Brickipedia

READ MORE

Brickipedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Brickipedia
Brickipedia
40,005
pages

Changes: Brickipedia:Quality Check Group

Back to page
Sign in to edit
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{FA-nav}}__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__
  
{{FA-nav}}__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__
 
{|
  
{|
−
|[[File:Imperial guards.jpg|120px]]
 +
|[[File:Crown_Knight_10.jpg|120px]]
−
|[[File:Completeness checker.jpg|100px|right]]
  
 
| valign="top"|The '''Quality Check Group''', also known as the '''Crown Knights''' is a panel of Brickipedians who review, monitor, and improve all aspects of [[Brickipedia:Content Improvement|article ratings]]. The group consists of all members from the former [[BP:BOR|Board of Reviewers]] and the [[BP:CCG|Completeness Check Group]], and inherit the most of the abilities of both of those groups.
  
| valign="top"|The '''Quality Check Group''', also known as the '''Crown Knights''' is a panel of Brickipedians who review, monitor, and improve all aspects of [[Brickipedia:Content Improvement|article ratings]]. The group consists of all members from the former [[BP:BOR|Board of Reviewers]] and the [[BP:CCG|Completeness Check Group]], and inherit the most of the abilities of both of those groups.
 
* [[Brickipedia:Featured article review|FA review]]
  
* [[Brickipedia:Featured article review|FA review]]
Line 32: Line 31:
 
|}
  
|}
 
== Forums ==
  
== Forums ==
  +
''Voting for these forums are only for members of the check group but other users are free to join existing discussions.''<br/>
 
[{{fullurl:Special:Recentchangeslinked/Category:{{PAGENAME}}}} View recent changes for these forums]
  
[{{fullurl:Special:Recentchangeslinked/Category:{{PAGENAME}}}} View recent changes for these forums]
   
Line 66: Line 66:
 
addlasteditor=false
  
addlasteditor=false
 
</forum>
  
</forum>
  +
<tr><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:left;">{{#forumlink:50|-1>0|← {{int:allpagesprev}}}}</th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000;"></th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:right;">{{#forumlink:50|+1<{{#expr: ceil ({{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{PAGENAME}}|R}}/50) +1 }}|{{int:allpagesnext}} →}}</th></tr></table>
  +
  +
=== Articles with contested or unclear status ===
  +
If you come across an article that was deemed a certain class but disagree with this decision, or you are not sure whether or not an article actually meets the criteria for a certain class, discuss this here. Please look here for articles and contribute, vote, etc.
  +
<table width="100%"><tr><td></td>
  +
<td width="50%">
  +
<createbox>
  +
break=no
  +
prefix=Brickipedia:CC/
  +
preload=Template:CC-header
  +
buttonlabel=Add new topic
  +
</createbox>
  +
</td>
  +
</tr></table>
  +
<table class="forumlist" width="100%">
  +
<tr></tr>
  +
<tr style="background-color:#EEE; color:#000;">
  +
<th class="forum_title" align="left">Topic</th><th class="forum_edited" align="left">Last edit</th><th class="forum_editor" align="left">Last author</th></tr>
  +
<forum>
  +
namespace=Brickipedia
  +
category=Complete_article_review
  +
shownamespace=false
  +
addlasteditor=true
  +
historylink=true
  +
cache=false
  +
prefix=CC/
  +
</forum>
  +
<tr><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:left;">{{#forumlink:50|-1>0|← {{int:allpagesprev}}}}</th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000;"></th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:right;">{{#forumlink:50|+1<{{#expr: ceil ({{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{PAGENAME}}|R}}/50) +1 }}|{{int:allpagesnext}} →}}</th></tr></table>
  +
  +
=== Closed Discussions ===
  +
This is an archive of previous discussions relating to articles with contested or unlear completeness status.
  +
<table width="100%"><tr><td></td>
  +
<td width="50%">
  +
</td>
  +
</tr></table>
  +
<table class="forumlist" width="100%">
  +
<tr></tr>
  +
<tr style="background-color:#EEE; color:#000;">
  +
<th class="forum_title" align="left">Topic</th><th class="forum_edited" align="left">Last edit</th><th class="forum_editor" align="left">Last author</th></tr>
  +
<forum>
  +
namespace=Brickipedia
  +
category=Complete_article_review_archive
  +
shownamespace=false
  +
addlasteditor=true
  +
prefix=CC/
  +
historylink=true
  +
cache=false
  +
</forum>
 
<tr><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:left;">{{#forumlink:50|-1>0|← {{int:allpagesprev}}}}</th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000;"></th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:right;">{{#forumlink:50|+1<{{#expr: ceil ({{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{PAGENAME}}|R}}/50) +1 }}|{{int:allpagesnext}} →}}</th></tr></table>
  
<tr><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:left;">{{#forumlink:50|-1>0|← {{int:allpagesprev}}}}</th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000;"></th><th style="background-color:#F9F9F9; color:#000; text-align:right;">{{#forumlink:50|+1<{{#expr: ceil ({{PAGESINCATEGORY:{{PAGENAME}}|R}}/50) +1 }}|{{int:allpagesnext}} →}}</th></tr></table>

Revision as of 01:51, 4 April 2011

Under construction icon-blue
 This article is still under construction. More content may be added in the near future.


Crown Knight 10 The Quality Check Group, also known as the Crown Knights is a panel of Brickipedians who review, monitor, and improve all aspects of article ratings. The group consists of all members from the former Board of Reviewers and the Completeness Check Group, and inherit the most of the abilities of both of those groups.

The following are duties of the Quality Check Group:

  1. Review all Featured Article nominations and either A) approve or B) reject them in a vote, based on the quality and adherence to FA criteria of the article. All FA noms have to be approved by a quorum of at least 3 panel members, with no objections from another panel member. Members of the Quality Check Group should include {{RG}} (which results in Crown Knights) before their sigs to make vote counting easier. FA candidates can be rejected without a panel vote if removal of the nomination is requested by the original nominator.
  2. Strike unnecessary or irrelevant objections from the FA nomination page. Members of the BoR have the power to strike objections on the Featured Article candidates page provided the objection has been addressed and the original objector has been absent for at least a week after an "objection addressed" comment is left on the FA candidates page, but only with a quorum of at least three panel members approving the removal of the objection, and less than two opposed. Additionally, FA objections can be struck by the Quality Check Group (as well as by any admin) if they do not fall under one of the rules.
  3. Review and possibly remove FA status from an article. BoR members also have the ability to strip an article of FA status, but only with approval of at least three panel members.

Members

(*) Indicates a former BOR member
(†) Indicates a former CCG member

Forums

Voting for these forums are only for members of the check group but other users are free to join existing discussions.
View recent changes for these forums

Past FA review

Please look here for articles and contribute, vote, etc.

<createbox> break=no prefix=Brickipedia:RV/ preload=Template:RV-header buttonlabel=Add new topic </createbox>

TopicLast editLast author
Featured article review archiveNever

Articles with contested or unclear status

If you come across an article that was deemed a certain class but disagree with this decision, or you are not sure whether or not an article actually meets the criteria for a certain class, discuss this here. Please look here for articles and contribute, vote, etc.

<createbox> break=no prefix=Brickipedia:CC/ preload=Template:CC-header buttonlabel=Add new topic </createbox>

TopicLast editLast author

Closed Discussions

This is an archive of previous discussions relating to articles with contested or unlear completeness status.

TopicLast editLast author
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms