No edit summary |
(re) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:'''Support'''. [[User:MsD|<b><font color=#FF0000>MsD</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:MsD|<b><font color=#FF00FF>talk</font></b>]]</sup> 22:10, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
:'''Support'''. [[User:MsD|<b><font color=#FF0000>MsD</font></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:MsD|<b><font color=#FF00FF>talk</font></b>]]</sup> 22:10, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :'''Oppose'''. Look how the voting is at the moment- it's very easy to see 4 supports, 1 oppose. You try to have a forum like this, and it's 50 pages long (or would be if there was decent pagination and not one huge page) and it takes ages to figure what the current consensus is. {{User:NovaFlare/sig}} 23:25, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Perhaps we could do a highlighted Special:Forum to announce a Brickipedia:Forum, and have the voting there? :P Because there certainly is an issue with having these get attention. [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 23:28, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Fair enough, I assume that the oppose (and to be honest, all the supports) are only at the first point? ~ [[User talk:CJC95|CJC]] 23:33, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::Definite yes to two weeks and then closing. I would be OK with further regimenting it to having all RfAs and forums starting on the first or 15th of the month, and closing on the 15th or last day. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] <small>([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|Talk]])</small> 23:39, September 5, 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:39, 5 September 2013
Forums - Forum
I'd also like to propose that other than in exceptional circumstances, forums should be closed and a valid conclusion posted within two weeks. I'd also like to suggest we rework all the rules that are written and not written (the ones we've just sorta accepted as norm) into one place that allows us to easily update the rules and explain them to new users. ~ CJC 22:02, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
|