FANDOM

 
34,874 Pages


Lavertus

Lavertus (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,858 edits, 595 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello! As many of you should hopefully know, i'm Lavertus and I have decided to run for chatmod. I have been here for two years and have over 600 edits. I have been back on the wiki for a bit now (and this includes being on chat every night) and I know that I am going to remain this way for a long time. Therefore, I think that I would make a decent chat moderator and I only hope that you can agree too. If anyone has any questions or wants to meet me on chat then please drop me a message. lavertus (talk) 20:52, December 20, 2016 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

VesperalLight

VesperalLight (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,256 edits, 244 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I want to be a Chat Mod because I'm always on chat and I've met a bunch of awesome users. I've been a member of the wikia for almost two years now. I'd love to be able to moderate the chat and help out fellow users. VesperalLight (talk) 23:51, February 21, 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. --MLG NEO-FUTURIST , (Talk) 00:04, February 22, 2016 (UTC)
  2. -- lavertus (talk) 20:24, February 22, 2016 (UTC) Vesp is a very nice user to talk to and I think he is a great fit for chatmod.
  3. Vesp is a great friend of mine. He is on chat very often and I always have a great time when he is. He is very deserving for these rights, as I believe he would make a great chat moderator. --LEGOBennyTheBrick3 (talk) 02:19, February 23, 2016 (UTC)
  4. I don't know him very well but I would support him because I know he is responsible and competent.--Ahawk008
  5. Surtatb2007 (talk) 22:25, February 24, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments


Cam Eron14

I Want to be a chat moderator cause I want to keep excessive language and hostile comments at a low. I think I would be great due to my positive but realistic look on situations and my kind demeanor. I am also frequently on here although not contently and I mostly edit Customs. I hope you will consider me :). User:Cam Eron14 15:32, May 17, 2016

Support

  1. I think he'd be great as a chat moderator. I've seen him on chat several times. --LEGOBennyBrick3 (talk) 20:37, May 17, 2016 (UTC)
  2. I think he should be more active on chat, but he has been an excellent user the times I have seen him. I think he would do a great job as a Chat Mod.--MLG NEO-FUTURIST , (Talk) 22:54, May 17, 2016 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

lavertus

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

hello guys! I have put my name down for chat moderator as i beleive i would fit the role for the following reasons: I have recently become more active on the wiki and in chat. I have about 108 article edits and 511 in general since joining on 26.9.14. I always try my best to sit on the fence during arguements and come to an outcome that pleases both sides. I have ZERO tolerence for fighting in the chat room as i take this wiki and all wikis very seriously. Finally, i won't boast about my abilities i just hope you will agree that i would make a great chat mod. thanks for reading lavertus (talk) 20:30, November 4, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Nice, funny, talented... This is the job for you, Lav. -- LEGOFan999King of Awesomeness
  2. Because I'm a psych major. -WDMB
  3. Your always on chat making people happy and I would love to see you as chat moderator :) User:Cam Eron14

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I haven't seen you once on chat. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 22:55, August 30, 2015 (UTC)
  2. You need to be more active on chat. --Haunted330

Comments

  • This post should have been taken down months ago. Unfortunately, you didn't make it. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 23:12, November 18, 2015 (UTC)


LEGOFan999

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Hello, Brickipedians! I'm LEGOFan999, and I'm now applying for the position of chat moderator! I've been a member for nearing 9 months now and have accumulated 524 edits in that time (132 of those being mainspace edits). I've been hanging around the chat every day in these past few weeks, and I have met some polite and reverent users. If anyone is willing, it would be an exaltation for me to aid in the chat moderator position.

Thank you for your deliberations. LEGOFan999 (talk) 13:17, July 14, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. --Dadaw (talk) 13:30, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  2. What is there to say about LEGO? He is a great friend,enjoys listening to what we saying and always in a good mood.I would see him being a good Chat mod! LEGOCyborg12 (talk) 15:50, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  3. LEGOFan is a great friend and is very kind and welcoming to others on chat. He deserves the title. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 20:15, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  4. LF is a good friend, very easy to communicate to and would make a great chat mod. lavertus (talk) 21:01, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
  5. I enjoy chatting with him. He deserves it --Lego benny the spaceman lego (talk) 16:33, July 15, 2015 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • Congratulations! Rights have been given. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 01:05, July 25, 2015 (UTC)


Dragonknight86

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Howdy! I've returned to this wiki in full swing, and have decided to apply for chat mod! I've been in chat quite alot lately and would love to be able to moderate the wikis chat. Hope you accept my request! Dragonknight86, an admin of Despicable Me Wiki 20:48, January 15, 2015 (UTC)

Support

  1. Dragon is a fantastic user, and will be a wonderful chat mod! Shyguy-emoticon.gifJoey (talk)
  2. Toa Matau Destiny

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I have never seen you on chat, or anywhere else on the Wikia. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 00:42, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

JosephHawk

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Greetings!

I would like to offer my services as a candidate for Chat Moderator at this wonderful Wiki. I've been hanging around the chat for almost every day in the past few weeks, and I have met some awesome users. If this community is willing, I would be honored to help serve in the Chat Moderator position. If you desire to see any credentials, look right here. :)

I hope you graciously consider me a suitable candidate! Shyguy-emoticon.gifJoey (talk)

Support

  1. LEGOFan999King of Awesomeness
  1. Dragonknight86
  1. Toa Matau Destiny

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • While I don't find any thing wrong with you being chat mod, you don't have the required 100 edits.--Toa Matau Destiny
  • Ah ha, sorry 'bout that mate! When I reviewed the checklist, my eyes must have missed that. >.< Shyguy-emoticon.gifJoey (talk)
  • I have now met the requirement. Shyguy-emoticon.gifJoey (talk)

KooLcATCamZ

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I would like to be nominated so I can help make Brickipedia a better place and help out those in need. I would also like to be nominated because I feel I need to do more to help out this wiki! Thank you! ~~~~

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I don't believe I have spoken on chat with you. --Toa Matau Destiny
  1. Never heard of you. --GOLDNINJAMX , (Talk) 00:41, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • Toa Matau I've spoken with you on chat countless times?? What's wrong? KooLcATCamZ (talk) 14:10, December 11, 2014 (UTC)
    • I couple time a while ago, but not recently.--Toa Matau Destiny 11:29, January 13, 2015 (UTC)

DOGLOVER129

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Requested in chat. Toa Matau Destiny

Support

  1. As nominator.--Toa Matau Destiny
  2. --Schtickman (talk) 20:10, October 2, 2014 (UTC) I don't want this wiki to fail because of chat.

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

CheetahBricks

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Snce I meet the criteria (Such as being responsible, kind, did 200+ edits) above, I ask with full respect to become a Chat Moderator. If anyone supports this vote that would be very helpful. CheetahBricks (talk) 21:32, July 24, 2014 (UTC)CheetahBricks

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I have seen you on chat a couple times but I really don't know if your ready for these rights.--Toa Matau Do you have what it takes?Bionicle logo 2 21:38, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
  2. You are never on chat, and neither is anyone else. Until chat gets very active with multiple people, I don't think anyone needs these rights. -DCCN

Comments

  • Not entirely true, DCCN, I have been on chat once or twice, but Matau's right, i might not be ready. --CheetahBricks (talk) 22:34, July 24, 2014 (UTC)CheetahBricks

Run For Your Life BTW I'm The Doctor

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I consider myself to be mature and devoted. I'm often on this chat, but find the chat "unsafe" do to trolls and similar users. I understand that wikia will be appointing users to positions of power soon, but the chat is in shambles. I hope you vote for me as a chat moderator. Thanks for reading this! Run For Your Life BTW I'm The Doctor (talk) 21:34, February 7, 2014 (UTC) Run For Your Life BTW I'm The Doctor

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. This is literally your third edit to Brickipedia. More experience is needed. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:48, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
  1. Who's this? This user needs more edits and experience. Dahahka 08:11, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
  1. I agree with Ajr not enough edits --Legoman27 (talk) 00:16, February 13, 2014 (UTC)Legoman27

Comments

Mr.Brix

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,429 edits, 356 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I really think I should be a chat moderator and I feel that before my requests were weak and I was not mature and ready enough I just wanted a feeling of power but this time I think I could be one I am on chat all the time except for Monday and Tuesday and sometimes weekends and and I feel that my behavior has changed and I am responsible enough for Chat Mod. So what do you say? - -Brix


Support

  1. A fine user. I don't see many problems with him. --LFY1547 21:06, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Dalekst. --Jay 22:40, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ^ ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 14:52, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Should deserve chatmod Unsigned comment by TheDonkeyPuncher (talk • contribs).
    Given your inability to provide reasons why the opposes are invalid while attacking them, I'd like to know your reasons for why this vote is valid. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:17, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

  1. I'll give him a chance. I haven't personally seen any faults with the user. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz07:02, 1/26/2014 07:02, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Haven't seen the user involved in any potential chat issues, and as such cannot adequately determine whether or not you would use the rights effectively. I may change my vote if this changes. BrickfilmNut (talk) 22:51, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Haven't seen much actively lately, but there's no reason why I'd oppose. I'm just not ready to support yet. --Meiko
  • Per BFN. --Czech 06:26, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Czech. -Legoboy 10:07, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  • Can't see a reason to swing either way. ~ CJC 14:22, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Hardly ever on chat and when he is on chat, he only stays for a few minutes. ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 21:45, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
    Rude --PCAddict (talk) 04:47, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
    Striking. Under 100 mainspace edits. --Meiko
  2. While Brix is certainly a lighthearted and well-meaning user, I have concerns regarding his resolve/ability to sort out issues with users and to deal with troublemakers--harshly at times. And, yeah, per TRD. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:20, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

  1. These people in the oppose are not mature and show disrespect towards this person. These comments are rude and disgusting. This doesn't count as "oppose" TheDonkeyPuncher (talk) 10:59, January 16, 2014 (UTC)TheDonkeyPuncher
    Says its not an oppose, so struck. ~ CJC 11:01, January 16, 2014 (UTC)
    Apart from the one that was struck--PCAddicts's "Rude"--the opposes have quite a point. In what way are they disgusting or disrespectful? And trying to make the user look like a fool? Not at all. I'm just giving my observation-based reason for why I don't think he should be a moderator; no bias or slander involved. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 18:52, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

  1. Your foolish looks are wasteful, no it's you and these so called people in the oppused section of wrongness and third, I'm not stupid I'm making you guys revert your choices, your detestable.TheDonkeyPuncher (talk) 18:57, January 16, 2014 (UTC)TheDonkeyPuncher
    You still haven't told me what makes our comments so disgusting. :P And you cannot make us revert these votes because of your opinion; please don't try. (And can you tone done the ferocity of your responses a bit?) --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:03, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Struck TRD's vote per a comment by Meiko that basically said "If you don't see the user that much, it's your own fault." --Jay 22:40, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Unstruck; TRD is on quite often and would see Brix if he was on much; in this case, the reason is pretty valid. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:20, January 8, 2014 (UTC)


Why is this still up Meiko said it was over?

- -Brix

NuffSaid

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

NuffSaid (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,171 edits, 181 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think I should get my moderator status back because I really have gotten to know the rules and studied how to be a successful chatmod. I am more mature than the last time. More organized, and I know my limits. With these rights I will enforce and maintain chat. I know I have conflicts with other users, so if their causing problems I can let another mod deal with it. If there are none I will do what is needed. I really feel more responsible and if you could reply honestly I'd respect that because I want to know how to improve myself and make others around me feel like I'm responsible for the rights. -1385135793000-batman3 [Nexus™] is back! 1385135793000-batman3

Support

  1. I really wouldn't see a problem with this, I'm willing to give him another shot at this. --LFY1547

Neutral

  1. I haven't been on chat lately to know whether he's been or not, so I'll just go neutral. -Legoboy 08:48, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. --LCF (talk!) 23:58, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. There have been innumerable nasty incidents surrounding this user, some of the more recent of which cost him his rights a few months ago. I have seen at least three or four apology blogs wherein he claimed he had changed and was turning over a new leaf, but each time after this another conflict or incident of some sort sprang up. I haven't seen a lot of him lately, it's true, but with his past marred with so many black marks and no huge improvement that I've seen (though I have seen some), it will be a very long time before I am prepared to support a Nuff nomination. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:16, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. A few too many problems for my liking. Ajraddatz (Talk) 07:34, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I really haven't seen much improvement from you since your last big incidents in late September/early October, which had been much on the same track as the events that had your chat moderator rights removed. All I've noticed is decreased activity, more "promises", and less beneficial contribution to the Brickipedia community. You always jump back up from major issues you have saying you've matured or whatever, but in all honesty, every time you've done that, you never improved one bit. Saying something doesn't make it true. From my observation, you haven't improved at all, nor have you given yourself time to improve. I honestly don't think you understand the responsibilities that chat moderator rights carry with them, and I don't think you're capable of holding such a responsibility. Seeing as in your past several apology blogs (all of which had promised that you improved and had matured, yet you continued on the same poor course after each blog) said that you would start editing, and I still have yet to see a consistent amount of effort put into the mainspace of Brickipedia, I don't really have the ability to take your word for anything. Before I can even think about trusting you with such responsibility at Brickipedia, I'd like to see consistent, honest effort put into both the encyclopedia and the community. None of this RPG or sigfig stuff is necessary, and is more of a distraction to yourself and others than it is a benefit. Consistency is a key characteristic of a responsible individual. Seeing as you go from "mature" to having blow-ups, and you make inconsistent contributions to the wiki, I don't think you're close to being responsible enough in my eyes. Give it more time (a year or so). --Meiko
  3. Per above. --Czech 09:17, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Ajr - his was the shortest so the only one I read fully, so perhaps per Jeyo and Meiko, depending on what they wrote. ~ CJC 12:37, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I think you actually have been better since the (superlative) block ended, but it's too soon to gauge if you would be able to handle moderator again. --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:35, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Ehh, per Meiko... --LFY1547
  7. While there have been no incidents that I have seen since your last ban, there have been no "tests" for your behaviour since then either. Until you are put in one of these situations, I'll have to base my opinion on your previous behaviour, in turn requiring me to oppose. BrickfilmNut (talk) 18:53, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Per everyone. The whole sock thing wasn't charming.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 22:14, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

  1. After recent blogs, I think he is intolerant to newer users and is not ready yet. --Knight

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Sibo2808

Sibo2808 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,461 edits, 424 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm on chat almost daily (from 15:00 to 20.30), and when a spammer is on, yeah, you know: Try to say stop, and hoping for a chatmod to arrive. I've wanted to be a chatmod for a long time, but finally decided: "I think the time's now." I am trying to be a friendly user, and I believe I'm so, so it can be more fun to be on chat. I feel that I'm responsible for the rights. ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 14:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

PS: I really want your opinion on your vote! Thanks! ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 18:18, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. --King Kahuka (talk) 14:47, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. --Amir --Mr.Awesome 14:50, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. --Jay 18:31, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. --Klint
  5. The user is online when few other mods often are, and is mature enough to handle the rights. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:39, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Per BFN. --LFY1547 20:46, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Per Dalekst. -

-Brix

  1. He really does deserve the title of chat mod Legoman27

Neutral

  • TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 15:22, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 16:19, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't mean offense by this, but I generally put you into the "spammer/noob" category in my head. I forget who I'm talking to half of the time, so I might be thinking of someone else completely different, but in case I am not, Neutral. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  • I'm not really sure, I kinda have a weak oppose here for some reason, seems friendly, but isn't active very much. I also don't see any helping out in chat issues too. ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Seems quite nice, but I haven't seen enough of him yet. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:07, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I honestly think he isn't ready for it just yet. MsD(talk) 23:36, January 16, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Sibo is a really nice user and he stays on chat for a very long time, he really deserves to become Chatmod, especially how Sibo isn't rude and can handle trouble-making users. --King Kahuka (talk) 19:21, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Sibo is a really great guy and i think he deserves chat mod. --Legoman27 (talk) 04:57, January 16, 2014 (UTC)Legoman27
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was None

Br1ck animat0r

Br1ck animat0r (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (932 edits, 159 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have held the position of chat mod in the past and gained support due to my mainspace edits and chatroom presence. I elected to have my rights removed when I left the wiki for temporary hiatus (for school/exams/personal affairs). While I begin my return to the wiki, I have decided to request chat mod rights to pick up where I left off. From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:34, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Amendment: I'd like to clarify, I did have chat Moderator rights when I left the wiki. The last time my rights were removed was in Autumn 2012 (proof in Logs), I regained moderator rights in spring 2013 until the beginning of my hiatus. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 18:03, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. -Legoboy 12:57, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Can you provide a reason? (Preferably a valid one.) --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 07:32, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I thought we didn't require reasons for supports and neutral votes? --LFY1547 19:09, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
    I'd just like to know. On controversial noms I prefer the supporting votes have reasons, though you're right that it isn't a requirement. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:07, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Why not? --LFY1547 20:17, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I had a nice chat with him today, and looking at his history here, it seems worthwhile. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 00:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Yeah, just don't vandalize anywhere anymore. >_> MsD(talk) 00:17, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Yes! --- CM4S (talk) 00:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yes. I don't remember a time when Br1ck did not deserve it. --Knight
  6. Yes, per Knight. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

Neutral

  1. Haven't seen much of Br1ck lately, leave it some time, and slightly per Jeyo. --Czech 09:28, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. This user behaves well in chat, but the fact that he didn't seem to disclose the real reasons for the removal of his rights is a little upsetting. Perhaps I'll change my vote when I receive more information, but for now, I'm neutral. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:17, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 22:22, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Only because I haven't seen him in a long while, that I don't know if he's any different. Irnakk Council For Lordaeron!For-Lordaeron!

Oppose

  1. I thought there was some spamming/trolling incident that lead to rights removal; certainly I got the impression that they were removed for a different reason than your request. And (though I haven't been on chat much, it's true) I haven't seen much of you lately. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per above --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:59, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Leaves for months after losing moderator rights, and requests for them saying you did nothing wrong. Just asked for removal. Seems legit. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 22:03, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    WP:AGF - since you weren't around back then, you aren't in a position to make such assumptions. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 22:07, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Just listening to what you guys are saying and going by the log. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 01:13, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    And that was a year ago. I think a person can change in a year --LFY1547 01:42, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    But we haven't seen enough to know that he has. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:22, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I've seen him on chat enough lately to know he has; you're not on around that time, though. --LFY1547 23:28, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    I've seen him too. Once, maybe twice. Hardly enough to know if he has changed or if he was just on his best behavior, like he usually was back then. Aside from that, lying in his nomination is not acceptable. --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:07, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I think this request was made too early after returning. I'd certainly consider supporting you in a month or so, but I don't think it'd be appropriate for you to be promoted only days after returning to the wiki. Drewlzoo
  3. Per everyone above. Klagoer (talk)

Comments

  • If you asked for them to be removed voluntarily, then you don't really need to do this, you could just have them back. ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • Although the logs suggest something happened which led to the removal.
      16:41, 2012 August 23 Clone gunner commander jedi (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Br1ck animat0r from chat moderator to Users (Per Admin Wiki, sorry Br1ck)
      . ~ CJC 11:30, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Please note whoever closes this the lack of reasoning on the support side (I'm neutral in this entirely, just noting this) --Czech 09:02, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • You mean "why not?" doesn't exempt you from putting any reasons? :P ~ CJC 11:37, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was None

The Evil Ogel

The Evil Ogel (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (142 edits, 102 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am requesting chat moderator rights because I have become dedicated to the community and feel like it would be beneficial for the community for me to donate my time and efforts in making chat a better place, enforcing the chat policies, and engaging further with the community. I understand that I'm barely over the minimum requirements, but I've watched this wiki for several months, and I only joined when I realised that anonymous contributing had been turned off. I then realised that a live chat was available to registered users, which I immediately joined, and have been active in every day since I joined. Since I had been on this wiki as an anonymous user for several months, I have a good understanding of the members of the community and the policies this wiki has set. I also think that if I were to be a chat moderator, it would add a nice diversity to the team of moderators, as I have been told that I would be the only AFOL on the chat moderator team (this is of course not counting the administrator team, though I have had some great conversations with them). Anyways, I figured I'd put up this request for the reasons I just listed. I hope that the community accepts and approves of this request, as I feel like my time and efforts being volunteered would positively impact the community. Cheers! The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Mature, I see no reason not to. - BF2 Talk 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Super mature, great guy, good contributor, and will use these rights well. --Czech 02:26, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. With a two thumbs up, YES. This user is responsible, mature and I feel like he will contribute so positively with rights. I see this user doing many great things for the wiki and the community. Brick-on The Evil Ogel! -Nuff
  4. I think you're a good user who is always on his best behavior. You are also sophisticated enough to be a mod, so I think you should be. Blob bless you! --Knight
    I'm starting to appreciate this user. Not everyone knows this much and more people should. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 02:59, November 19, 2013 (UTC) (Moved back to oppose)
  5. Ogel is a great responsible and mature new user. BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:12, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:56, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Hell yes. :D --LFY1547 20:14, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  8. I have seen nothing but awesome things from this guy. Definite support. Though I do have one concern... (comments) --- CM4S (talk) 00:31, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Been keeping an eye on this user and can say with certainty that they are a great asset to this community, and would benefit many people by having chat moderator rights. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 20:43, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

#You're a good person, as I've heard, but I haven't seen much of you, which means I don't know what to think of you. --Knight

  1. Just wanted to say that I've seen this and probably won't vote. I think that's all I can say. --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:49, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. He seems nice and all, but he's an evil supervillain, so I'm not ready to give him the rights. Just kidding, but I still think he should have a bit more time to get comfortable with how things are done here. --Jay 02:55, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Never seen the user on chat. -Legoboy 12:56, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I've been in chat every day for the past 10 days. Stop by some time. ;-) --The Evil Ogel (talk) 19:47, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Or, you know, just timezones... ~ CJC 23:49, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Haven't seen enough to tell for sure; definitely leaning towards support, though. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Meiko, stop harassing me. I opposed for a reason, and know that Ogel is you, and would much rather not have 2 accounts harassing me. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 00:05, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    First, where's your proof? Second, stop being overdramatic; your oppose was struck, just deal with it. Oh, and where was he harassing you? --LFY1547 00:06, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    Considering my reply to you above, LFY, I have to say this...I agree with Galad. :/ --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:09, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    (Not so much with the harassment part though.) --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:10, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair enough. --LFY1547 00:15, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

  • Sorry, but you just joined and look how educated you are in the chat. I find it a wee bit odd. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 02:28, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    But is that a problem? If I'm knowledgeable about chat, isn't that a good thing? --The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    But you know so much in so little time. It's a bit suspicious. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 02:33, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Being "suspicious" of a user isn't really a reason to oppose them, and how could it really 'hurt to give him a small little tool that allows you to "kick" and "ban"? --Czech 02:35, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Like I said, I used this wiki before I registered for an account. I had just preferred to contribute anonymously. :-) --The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:36, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    If he is an AFOL which means adult, you'd expect him to read the rules and understand how to follow them, assume good faith and if they aren't fit for the job it's alright. Nuff
    Well, I have three things: Czech, the reason Jeyo opposed is mainly gut. Is it wrong for him to oppose, considering I told him that some of his reasons aren't quite "valid"? Nope. I said they aren't "valid" as I can easily dispute it. I have no problem with the opposition though. Two: Ogel, this has nothing to do with contributing. And even if that were the case, you probably would've made an account sooner. Three: Nuff. Yes, I know what AFoL means. He is a bit too educated in my opinion. Most adults would read through and understand and not get that into it.

It just seems odd to me. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 02:45, November 19, 2013 (UTC) #I really don't see any reason to support. I'm not seeing any difference from him and any other user. Edit: I can't see them using this user actually using these rights either. ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

  • Really? No difference from him and any other new user? You must not be paying a lot of attention to him... --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

  • I'm debating striking this. If you see no reason to support, and you don't list a valid reason why this user shouldn't have these rights, your vote is invalid and should be at most a Neutral vote. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 20:45, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    She sees Ogel as just another user who wants to be chat mod and isn't good enough. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean you should strike it. Unsigned comment by Galadhanu (talk • contribs).
  1. My reasons cannot be posted here at the moment I think. If you beg of me so, I may. ~ CJC 00:14, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^ --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:51, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. This user isn't any different, I also have a suspiscion this user is Meiko since Ogel hasn't been active since Meiko made George Barnick. ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 17:32, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    Ogel has been active today in chat. You've obviously missed him. Additionally, if it were me, what's the problem with that? It's not like you're suspecting it being a duplicate account of a user who doesn't already have such rights and is using an account to illegitimately earn the rights. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 02:00, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
    If it were you, I'd suggest firstly that you didn't vote for yourself... ~ CJC 11:36, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per everyone above. Klagoer (talk)

Comments

  • Ok, I supported, though I have one problem. It's not about Ogel, it's the fact that people think I'M Ogel. I don't know where it all started, but I know Nuff and Knight are involved. I just wanna stop that rumor, I'm not him. So.. yeah. --- CM4S (talk) 00:33, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • That's odd. Tell me about Knight and Nuff and how you know they're "involved". --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

      • I know CM4S isn't Ogel. --Berrybrick (Talk) 03:17, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Brandon1991 (2)

Brandon1991 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (51 edits, 23 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I would love to be chat mod. I'm responsible and mature and I am strict with bullies. so, it would be a great benefit to the wiki fi you made me chat mod Brandon1991 (talk) 03:06, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • Never really heard of the user. -Legoboy 10:21, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Same reason as last time. BrickfilmNut (talk) 03:17, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^. I am also not impressed with his behaviour at LEGO Uncyclopedia. --LFY1547 03:18, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Um, I disagree with the OP. I don't believe he meets the requirements, either. --Berrybrick (Talk) 03:20, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per BFN, LFY, and Berry. LCF (talk!) 03:29, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Oh, that's a link if you couldn't tell. :P --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:33, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • I didn't see the link, but I saw that last night; that strengthens my oppose. --LFY1547 17:35, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • Brandon got globally blocked, does that automatically void this because he couldn't use the rights? --LFY1547 19:11, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Edward Nigma (2)

Edward Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,620 edits, 1,273 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Edward is a mature and active chatter, far more active than he was when his first nomination took place. He's often on in times when most/all mods are away, and he would do well with these rights. He knows the policies well, and he's definitely not the kind of person who is going to abuse these rights. (Old RfCM) --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I thought he already had chat mod. Per LFY's nomination reason. :S --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. He's been great in chat every day that I've been there. He knows the place well, and understands the chat policies like a moderator should. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Ogel Galadhanu (talk) 17:59, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Jeyo --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Sounds good Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:38, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Ajraddatz - BF2 Talk 02:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Ajr. BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:13, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. OK ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  8. -Legoboy 12:54, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Yes MsD(talk) 00:16, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

*I don't recall seeing him on chat lately. -Legoboy 13:43, November 17, 2013 (UTC) (Switched to Support)

  • He's usually on a while after you leave. :P --LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted via PM. --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure I think there's a clear enough consensus. --LFY1547 16:15, November 23, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Dragonknight86

Dragonknight86 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,069 edits, 1,031 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Dragonknight is on chat nearly every day, and he's a mature chatter. I think him having these rights would benefit the community. When he's on chat, he's actually on chat, he's rarely ever away. He's been here for a few months now, and I think he could use these rights. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to neutral)

Neutral

  • Never seen the user on chat. -Legoboy 15:20, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • A fine user, but I have not seen enough of him recently to support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:35, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • I need to think about this one. I've only seen him on chat recently, and he suggested that he was getting high, so, probably leaning towards oppose. --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per BFN. --LFY1547 19:10, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • I haven't really seen this user, and I've been in chat every day since I joined... --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. The last time I saw you on chat, you tend to fought with users. You were also one of the people that celebrated for continuous days after I was banned... does not come off as a likeable person. --- CM4S (talk) 21:37, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. activity is an issue. And hasn't really helped handle situations ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:23, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per CM4Sci;TRD Galadhanu (talk) 15:30, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I can recall a lot of Amir Kinard-ish behavior in the past, and haven't seen enough of him in the present. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Yeah, we don't need a chat mod who is going to be getting high and then going on chat. Also, he has been a bad influence on some users in the past (see Jeyo's opposition). --Berrybrick (Talk) 01:18, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. See above. ~ CJC 01:21, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - BF2 Talk 02:36, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • User accepted via PM on chat. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Galadhanu

Galadhanu (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (549 edits, 215 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am active on chat, and do try to help out chat as much as I can. I am responsible, and am currently on a break from my fanfiction. These rights would be useful, as lots of spammers and trolls come onto chat when there are no mods, and as I am there when nobody else is, it would be useful. Galadhanu (talk) 15:40, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Activity may be a bit of a problem, but other than that, I don't see why not. He hasn't caused problems in a while, I don't see any harm coming from this. --LFY1547 19:07, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per LFY. -

-Brix

  1. Galadhanu hasn't been bad at all lately and has been a good user. Blob bless you all! --Knight
  2. Per LFY Misslilytoon (talk) 00:34, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Haven't seen you on enough to decide. -Legoboy 17:22, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I am on chat for hours on end. You aren't on an entire lot. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 23:15, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Legoboy ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 18:31, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    See above. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 23:15, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Not quite ready to support. You've been doing very well recently, but there are a few things from a long time ago on the LMBW I saw that make me want to wait a while. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:26, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't really see how that would have an affect on how he acts here today. :s --LFY1547 20:38, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    It's because I want to make sure that the incidents in the past truly will never happen again. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:42, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    Ah, I see --LFY1547 20:43, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    #AssumeGoodFaith. :P (Kidding). Galadhanu (talk) 06:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • He has a history of trolling, but he's calmed down quite a bit, so if he gets CM, I won't mind at all. LCF (talk!) 01:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • --LFY1547 23:34, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. To be honest, I really don't trust Galad. He has a history of trolling and spamming on this wiki, LMBW, Community Central and who knows how many more. While many of the issues I just brought up were not very recent, gut feeling still rules this vote: I suspect he's just put on a more social veneer. I also don't want a moderator who orders you to get out if you say you don't know of or don't like Doctor Who. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I haven't spammed on any wiki. :P I think it's right to go with your gut feeling, but don't say anything untrue. Galadhanu (talk) 17:06, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Actually, I don't think Galad ever trolled LMBW that badly, they just thought it was bad. :P --LFY1547 17:08, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I haven't really trolled LMBW. Or Community Central. It wasn't really trolling. I only trolled this wiki when I came here the first time, the second time, I apologized. And look at LFY! He wasn't always the best. He's a moderator now, isn't he? I honestly could just spam now, without moderator rights, but I won't because I don't do that. Galadhanu (talk) 17:23, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    LFY seems to think you were trolling on LMBW (even if it wasn't that bad) and I was there while you were trolling Community Central. And I don't think you only did it once here. Then, yes, you apologized...and later posted a "falling" blog dissing everyone on Bricki and ordering us all to stop spamming blogs and being ridiculous on chat.</irony> --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. LFY was with LMBW when I "trolled" them. Community Central technically wasn't trolling, and I only trolled once here. I was trying to get people back to their senses with the irrelevant blog. With those people saying "ermergerd der werker ers ferllerng", it was in no way irony. Galadhanu (talk)
    He may have been trolling, yeah. However, his trolling was very minor and I'm sure most LMBW users don't even remember it. --LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't order them to get out. I used to jokingly do so, which should've been obvious. I give them a link to every episode if they wish to see it. :P TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 06:00, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
    To quote the great CzechMate, 'Being "suspicious" of a user isn't really a reason to oppose them, and how could it really 'hurt to give him a small little tool that allows you to "kick" and "ban"?' (Of course he's talking about Ogel, but this still applies. :P TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 23:12, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Jeyo. --Czech 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Is this a joke? MsD(talk) 00:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    No, but I am assuming you are only doing this because I opposed your RfCM. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 05:32, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Lol. ~ CJC 09:39, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Is that even allowed? TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 23:12, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


The Rainbow Dasher (5)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,333 edits, 381 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

(These don't really affect anything, do they) Anyway, I'm a responsible, mature user and I usally get insulting PMs towards me and it would be helpful to have these rights. Rainbow Girl Talk 10:41, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. yes siree bob on a corn cob MsD(talk) 21:06, November 3, 2013 (UTC) wait this is a valid support reason right
  2. Dasher is nice to people, active in chat and i think the responsability shouldnt be a problem for someone like she. User:Korppufin 18:38 Finnish time.
  3. BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:32, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  4. After observing chat, sure. --LFY1547 (Back to neutral.)
  5. Yeah, sure. Mature enough, and friendly. --Czech 21:30, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  6. - BF2 Talk 21:30, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  7. A very active user on chat, nice and comes almost every time you say her name! Support!

~ Sibo, Balin, at your service ~

  1. I don't see why not. -Legoboy 17:42, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:49, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. -

-Brix

  1. We need more girl staff :P Every Smurfette needs her Sassette Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
    Irrelevant, I'm afraid. One shouldn't vote someone in because they're a girl; one should judge them just like everyone else. It just so happens that there are more boys on this site than girls, but that's no reason to vote for the girls only for that reason. :P --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:30, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Per Jeyo, but I'll just go neutral. --LFY1547 02:37, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. Still a little wary of this user, given past events and behavior. It's true that I haven't been very active (on chat or the wiki) lately, but I haven't seen enough to convince me she's done much else than put on a more social veneer. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:28, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


King Kahuka

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was SNOW closed

King Kahuka (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,336 edits, 22 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I may have bad anger issues, but i'm actually not that much of a bad person, i'm always against swearing, cursing, and cussing, and i also will read the rules alot more often so i don't forget anymore, i am strict about cursing, so its a good idea if i get these rights. King Kahuka (talk) 21:28, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • I am uuetral with Kahuka's idea. I like him and all , but I just don't know about him. Brandon1991 (talk) 21:32, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Poorly handles instances of conflict and has recently been banned. Self-mentioned anger issues are also a problem. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:33, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Absolutely not. Your attitude on the blogs is just horrid, you get easily mad and then you assume we hate you for not replying to your blogs? You also tend to type in caps a lot, and I really don't think someone with those characteristics can keep calm and have the power. --- CM4S (talk) 21:35, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN and Sci. --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Immature, bad attitude, and really just per Sci, and BFN. --Czech 21:38, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per BFN and Sci. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:46, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per all above, basically. I've had to kick you several times over the past week for caps, and even ban you at one point. If you straighten up and wait a few months, maybe. But definitely not now. EDIT: Oh, and he also doesn't meet the "100 mainspace edits" requirement, either, but I can't remember if we count customs as mainspace. --LFY1547 23:10, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Nope, per above. Starts conflicts, and shouts at people when they tell him to stop. ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:26, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. No basically per Sci, you overreact a lot on chat as well as acting terribly on chat. -

-Brix

  1. No. Has been banned so many times and when a situation comes, he argues. Galadhanu (talk) 05:14, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Definitely not. -Legoboy 11:21, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Oh, I need to point this out: Swearing, cussing, and cursing are the exact same thing... --Czech 21:39, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • i know.
  • by the way i'm just a kid, so don't get all mad at me for all these issues. Unsigned comment by King Kahuka (talk • contribs).
    • Unfortunately, that's irrelevant. What matters is behavior, not behavior in relation to age. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:09, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

  • Although I don't meet the requirements yet to vote, I just wanted to leave this log from when I came into chat here late this evening. It would be my opposition reason, if I could vote.
King Kahuka
does LFY being away mean we can do whatever we want?
10:57
AnthonyGuy
Don't say his name, it summons him  :P
and yes
10:57
King Kahuka
then why aren't we screaming caps and breaking rules willy nilly.

--- a little while later ---

Galadhanu
Kahuka, stop
11:10
King Kahuka
telling me to stop just makes me angry, you have seen what happens with TRD.
11:10
Galadhanu
Not really.  :)
11:10
AnthonyGuy
It goes in the toilet
 :P
11:10
Galadhanu
Are you talking about my phone?
 >:(
 :P
11:10
AnthonyGuy
no, TRD
11:10
Galadhanu
Oh...
That was mean.
11:11
AnthonyGuy
no sense of humor you have
11:11
Galadhanu
But seriously, I said it a bit before you, Kahuka. No need for an argument.  ;)
11:11
King Kahuka
GYAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!
- example of my anger
11:12
AnthonyGuy
Ogel! say something, son!!!
11:12
Galadhanu
LFY. Ping
11:12
AnthonyGuy
 (stop)
11:13
King Kahuka
Anthony  (stop) doing  (stop)
11:13
AnthonyGuy
y
11:13
King Kahuka
and galadhanu  (stop)
11:13
AnthonyGuy
 (stop) ! ! !
11:14
King Kahuka
 (stop) !
11:14
AnthonyGuy
I win
11:14
King Kahuka
 (stop) !!!!
11:14
Galadhanu
Stop spamming emotes please.
11:14
AnthonyGuy
OK mom
11:14
King Kahuka
lets do the lottery
11:14
Galadhanu
I'm not your mother, not trying to be, and am not doing anything against either of you. I am not taking part in this nonsense
11:15
The Evil Ogel
Would you two stop spamming?
11:15
King Kahuka
evil ogel i'm not spamming
11:15
Galadhanu
Per Ogel
Kahuka, you are spamming
11:15
King Kahuka
and "lets do the lottery" is a jok
joke*
11:15
AnthonyGuy
spam?
11:16
King Kahuka
so how is a joke spamming.
11:16
Galadhanu
Considering you're running for mod, it's not good to start spamming or telling people to break rules
The "joke" was not spamming.
11:16
King Kahuka
i'm not
11:16
AnthonyGuy
what is spam???
11:16
King Kahuka
and never am
11:16
The Evil Ogel
You used the same emoticon five times, as well as being hypocritical telling other people to stop using the emoticon that you keep spamming.
11:16
Galadhanu
The stop signs were
Per Ogel
11:16
King Kahuka
anthony was doing it too
and you werent calling on him.
11:16
AnthonyGuy
What is Spam????
11:16
King Kahuka
you were encouriging him.
11:17
Galadhanu
 :|
11:17
The Evil Ogel
I said "both of you stop spamming"
11:17
Galadhanu
^
11:17
AnthonyGuy
I don't know what Spam is ! ! ! ! !
11:17
The Evil Ogel
Pointing fingers saying "he did it too" is stupid, and is pointless.
11:17
Galadhanu
Yep
11:17
King Kahuka
and when you told me to stop i stopped spamming already.
11:17
Galadhanu
Nope.
11:17
The Evil Ogel
But you argued instead.
11:17
King Kahuka
UGH
~ King Kahuka has left the chat. ~
This isn't an action a moderator should make, so this particular user is not ready for such a responsibility. A good user in chat would enforce the rules, whether they are a moderator or not, and whether the only online moderator is AFK or not. This user hasn't shown any knowledge of what a moderator's responsibilities are, so if I could, this would be a definite oppose from me. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 04:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
^This. Galadhanu (talk) 04:14, November 15, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

The Rainbow Dasher (4)

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,333 edits, 381 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Right, I've matured up. Anyway, I'm on chat everyday. I take grammar seriously and I can see when someone is breaking a rule or not. Anyway, voice your opionion. EDIT: No, I'm not planning to go rogue anytime soon, or infact ever. :P --Rainbow Girl Talk 19:41, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Support

#Mature and responsible user. Would do great with CM powers. FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 19:44, September 25, 2013 (UTC) (Switching to neutral.)

  1. Absolutely. A dedicated, respectful, and worthy user. MsD(talk) 20:37, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
    Per the last time I supported (I think I supported last time, at least...). BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:50, September 25, 2013 (UTC) Changed my mind after a couple of events.
  2. Friendly user! almost always on chat! ~~ Majestic - The Magic-Stick ~ White Star Line ~ 15:15, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Hes really active, friendly and always comes when im bored or alone (magic), and i have no reason to be neutral or oppose. user:Korppufin 18:21 Finnish time, 26th of September 2013.. something.
    TRD is a she. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

#The user could use the rights. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

Neutral

  • Not sure if I'm ready to support yet, but I have noticed that you've become more mature and can use the rights. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:38, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Berry. -Legoboy 16:21, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Berry. You've definitely matured, but I don't think you're ready yet. --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 21:38, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Personally, I don't think that long messages like that are spam, just mildly annoying. That said, per Jeyo. - BF2 Talk 12:58, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Jeyo, somewhat, but I haven't seen enough of those things to oppose. However, I also haven't seen enough good out of her lately to support, either. --LFY talk contribs 15:28, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I completely missed this...but no. Strong oppose. This user has recently been known to spam excessive letters while telling off others for spam, claim certain phrases/greeting annoy her and try to get them banned, harass other users, minimod in not the best of ways and just be generally bothersome. I often judge future moderators by how I would feel leaving chat with them on, and in this case I do not feel chat would be in good hands. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:30, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Sorry RTD, but Per Jeyo. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. Per to the J to the E-Y-O. --- CM4S (talk) 21:52, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. You're certainly coming close, but there were a few events today where you didn't quite have a handle on the policy and were annoying some other users. Again, keep up the good work; you're certainly coming closer. You're just not there quite yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:54, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:04, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

      • She did apologize. I don't remember exactly, but I think she said something along the lines of, "I'm sorry, OK? Lot's of users were breaking the rules earlier so I'm just grumpy right now." -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
        • Ah, must of missed that. But even so, that excuse doesn't inspire a whole lot of confidence. :P --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:35, September 28, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Mr.Brix

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,429 edits, 356 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I believe I have matured since my last nominee. I also have been working on my grammar mistakes since the last time (I don't like to spell right when I am on chat :P.) So I thought why not.- -Brix

Support

Neutral

  • Haven't seen you in action in any conflict-resolution yet, so I have nothing to judge based on there, and I haven't seen you enough in chat yet either. BrickfilmNut (talk) 02:50, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 11:32, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • -Legoboy 16:54, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weakish Oppose. This is going to be Per my last oppose on your last application, and I only see you on chat for about an hour or two. I don't really see you helping mods either. "Not ready- though I respect your feelings that you want to be a chat mod, you seem like a fit person for the job but that's not the reason I'm opposing. Being a chat mod is about being there anytime you can. We barely see you on chat unless you want to bring something towards our attention. So I believe that if you are on chat more over the course of the next few days and promise to dedicate some time everyday to patrol chat. I might change my opinion. Thinking with Bricks! 16:27, August 10, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid" So, Per this really ^ 1385135793000-batman3 [Nexus™] is back! 1385135793000-batman3
    Per Nuff. However this isn't a weak oppose. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 18:51, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You really haven't changed at all. You still are immature at a lot of times are are not capable of handling this at all. --- CM4S (talk) 19:26, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. "So I thought why not." This makes me feel like you just want to be a chat moderator to be a chat moderator. Per others too. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  4. I don't think you're fit for this position, at least not yet. You're not really mature on the wiki and chat. You once attempted to provoke MsD by saying you're "more mature than him", which ironically, is quite immature. You haven't really acted mature any other times I've seen you, either. FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 20:15, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Per all above. --Czech 01:10, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Nuff. Weak Oppose. Sorry. --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 21:35, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • You haven't formatted this request properly, and you should take grammar seriously as a mod. Since I cannot vote, this is just my thoughts on this. -->SkyDrift< 10:49, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Link to last request (or, when was it?) ~ CJC 16:40, September 20, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

LFY1547

LFY1547 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,185 edits, 909 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello, all. I've decided to (or at least attempt to) request CM rights today.

Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made one hundred contributions to articles here?

Yes. (actually longer than just that), and yes.

Do you regularly participate responsibly on chat?

Yes, I'm on whenever I can be on, which is usually most of the second half of the day, and I try to be as friendly and mature as I can.

Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?

Yes. When a user uses a blocked word or violates another policy, I kindly remind them of that policy.

Thank you for your vote, whether it is an opposing vote, or a supporting one. :)

FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 01:04, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Absolute yes. LFY is a great user, completely mature, and he totally can handle these rights! Gooo LFY! --- CM4S (talk) 01:08, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. An actually sane user, who can be trusted with rights, and is also a good person. --Czech 01:09, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per above 1385135793000-batman3 [Nexus™] is back! 1385135793000-batman3
  4. Great, responsible user. Some of the past incidents with the LMBW had me worried at first, but upon looking into them again, I don't think they'll have too much of an impact on his actions here. BrickfilmNut (talk) 22:07, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yes. -

-Brix

  1. Yes, Legofanyoda is a mature user and is on chat very often. Deserves Chat Moderator. --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 21:37, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. - BF2 Talk 14:52, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Posting a vote for Meiko that he told me to post. He's still a member of the community, and even though Wikia globally blocked him, he still has a say in community votes like these. His reason: "Support, LFY is a positive user, and knows the rules well. I haven't seen him cause problems in a while, so I don't see what could go wrong with him having these rights." --Silence, Doctor (talk) (Posting for ToaMeiko) 19:56, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • ~ CJC 11:31, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • -Legoboy 11:37, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree with BFN for the most part, but something's keeping me from supporting. I don't know what it is...but it doesn't matter; this looks as if it will pass. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:57, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Per my skype conversation with Meiko, although I may change this vote. He's a little too...nosy. He gets up in everyone's business and makes comments. And it's annoying. MsD(talk) 23:26, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
    Hate to say it, but that sounds very hypocritical. --Czech 23:36, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
    No it isn't. MsD(talk) 23:40, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

#He joined only ten days ago, so I reckon he should wait some more. -Legoboy 11:36, September 24, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to neutral)

  1. He seemed to be a good user at first, very active and such. But now I see him sort of... decaying... --Rainbow Girl Talk 15:39, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'll probably support in a short bit; there are just a few things I have to research first. BrickfilmNut (talk) 02:50, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was closed by request from nominee

The Rainbow Dasher (3)

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,333 edits, 381 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Right, I haven't done anything bad for quite a long time now also add all the other stuff since my last request. Do your stuff down there. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 19:52, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. --Dragonknight86 (talk) 19:53, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Have seen a fair amount of improvement in this user's behaviour, and actively seeks to resolve in-chat issues. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:53, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    19:59, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  1. A nomination for this just closed a week ago, so this shouldn't even be open. (I'm not sure how long you are supposed to wait.) I've only seen you on chat once since it closed, and I've seen nothing to change my mind since. --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:57, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    I believe it's two weeks that you have to wait.
    TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    20:00, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    So do I, but I can't find it recorded anywhere. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:01, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Berry. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. TRD rarely says anything in chat, usually just uses an emote, no reason to have Chat Mod. - BF2 Talk 20:47, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
    BF2, you should really check the logs before you oppose, the reason I don't say much is because usally when you're around the main topic is "LEGO Galaxy" so I don't want to interupt. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 17:55, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry. -Legoboy 18:16, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

MsD (3)

