POV
- they are large and tubular, ending in blue "fire". doesn't quite sound right. Plus it needs capitalization. Jag 04:47, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Comments
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
- The qualifications for C1 are actually the same as FA, FA are just better I guess. --Berrybrick (Talk) 13:37, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
10195 Republic Dropship with AT-OT
- Nominated by:Jurassic park787 Vittoria per gli Assassini! 22:01, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I wonder how it has not won FA. It is argueably the best Class 1 non-FA out there. It has a very well written description, a lot of good grammer and spelling, and quite a bit of high quality photos. (Sorry for ANOTHER Star Wars FA nomination)
- Support
- I'm willing to give this one a go. It's got a decent description and background and (without actually reading it- I'll get to that later :P) looks like quite a good article. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
Power Jim Talk Blogz07:24, 9/8/2012 07:24, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Object
- Technical MoS check (QCG members only)
- Minifigure gallery needs to be cleaned up- two of the clone troopers are depicted with incorrect accessories- two should have rifles. NightblazeSaber 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
* Uncaptioned images
- Unecessary images in gallery, which already appear in the article
- Bolding in background
NightblazeSaber 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Minifigures in gallery replaced with accessory-neutral ones Brickset and Bricklink use.
- Images captioned and removed
- I have no idea what you mean by "bolding in background, sorry :S
- I'm taking your word for this, but See Also section removed.
- Comments
* Also a bit unsure as to why there's a "see also" for LAAT's- this set contains an LAAT/c, not an LAAT/i. It would be like having a "see also" list on the Z-95 set page listing all of the X-wing sets. NightblazeSaber 10:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)