(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
** Featured customs are just "good" customs that have awesome designs that people like. :P |
** Featured customs are just "good" customs that have awesome designs that people like. :P |
||
{{User:Jeyo/sig}} 23:22, November 22, 2012 (UTC) |
{{User:Jeyo/sig}} 23:22, November 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ==Other Names== |
||
− | * Do we want to bother with other names for these groups (like Crown Knights)? Only thing is, they'll need their own logos, so for that reason maybe it would be worth doing? {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 22:22, November 21, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | :* I can't find the old forum with a bunch of ideas for other QCG names, but I think that if we were to choose names they should be relative to classic themes. Space and either Pirates or Town/City, I think. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 20:44, November 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | :The edited list is here: |
||
− | |||
− | *Alpha Team
|
||
− |
*Crusaders |
||
− |
*Drones |
||
− | *Good Wizards |
||
− |
*Henchmen |
||
− | *Royal Knights
|
||
− | *Turaga |
||
− | *Dragon Knights |
||
− | *Fixer Uppers |
||
− | *Zombie Lords |
||
− | |||
− | {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:32, November 23, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | * Just some other ideas: |
||
− | ** Galaxy Squad |
||
− | ** The Fellowship |
||
⚫ | |||
− | :: I'd oppose Fellowship for being a licensed faction. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 23:20, November 29, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | :: @NBS: If we do that, I'm all for The Shadow Knights. :P {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 06:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ==Votes for names== |
||
− | * If you have other ideas, please add them to ''both'' lists (if appropriate for both). |
||
− | ===CQM=== |
||
− | ====Alpha Team
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
⚫ | |||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Crusaders
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # I just think it'd be nice to have other Castle factions to kinda go with the existing Crown Knights, like being the same sort of thing, but different. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # I don't want to be called Crusaders for historical reasons - Crusaders were people who attacked people in their own land for being a different religeon. This is NOT what this group should be called. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:00, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per Czech. I don't know what LEGO was thinking naming a faction that. :/ {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:23, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # ^ {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Drones
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # I don't like the idea of a group of "drones", even if they are ogel's Drones. :P {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 23:08, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Fellowship
(-3)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Don't really want to see a licensed theme as a name for a user group {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per NBS {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:23, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per NBS {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:53, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per NBS {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Good Wizards
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not too fond of the name. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Galaxy Squad (+2)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
⚫ | |||
− | # Actually, on thinking about it I get what you mean Czech, and one Castle, one City, one Space could work well. I support either both Castle, or both different (not one Castle, one different) {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 20:30, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 23:19, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Henchmen
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Royal Knights
(+1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Per Crusaders support {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per NBS on Crusaders, except this one doesn't have a religious meaning. No more than Crown Knights, at least. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:24, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # ^ {{User:Klagoer/sig}} 23:05, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Per other opposes --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:11, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Turaga
(-2)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Per Fellowship oppose {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | #: But it isn't a licensed name.... {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:25, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Dragon Knights
(+2)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Per Crusaders support. Would support Royal Knights and Dragon Knights moreso than the Crusaders. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per what I said about Royal Knights. {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:25, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Fixer Uppers
(-5)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not really LEGO related (it doesn't have to be, I'd just rather it to be, hence the oppose) {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # We aren't really fixing anything.... {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 15:25, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:53, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Darth henry/Sig}} 19:34, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Per NBS {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | * Request to eliminate this option? {{C|For the sake of easier navigation}} {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | |||
− | ====The Shadow Knights (+3)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # If we're going along with NBS's idea to keep it all Castle, Vladek's forces would do well in the customs section; they are red, after all {{C|Mixed in with black, of course}}. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 07:06, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:53, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # Great idea :) Do they have some kind of logo? (just thinking about the little circle if this was to win) {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 20:30, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | #: I'm thinking the scorpion emblem on their torso? They don't have a definite one, but we can just cut out a circle from their chest, I suppose :P {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Per my other opposes. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:11, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Zombie Lords
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not sure how this relates to LEGO at all... {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # ^ {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ===RQM=== |
||
− | ====Alpha Team
(+1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Per my support to Galaxy Squad in CQM name ideas. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:05, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 20:30, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 23:20, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Crusaders
(+1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # I just think it'd be nice to have other Castle factions to kinda go with the existing Crown Knights, like being the same sort of thing, but different. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Per my other crusaders' oppose. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:11, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Drones
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # I don't like the idea of a group of "Drones", to be honest. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Fellowship
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Don't really want to see a licensed theme as a name for a user group {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:53, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Good Wizards
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not too fond of the name. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Galaxy Squad (±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Yeah...and their logo could be Green Squadron's. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Henchmen
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Royal Knights
(±0)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Per Crusaders support {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # I think we should reference different main LEGO themes in each group name, like my above support for Galaxy Squad for customs. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:03, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Turaga
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Per Fellowship oppose {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Dragon Knights
(+2)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | # Per Crusaders support. Would support Royal Knights and Dragon Knights moreso than the Crusaders. {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # I like the idea of sticking with Castle. And the Dragon Knights do have some green in their signature colours, which would signify reviews. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 07:10, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:53, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Different range of themes in the names - QCG for main, which is castle, and hence my oppose ot Crusaders, and most others - different themes, please. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 10:10, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | |||
− | ====Fixer Uppers
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not really LEGO related (it doesn't have to be, I'd just rather it to be, hence the oppose) {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # ^ {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:33, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
− | ====Zombie Lords
(-1)==== |
||
− | ;Support |
||
− | ;Oppose |
||
− | # Not sure how this relates to LEGO at all... {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:58, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | # No. Just doesn't sound right. {{User:Darth henry/Sig}} 22:34, December 26, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | ;Comments |
||
== CQM pages == |
== CQM pages == |
||
Line 272: | Line 68: | ||
:<s>I don't think we're ready to form a member requests page yet. We still need a name and a template. We're also debating the various classes - how many there should be and such. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:16, November 29, 2012 (UTC)</s> |
:<s>I don't think we're ready to form a member requests page yet. We still need a name and a template. We're also debating the various classes - how many there should be and such. {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 22:16, November 29, 2012 (UTC)</s> |
||
− | == Finishing Voting == |
+ | == Finishing Voting for names == |
+ | {{archive |
||
+ | |result=Reviews group named Dragon Knights, Customs group named Shadow Knights |
||
+ | |content= |
||
These names have passed: |
These names have passed: |
||
*Alpha Team |
*Alpha Team |
||
Line 281: | Line 80: | ||
So we need to decide on which combination to use. The proposals were '''both''' medieval or '''both''' other themes. Dragon Knights (green) for reviews, Shadow Knights (red) for customs? |
So we need to decide on which combination to use. The proposals were '''both''' medieval or '''both''' other themes. Dragon Knights (green) for reviews, Shadow Knights (red) for customs? |
||
⚫ | |||
=== Alpha Team and Galaxy Squad === |
=== Alpha Team and Galaxy Squad === |
||
− | + | # {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 18:18, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
|
− | + | # We already have the Crown ''Knights''. :P Let's focus on other themes. {{User:BrickfilmNut/sig}} |
|
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
=== Dragon Knights and Shadow Knights === |
=== Dragon Knights and Shadow Knights === |
||
− | + | # {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 20:18, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
|
− | + | # {{User:Darth henry/Sig}} 20:26, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
|
− | + | # {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 20:29, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
|
+ | # {{user:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP}} |
||
+ | #* Knight, it's not like you do much work in forums - so why can you be voting? Sorry, it is just that I don't think a user who doesn't do much forum work should vote for a major thing. --{{User:CzechMate/czech}} 23:43, December 30, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | #** I only do stuff in the forums if I think it's important, and I think this is important. {{user:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP}} |
||
+ | #** Your reasoning, Czech, baffles me. You're saying he shouldn't be voting in the forums because he doesn't often do so? And would you be saying the same thing if he'd voted in the Galaxy Squad section? {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 00:25, December 31, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | #*** Honestly, yes. I just think that you should vote on something like this when you don't do much forum stuff. {{unsigned|CzechMate}} |
||
+ | #**** So how would you expect someone who doesn't often vote to vote regularly if they aren't supposed to vote? {{User:Jeyo/sig}} 00:57, December 31, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | # {{User:LazerzSoH/signature}} -If I can vote |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:49, 7 January 2013
What makes a Custom "Acceptable"?Having a somewhat filled in infobox, some categories and images of actual customs. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
Power Jim Talk Blogz12:48, 11/4/2012 12:48, November 4, 2012 (UTC) What is the criteria for a "Featured Custom"?
What makes a Review "Acceptable"?
What is the criteria for a "Featured Review"?
Comments
I think we should have three customs and reviews ratings. Acceptable, Good and Featured. I say this because some acceptable customs are at a higher level than others regarding the content. While some just have an infobox, lead section, images and a "promotional background", others have a all of the above and a minifigure gallery and a detailed description. Just an idea.
RatingsUse Unacceptable, Acceptable, Good, Featured
Use Unacceptable, Acceptable, Featured
Comments
CQM pagesI just got around to making the request page and I noticed we need a new template for the "Custom Classes" also we need redlinks made. Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 22:12, November 29, 2012 (UTC)
Finishing Voting for names
|