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,629 edits, 986 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm active on chat, and I'm trusted with rollback and patroller rights here, and sysop over at Wikianswers LEGO, so what can go wrong? I've been here for almost two years, and have never been banned or blocked. MsDtalk 23:34, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Per my support last time. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:40, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. MsD is quite well behaved on chat. Although he may be a little immature every once in a while, I don't think that's enough to keep me from supporting. --Legøfanyøda 01:11, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Your activity seems too inconsistent. You can go one month inactive, come back for a week, go inactive again, and then come back. I'm not sure. Additionally, some of your actions are occasionally out of line. I won't oppose yet, but I'm not sure I have enough reason to support. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:39, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko on activity. ~ CJC 09:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko for activity as well. -

-Brix

  1. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  2. Per Meiko. --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 00:11, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  3. -Legoboy 09:35, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. Per Meiko. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:43, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. #Hardly see him on chat. -

-Brix

  1. You're kidding, right. I request to strike this vote, as he voted on both mine and Trace's noms with this reason, and Trace's was neutral and mine oppose. That makes no sense. MsDtalk 12:28, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Struck. I don't see it as a valid oppose reason. If you want Mr Brix, put it as neutral. ~ CJC 16:53, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Very weak oppose. MsD is a friend, but I wouldn't trust him as a moderator. This is all based on past experiences. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:39, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I've known MsD for 2 years now. He is periodically very mature, but I've also had to face a different side of him on several occasions. I don't mean to put MsD down, he can be a great user, but I have had to block him for extended periods of time on the LMBW for trolling, duping, and impersonating. Aside from the trolling, most of it was awhile ago, and I like to think he has matured out of it, but I'm not fully confident. He is actually currently blocked on the LMBW right now for trolling. I don't see anything wrong with rollback/patroller rights, but I'd be very concerned about something like CM that is easier to abuse. Again, I mean no offense MsD..Drewlzoo
    Why would I ever abuse my rights. MsD(talk) 01:10, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per all above. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

Comments

  • What account is this meant to be applied to if it passes? ~ CJC 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    It won't. It's 2-3, would need 10 more supports to pass. But if it did it would be to the MsD account.
    TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    20:38, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Since he's leaving, should we close this? --Jay 18:05, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
    • Same reason the last request closed if so :P ~ CJC 18:02, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
      • Actually, it should have closed a few days ago anyway. ~ CJC 18:03, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Awesomeknight1234

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (6,176 edits, 556 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Knight is a good, active chatter, and doesn't violate policy at all. He's one of the more-trustworthy users I can think of, so I feel he could be trusted with chat moderator rights. He's also very sociable and welcoming to new users, which is good to have in a moderator. ToaMeiko (talk) 23:52, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

As nominator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:52, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
Tentative support. Will see how it goes. --Czech 23:57, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  1. YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS --- CM4S (talk) 23:57, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
    Seems legit. --Czech 23:58, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Of course. MsDtalk 00:19, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Not the most friendly user I've ever met, but I think he knows how to handle power. --Jay 00:28, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    What do you mean not friendly? Most of those times it's obviously a joke. :P --Knight
    Maybe it's my gut talking to me --Jay 00:34, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
     :P Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
  4. OK. ~ CJC 09:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I see him on chat very often and has potential for CM.-

-Brix

  1. Yes. -Legoboy 19:03, September 2, 2013 (TC)
  2. Haven't had any issues with him. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:39, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per others. -NBP 20:08, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I'd be willing to try it again. During his initial run as moderator, he did very well. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:41, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Bug. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  6. Yes. Knight is very well-behaved and mature on chat, I think he'd do good as a Moderator. --Legøfanyøda 01:08, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Per everyone. :P --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 00:14, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I realize now Knight wasn't the one at the most fault, but merely feeding into the situation at the wrong time. Others involved are still being debated what will be done. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:42, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'm not fully aware of what's been going on involving Knight, but I have never been completely comfortable with him having CM rights. Drewlzoo

Oppose

  1. Today he was harassing ToaMeiko on chat, so do not trust for for these rights. --Czech 22:54, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Chatlog? Unsigned comment by ErkelonJay (talk • contribs).
    MediaWiki:Chat/Logs/04 September 2013, just do Ctrl+F for "#hashtag", as that's about when it starts. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:00, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Per above. Unacceptable, and put me in a defenseless position, as it was several users partaking in harassment, even as a moderator, as the other online moderator was feeding in to the negativity. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:00, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Switching to neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:42, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    That wasn't harassment, it was you acting up under stress. >_> MsDtalk 23:05, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    And it was you continuing to argue about it, and using disrespectful sarcasm even though I asked you to stop twice. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:09, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Can you please point to me where I used sarcasm? MsDtalk 23:09, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    I actually did not use any hashtags as much as other users, only once I recall. And I think you were acting up about it. If it had spaces and no hashtags, you wouldn't have freaking out, so I don't see any problem. I guess it could be considered some disrespect, but not too much. --Knight
    It bothers me how you're accusing people who tried to stand up for Nuff and I of wrongdoing. Blame me fully, if you wish, because I was in the wrong. They were only trying to remedy an uneasy situation, which had both of us acting negatively. Honestly, it was ridiculous on both of our parts, Meiko. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 01:26, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Concerns regarding inappropriate remarks (one of which got him kicked just recently), ability to cope with pressure and prejudice. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:49, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Is it not true Meiko has linked videos with inappropriate words in them? Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
    What does this have to do with me? --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:18, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Nothing, but I would like to say that if a chat mod can't hint at stuff, an admin can not link multiple times videos with inappropriate titles. --Knight

Comments

  • I accept this nomination. I think it's about time, but I think I'll fail. --Knight
  • Anyone have a snippet of the chat they are referring to? I looked through the logs, but I didn't see anything from Knight that I'd consider harassment. --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:06, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • See what Meiko said to me. --Jay 23:07, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Okay, but when should I stop? I'm not seeing anything but a pointless argument. --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:11, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • When one of the belligerents leaves the chat. That happens a few minutes in. --Jay 23:12, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Meiko? If that's it, then I don't see what Knight did wrong. I feel that if they are going to oppose him for it, then Bug's position as mod should be under question. --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:15, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per above, the two opposes are pointless. MsDtalk 23:15, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • So apparently Meiko got mad because they used some hashtags or something? --- CM4S (talk) 23:17, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • I think so. Then again, chat usually doesn't have a point anyway. --Jay 23:21, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • I can have my own opinion. I didn't ask for you to agree with it. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:25, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • That's like me getting mad because you post so many song links. Doesn't seem like much of a reason to oppose. --- CM4S (talk) 23:27, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • ^^ MsDtalk 23:28, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • To clarify the chat logs, I have not, nor do I plan on, committing murder. Any allegations to the contrary are slander. ~ CJC 23:36, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, I don't have the time to say anything "fancy" or professional, so I'll just say my opinion right now and try to elaborate it some other time. The whole hashtag thing was kind of irrelevant, and Meiko was totally in the right to point out the that it was unnecessary. Because, well, it was. It added no value, and didn't have to be extended to the point where it started annoying people (isn't the whole point of chat rules to keep everyone happy?). Of course, saying that, Meiko, did this one little issue really need to be extended to an oppose? I mean, it wasn't huge. This is the kind of thing that, like everyone else has been saying, is better suited for talk pages or private messages. BrickfilmNut (talk) 01:24, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • My oppostion was in regard to the reaction I received, and the reaction I received for asking the conversation be dropped. After reviewing the logs again, it's not Knight I'm concerned about anymore, so I've switched to neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:28, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • I resign this request. After seeing many user's reactions I've seen I've been an idiot. --Knight
  • No, you haven't. --- CM4S (talk) 01:31, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree with CM4S, you haven't been an idiot, only the people around you. You shouldn't have this taken down. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:44, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • You don't have any reason to. Keep it up. You're going to get them anyway. --- CM4S (talk) 03:03, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Agent Trace

Agent Trace (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,075 edits, 553 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm on chat a bit, and I'l like to have a go at moderation. Agent Trace Talk 1,075 Edits! 01:17, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Alright. Although he's a liiiiiiiiiitle sketchy activity-wise, he's one of the more mature Brickipedia users and I see some benefits coming from this. MsDtalk 01:22, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. When this user is in chat, they are always appropriate. If they can manage to enforce the rules, I can't see what could go wrong. A bit per Jeyo, but I'd be willing to let this user have a shot with chat moderator rights. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:35, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 02:04, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Sure, they've been away for a while, but both before then and since they have been an exemplar member of the community. ~ CJC 20:24, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per MsD and the first bit of my neutral vote. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:55, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Trace does seem like a level-headed, trustworthy user, but I haven't seen him/her enough to vote either way. --

<s>Jeyo</s> Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:19, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^ --Berrybrick (Talk) 01:20, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^^ --Czech 02:08, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Never seen the user on chat. -Legoboy 12:59, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Jeyo. If I see him in chat more often, I'll probably switch to "Support". BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:56, August 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Never seen Trace on chat... -

-Brix

Oppose

Comments

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:55, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

    • Oh so all the agents are related! :o I'd been wondering about that for a while haha. --ToaMeiko (talk) 02:00, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • What about Agent Swipe? --Jay 20:27, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
        • Probably just because Agents was out at the time, and both Swipe and Fuse/Charge/Trace had the same idea :P. ~ CJC 20:30, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
          • Swipe isn't their sibling, no. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:00, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  • Does anyone have a problem with me closing this early? Four more days can be a boring wait and Trace's success is imminent. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:55, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

    • I don't ~ CJC 10:46, September 3, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Mr.Brix

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,429 edits, 356 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think I should be a Chat Mod because I am on chat a lot and many users have said that I am responsible and fit for the job. So I thought I should request it.

