Brickipedia

READ MORE

Brickipedia
Line 9: Line 9:
 
#{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:44, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
#{{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 03:44, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 
# {{RG}} Needs tidying up. {{User:SKP4472/sig2}} 06:26, September 30, 2011 (UTC)
 
# {{RG}} Needs tidying up. {{User:SKP4472/sig2}} 06:26, September 30, 2011 (UTC)
  +
# Definitely. {{User:Cligra/Sig}}
   
 
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==

Revision as of 17:57, 11 January 2012

That's right, I've just started back, and I'm already being mean :P This article (link) was recently granted complete status, but the heading "details" doesn't comply with the MoS, and there's a massive background (and the fourth movie is one sentence with a ... at the end, implying it's unfinished). The description really should be much longer for a minifigure page with 6 variants, and the background should be cut down a bit. NightblazeSaber 03:44, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Keep Class 2 Status

Downgrade to Class 3 Status

  1. NightblazeSaber 03:44, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Crown Knights Needs tidying up.

SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 06:26, September 30, 2011 (UTC)

  1. Definitely. -Cligra Join the redlink war!

Comments

  • Erm, where is it? That link is broken. Also, this wasn't my fault, was it? >:( ajr 03:46, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Don't you mean Captain Jack Sparrow? Jag 03:48, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • Yeah my bad. NightblazeSaber 03:52, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
      • Since voting on this would be a conflict of interest, I won't, but I will say that I really don't see why this shouldn't be a class 2 - save some minor nitpicky details. Also, in future, I'll be more careful to check pages with the guidelines. ajr 03:56, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
        • Hey, if you think it's Class 2 standard, you're more than welcome to vote for it :) NightblazeSaber 09:17, May 2, 2011 (UTC)