Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Rollback and Patroller

This is Brickipedia's requests for adminship page, on which any user may request administrator rights. Administrators have many technical abilities that are used for the maintenance and upkeep of Brickipedia, and a full list of all of the user rights that they have access to can be found at Special:ListGroupRights.

While being an administrator may seem "fun" or "cool", you should consider whether or not you actually have a use for sysop rights before filing a request. Administrators should be active users on Brickipedia with a few thousand contributions who have a good understanding of policies and community discussions here. While being an administrator is not a big deal, it is a significant time commitment, and takes a lot of work. If you are considering nominating yourself for adminship, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

There is an archive here for adminship requests.

===replace this with your username===
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
Replace this with a brief blurb about why you are requesting adminship here. ~~~~
====Support====
#
====Oppose====
#
====Comments====
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. All request will last a minimum of two weeks.

If a user has been nominated for adminship before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

Legoboy9373

Legoboy9373 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - - (Back to user rights requests)

I feel, as does CJC and probably some others, that I am ready for these rights. Living in a time zone in which not many other users do, as of what I know, makes me one of the only editors at the time I am online. I have over twelve thousand edits, over nine thousand of them mainspace. I'm pretty sure I have matured a lot since the beginning of this year and hence I have stopped making useless edits, etc. One year ago, and some time afterwards, I mostly used to make useless edits, for example adding links, etc. Now I try making good ones: improving the vocabulary, fixing grammar mistakes, and more. -Legoboy 10:02, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

Support

1. I think Legoboy's ready for admin. the only black mark on his record is making useless edits to get badges, something which is in the fairly distant past now, and I think that's been addressed pretty well. As he stated in his intro, he's on when most users are not. It's true that he hasn't had much experience user-relations-wise, but seeing as he isn't on chat all that much (that I know of) and mainly sticks to mainspace editing, I'm sure he could benefit the wiki using these rights. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:09, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

1. I never really thought of him as an admin before, but now that he is requesting the rights, I can't see why not. Mostly per Jeyo, but I have seen him on chat pretty frequently and he is as friendly and level-headed as ever. --Berrybrick ^(Talk) 10:18, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
2. ToaMeiko (talk) 10:37, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
3. Edits. Is Friendly. What more could you want? ~ CJC 11:39, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
4. This nom took me by surprise, but sure, why not. The only thing I'd suggest is maybe having a bit more community input in administrative forums (although, there's nothing really running right now :D) NovaFlare 23:27, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
5. Per CJC. BrickfilmNut (talk) 23:28, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
6. Per Berry. -- StealthNinja Contact [[Special:Editcount/LSCStealthNinja|Special:Editcount/LSCStealthNinja Edits]] 23:29, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
7. Level-headed and a good editor. I support. --Jay 23:50, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
8. Fantastic editor. I know he applied on Brickimedia when nobody was looking and the request only go a couple of supports, so I recommended that he postpone it. Really, I have no complaints with this. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:48, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Wow, this was a surprise. I haven't really gotten to know this guy well. I've seen him edit from time to time, but admin? I don't necessarily think he's ready. That may just be because I've never talked to him much. I don't really know which side to lean on, but this was sudden. Looks like you're going to win though - I know you'll become a great admin! --- CM4S (talk) 00:41, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
2. I haven't really seen him all to much, but I'm leaning towards support from the times I have seen him. Vote is subject to change. --Legøfanyøda 00:52, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
3. Seems really sudden, but I am sure you'll make a great admin. --Czech 00:54, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
4. Something inside is telling me this isn't right, but as I cannot provide a valid reason to oppose, I shall be neutral. I mean, this is a huge thing, are you all really sure? Anyway, just my opinion. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 18:23, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

1. I think he needs to be a bit more friendly. Other than that, I'm fine.
   TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
   21:06, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

Admin note: This is MsD, my account got password-scrambled again :c

Comments

• Just asking, but if some of you in the neutral section are sure that he'll be a great admin, why not support? --Berrybrick ^(Talk) 00:54, September 12, 2013 (UTC)