Support


Neutral

  1. Haven't seen you enough on chat to come up with a decision one way or the other. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:22, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per BFN. -Legoboy 15:58, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  4. Brix is a shining example of an active, appropriate user in the Brickipedia community. I've never seen him act out, disrespect another individual, or cause moderators or admins any trouble. However, I have not seen him in chat as much as I think he should be to have chat moderator rights. I have been away for a week though, so I'm not sure how things have been during that time. I would like to see one thing from Brix though, that being enforcing the policy. He does a great job following it, and if he has the ability to correctly enforce it, he'd be a great moderator. Leaning towards support. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:54, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I wouldn't say that's necessarily a reason. I don't think you're ready yet. --- Sci (talk) 16:15, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Not ready- though I respect your feelings that you want to be a chat mod, you seem like a fit person for the job but that's not the reason I'm opposing. Being a chat mod is about being there anytime you can. We barely see you on chat unless you want to bring something towards our attention. So I believe that if you are on chat more over the course of the next few days and promise to dedicate some time everyday to patrol chat. I might change my opinion. Thinking with Bricks! 16:27, August 10, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  3. Sorry, I just don't think you're ready. You should be on Chat a little more, and per Nuff, you should be on Chat to patrol as a Moderator, not just to show us something. Maybe in a couple months I'll change my opinion. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits 16:31, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. As per others, I know you'll be ready soon enough, just not yet. Per Nuff really. -NBP 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  5. (sorry about my inactivity, I'm trying to quit Wikia.) I dont know exactly what blunt means, but I think this may be: You overreact to everything, aren't welcoming, don't already make the chat a better place, don't really seem to care about the chat, etc. MsDtalk 01:54, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Mostly per MsD (except that's not how I use blunt) and you don't exactly overreact to everything. --Berrybrick (Talk) 01:23, August 22, 2013 (UTC
  7. I haven't been on chat a lot in the past few weeks but when I was on, you weren't on a lot Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

RaceLord

RaceLord (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (15,680 edits, 8,264 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been thinking about this for awhile, and think CM4S gave me the pushy type thingy on chat. CM4Sci: "race apply for chat mod" "i don't get why you don't have them".

But guess most people will be Oppose or Neutral saying "not mature enough", "explodes to much", "might be crazy", "doesn't like pie", or "I hate him".

I really think all/most of those arn't real reasons for someone not to be chat mod, some are just random ones I thought of. Who cares if the chat mod is a little random? They just need to be not be crazy with the kicks and bans and not be spamming stuff all the time.

Guessing this will be a question: "you even giving a reason for you to be chat mod, man?" Maybe i'm not, maybe I am, maybe i'm Deadpool.

But guessing CM4S told me that because someone was being a noob (possible puppet) and Berry, Storm, and BFN were all AFK. And maybe because i'm on a lot. Idk if he was joking or not.

Idk why i'm still adding stuff on, choose which to go with! Support, Neutral, or Oppose. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Support

  1. Definite support. There have been too many incidents where mods are on and are not doing their job. I trust this user. --- CM4S (talk) 20:05, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Being a chat mod myself, and knowing that Racelord has been on this wiki for quite some time (I don't actually know that.... okay just looked it up, and yeah he's been here for a while) I believe Racelord should be a chat mod. With 13,021 edits, Rank 15 on the wiki and an occupation of "stuff" there is no doubt Racelord will make a good chat mod. Creeper S (talk) 20:13, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. *scrolls on Brickipedia for something interesting* *remembers this page* *scrolls to bottom* "HELL YES!" MsDtalk 00:33, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Per Berry, in some way, except I don't feel quite as strongly as him. While you certainly could use the rights in some instances, are in chat quite frequently, and are a user that I respect a fair amount, whenever you do chat, it is something, just, well, random. And that's not bad; it can be a little entertaining, but it's not always the most constructive either. Also, there have been a few Brickimedia-related conflicts that still stick in my mind and have me mildly worried. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:24, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Though I can think of worse options, RaceLord does not put very much attention on chat. He'll often go away, come back hours later, and ask what is going on in the middle of an (often pretty clear) conversation. Aside from that, it is rather annoying how he pretends to kill, explode, and a plethora of other violent actions which are borderline spam. Also, I think that a mod should be able to maintain a certain quality of grammar, and RaceLord can be hard to understand and doesn't even capitalize his is. (I would not oppose if that was my only reason, but I do want to bring this up.) Also, his "logic" is often just saying that someone is wrong, no matter how sensible they are being. For an example of that, look here. (Not exactly his logic, but it's the same line of thinking in some of the things he said to Meiko.) And yes, not being mature enough is a huge reason not to be a chat moderator. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:17, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    ok...... being random is what I am, telling me not to be random is like telling The Runaway Guys on youtube to be normal ("tried" once, worst video ever). I don't bother to have "I" in cap because I type fast and don't bother. Grammer, you mean when I say "jsut" and "soemone"? Thats from typing fast. "He'll often go away, come back hours later", I am usually playing Minecraft, World of Warcraft, or watching stuff on youtube. "ask what is going on in the middle of an (often pretty clear) conversation", um.... most of the timeI come back and something random is going on that I don't understand without going back and reading past words. "pretends to kill, explode, and a plethora of other violent actions" I watch shows like NCIS, Castle, and Hawaii Five-0 and play/watch-videos-of games with guns, swords, and other crazy stuff. "not being mature enough is a huge reason not to be a chat moderator", Meiko explodes sometimes, and what is your version of being mature? Think I answered everything, or almost everything. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
    Where did I tell you not to be random? And no, I don't mean "jsut" and the likes. I mostly meant not capitalizing, but like I said, it's not a big deal. You're just explaining why you don't focus on chat, which doesn't make a difference. Yes, sometimes something random is going on, but it happens in normal conversation too. Watching/playing violent shows/games doesn't make a difference. My "version" of being mature includes not being so random. Again, I'm not asking you to change, but it's a bit excessive and not something I like to see so much out of a mod. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:44, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    You didn't, i'm saying telling me not to be random is like that. I only capitalizing when its important, like if I was editing a page or something. Don't think capitalizing on chat is to important, but you did say "it's not a big deal." I don't need to focus on chat, chat isn't my life. Don't think I have anything to say about the random stuff on chat part. "Watching/playing violent shows/games doesn't make a difference" what does that mean? "being mature includes not being so random", don't think I have anything to say about that. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
    Yes, which is why that isn't relevant. I do think that using good grammar is important (when you aren't in a hurry) and is part of being mature. Again, I wouldn't oppose solely based on that. Chat doesn't need to have your sole focus when you are a mod, but I don't think that you give it enough focus as it is. Like I said, you often leave for hours at a time (which is fine, like you said, you have better things to do) but you return in the middle of a conversation without understanding what is happening and don't make too much of an effort to find out what was happening. What I meant by saying that it doesn't make a difference is that I feel my points still stand despite that. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:59, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    Don't get why all of you go to the bads and not the goods Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
    RaceLord, yes, there are good things about you but they don't outweigh the reasons why I don't think you should be a mod. It doesn't make you a bad person, I just don't think it's a good fit. I couldn't handle being a doctor or security guard, but that doesn't make me a bad person. --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:23, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    You just confused me. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  2. While I can only read a few replies to this since I'm on a phone with limited time to spare, I can say that RaceLord is a great member of the community, but does not engage in chat enough compared to the amount of time he spends AFK. He also "spams", although it's not in bad faith, but he does make some pointless messages that get old after a while. He often makes some inappropriate remarks regarding other members. I'd go in more detail but need to leave. I may expand on this later. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:04, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:19, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Meiko ~ CJC 20:32, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry, and Meiko. --Czech 00:35, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


MsD (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccesful; doesn't like chatting here anymore...

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,629 edits, 986 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I was told by a few users that I should renominate myself. So, that's what I'm gonna do. :P This is my second request, my first one is located in the archive.

I'm MsD, a user and editor of Brickipedia since October of 2011. First things first, the checklist.

  • Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made one hundred contributions to articles here?

Yep, and I have more than 760 mainspace edits, with quality enough to earn me patroller and rollback rights, and administrator at Wikianswers LEGO. This helps show my dedication towards the LEGO wikis and my means to make this chat a better place as well.

  • Do you regularly participate responsibly on chat?

Yep. I'm on most every day, help new users, and I don't spam. And even when I am angry (which doesn't happen a lot), I have lots of self-control.

  • Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?

