(→3}}: That's where I meant to have my vote. :P) |
Berrybrick (talk | contribs) (→Vote) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# No description {{RG}} {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:06, October 17, 2012 (UTC) |
# No description {{RG}} {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 04:06, October 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
# {{RG}} {{User:Jeyo/sig}} |
# {{RG}} {{User:Jeyo/sig}} |
||
+ | # {{RG}} {{User:Berrybrick/Sig}} 11:22, October 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
;Downgrade to Class 4 status |
;Downgrade to Class 4 status |
||
Revision as of 11:22, 17 October 2012
10143 Death Star II
This set is currenty listed as "Former FA". It definitely isn't, as it has no description whatsoever.
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
Vote
- Downgrade to Class 1 status
- Downgrade to Class 2 status
- Downgrade to Class 3 status
- No description NightblazeSaber 04:06, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
- --Berrybrick (Talk) 11:22, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Downgrade to Class 4 status
Comments
....It's a former FA. Because, y'know, it used to be an FA. It isn't anymore. Hence "former". Ideally it would have a second, proper rating, but it doesn't have to. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
- True, but I'd rather give it a decisive rating than the title it currently holds, as it makes it look like there's an incomplete cycle there.
Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge
- Added a preliminary C3 rating, because it should really have some sort of current rating. I can make it 3c if you want. And support removal of oldFA status (former FA when it was made wasn't intended to be a downgraded FA, it was former as in it used the former scheme where any old page that looked ok was featured on the main page without any criteria (and in most cases without votes). The current FA voting system (or the start of what it is today) was implemented in 2007 or around then I think) NightblazeSaber 04:06, October 17, 2012 (UTC)