Yes. I don't spam, I don't pick fights with people, I like to talk, and I don't really have any "enemies". :3

Now for some extra stuff. Despite some of the opposes I got, I'm not a spammer. In fact, I revert spam almost every day. I don't troll, either. :P Now, during the incident with Clone and CM4S I was pretty angry, but me and CM4S get along now and Clone doesn't really talk to me anymore. So, I don't hold grudges, which is a good thing for a ChatMod. I am always willing to help anyone who needs it, as I am knowledgeable with things relating to LEGO and Wikis. Also, those of you that neutral'd and opposed me because I'm a LMBW-er, I'm not, and I requested a permablock there. I'd love to voulenteer as a CM here, and I think I'd do well with these rights, as do Meiko, Jeyo, LFY, and Nuff. :D MsDtalk 19:18, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Great user, on chat a lot, has matured. I think he is ready for this job. Though with a rough past with conflicts I mean, you gave me rights! FULL SUPPORT. Thinking with Bricks! 19:21, August 3, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  2. User has, over the last little while, proven himself trustworthy and dedicated to the community. Support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:28, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:14, August 3, 2013 (UTC) #Uh, sure I guess. Won't hurt. --- Sci (talk) 22:28, August 5, 2013 (UTC) (I still support you)

  1. Mature user, on Chat a lot. --Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Neutral

  1. Per BFN, but also Meiko. --Berrybrick (Talk) 15:58, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Just not yet. You've been doing great, but the occasional problems are not good ones. For example, you left in a fit after your first RfCM was not going the direction you intended, blamed it on two user's, and left dramatically. I'd rather not see a user holding rights be doing that when they are faced with a problem or conflict. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:31, August 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko. -Legoboy 09:23, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  4. Any problems or fits with the community will not gain my support, I'm going to have to say no. -NBP 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

#Per Meiko --Village.gw105 (talk) 20:55, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

Struck, less than 100 mainspace edits to articles on Brickipedia. MsDtalk 00:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Only admins can struck, as far as I am aware... --Czech 00:44, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Does it matter? --Jay 00:49, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • We get along? --- Sci (talk) 19:23, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • It probably means you don't fight. Do you?--Jay 19:25, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
      • We get along. We don't fight, I supported his emotes thing, and I think he's a fine Brickipedian. MsDtalk 19:26, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • A little late to the party, but below it says you are trying to quit Wikia? ~ CJC 09:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)


Edward Nigma

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was no verdict

Edward Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,620 edits, 1,273 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Never have I ever seen someone more mature and friendly on chat (except maybe Meiko when he first joined :P ). He's been here more than a year, he's on chat a lot, clearly knows the rules, makes good, needed edits, and is just simply dedicated, mature, and worthy of a few extra buttons to make this chat a better place. MsDtalk 17:26, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. MsDtalk 17:26, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. He's been making great edits recently, but I haven't seen him on chat but a few times. I think he should start with patroller/rollback rights here, honestly, but I'm certainly not going to oppose if he feels he's ready for chat moderator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:57, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko. --Berrybrick (Talk) 18:58, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Not really seen this user in chat before. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    Not even as MassiveSodaDuck? --- Sci (talk) 19:24, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ~ CJC 21:17, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Still not sure. --- Sci (talk) 19:24, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Meiko BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:28, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ^--

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:58, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^--Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  2. -Legoboy 09:20, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I can't oppose it, but not on chat enough for me to support. Per Meiko as well. -NBP 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Never seen this person on chat Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  2. Per RL, I really haven't either. --- Sci (talk) 12:22, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
    Isn't not seeing a nominee in chat only grounds for a "Neutral", not an "Oppose"? BrickfilmNut (talk) 13:26, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
    There's no rule about it, but most people ere on good faith and just go neutral. Not sure if its considered a valid oppose reason or not. ~ CJC 21:49, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Don't RfRs have to be self-nominations? --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:57, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Only for Admins. --Jay 19:26, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Not necessarily; LazerzSoH nominated me for Admin. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:44, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

  • I read that somewhere. --Jay 19:49, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Tbh, the rules regarding RfR's could probably do with centralising and sorting, as people keep citing rules I thought we'd never had/dropped a year ago, etc. ~ CJC 21:18, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree, another rule being the 80% support, since I've seen people recently get them for just having over 50% I think. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:25, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I thought we stopped using that in maybe 2011 or early 2012, when there was a big push on consensus, I didn't realise it still said it at the top of the page. I think 80% is a rather arbitrary target to be fair. If I have to close stuff, and it is not clear cut, I'd just take into accounts reasons for opposes and supports and judge it on that. (or, UCS.) Anyway, this is something that belongs on a forum and not here, so I guess we should stop discussing it here :P ~ CJC 21:32, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I was ignoring this discussion before, until I read that the 80% rule wasn't still in place. When I only had like 1 opposer and 6 supporters before CGCJ came in, I asked Ajr about that rule, because if that wasn't in place that meant it was successful. He said it was still in place, and that when I got 80% I could contact him and I'd get the rights. (note that I'm not asking for anything, I'm just pointing it out) MsDtalk 21:42, August 1, 2013 (UTC)


MsD

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not succesful

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,629 edits, 986 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm selfnomming myself to become a new chat moderator. I think I'd do good in this position because;

  • I'm trustable. I mean, I make good edits, I do good with Patroller, and I wrote that one good review, and I do it every day. So, what can go wrong with an extra responsibility on my hands?
  • I'm familiar with the rights. When the Yoshi Wiki was really active, I gained sysop and moderated chat, so I got familiar with the chat mod stuff.
  • I'm respected, and respectable. I cannot name one person who regularly goes to this wiki that openly dislikes me. And also, I cannot name one person that I really do not like (other than spammers, they bug me to pieces ._.).
  • I'm a good community member. I'm used to the community, as I've been coming to this chat since December of 2011. I fit in well with the rest of the community, too. I've also never been blocked or banned from chat. I am also a large anti vandal, as I revert spam and vandalism within usually the first couple minutes of it being done.
  • I'm active. Just ask Meiko or CM4S, I've been on chat nearly every day since Brickimedia's closure.

Oh yeah, and here's a quote by Mr. Meiko: "If he improved some of his actions, he'd actually be fine. He's a knowledgeable user, understands how wikis work, and is able to identify the strong and weak points a wiki and its community has." MsDtalk (July 15, 2013)

Support

  1. I don't really see where he needs to improve - he's been very mature and behaved on chat since I've seen him here. He has my full support. {{SUBST:User:Winklemeyer/Winksig}} (Legofanyoda)
  2. €ħɨþ-Ŧɦé-ΣǭuƖɲØж 20:20, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
    Changing to support. You are quite respectful, know the rules, are in chat frequently and usually do a good job with self-control. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:12, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Still Per Meiko - and due to inconsistency of my vote between different requests of similar cases. ~ CJC 22:17, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Is in chat a lot. Clonetrooperfan2207 (talk) 03:16, July 16, 2013 (UTC)Clonetrooperfan2207
  5. MsD would be a great chatmod, he comes on chat(s) a lot and likes Lego a lot. He's been a great chatmod for other wikis (as ive seen) so I do think he should be a chatmod :) --Swiggity Swag What's In The Bag? (talk) 14:19, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  6. I like this fellow, and he makes quality edits. I believe he would make a good chat mod. --User:Dr. Satl, M.D.
  7. Looks good.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 17:49, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Just a few things he could improve on, but he's a positive influence on the community nonetheless. I'm neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:01, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Neutral as well. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:00, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  4. Per Meiko - wait a month or two ~ CJC 21:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Berry, and somewhat Dino. --Czech 22:19, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Leaning toward support, but I don't think he's quite there yet. I guess per Meiko. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:02, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Switching to neutral. --- Sci (talk) 19:12, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'm only here because it was linked in chat... it seems my vote issss neutral. Creeper S (talk) 19:32, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Even though he has improved and is also a helpful user, he could improve. (No hard feelings man.) --Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:51, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. He has been better in the last few weeks, but he does have a fairly recent history of trolling. --Berrybrick (Talk) 20:03, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  4. He seems like a user who would troll and spam, I just don't trust that he's mature enough for the Chat Mod right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  5. I really don't like taking part in these things, but I just have to say, this user is really obnonxious most of the time. The Doctor (Fantastic!)
    1. Seeing as how you're on chat for about once a week, and how you troll the LMBW constantly... MsDtalk 21:40, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
      1. Once a week? I was only on vacation this past week and I don't constantly troll LMBW.
        You always insist that everything I do is trolling LMBW and, like with everything else, get very annoying. I don't completely like the fact that you comment on an oppose. It's like you are trying to defend yourself from something that isn't worth defending yourself from. It doesn't assure me that you would be a decent mod. And as I said, you get annoying at times. The Doctor (Fantastic!)
        1. And this isnt the LMBW MsD so don't bring that wiki up here.. Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  6. Per above statements. --- Sci (talk) 19:12, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
    1. That seems a bit inadequate to me... Because he pointed out you're banned, you switched to oppose? --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:43, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

      1. Per Jeyo. Slashing. --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:47, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Per Berry's first message up above. -Legoboy 19:49, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. A few days ago he told me he was not going to use Brickipedia anymore because of two users. Unaccpetable IMO. --ToaMeiko (talk) 17:17, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • According to MsD, he has "quit" Brickipedia, and his reason is because he doesn't like two users. Should we go ahead and close/archive this? --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:03, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • I think so. --Jay 19:00, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • This is probably a more reasonable reason to close this. The chances he'll be able to be active are slim at this point. --ToaMeiko (talk) 17:17, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

CM4Sci

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful due to chatban

CM4Sci (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,670 edits, 412 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Seeing as it has been many many months since I last requested, I decided to give it another shot. It's been forever, and I can change. But none of you believe in me. Not much has happened, really. And there has been somewhat (in my opinion) an increase in nonsense in chat. One of the more "active" users, if that means anything. I've been waiting to do this, so let's see what happens! Yay! - Sci (talk) 22:08, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Yes. CM4S is amazing. -MassiveSodaDuck{{{1}}} 22:09, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Why not? In chat a lot, behaved as far as I can tell, etc. ~ CJC 22:15, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. CM4S is a good friend, and can take the responsibility, and is a chat mod that would not be boring. --Knight
  4. €ħɨþ-Ŧɦé-ΣǭuƖɲØж 05:36, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per CJC.

SKP4472 Talk 13,998 Edits! Welcome to Click a Brick! 10:47, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. um..........Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
    You've improved a lot for sure. You still occasionally are a bit rude to some users, but I think if you improve on the politeness/respect you deliver in chat, you'd be fine. You really need to do that before you earn these right though, since you can't act like that as a CM. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:22, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'll likely change to support later, as Sci was admin on Brickimedia's customs wiki and it didn't look like any harm came out of it. I'll admit, though, that there have been some moments of instability that I need to consider before changing. As such, I'm neutral for now. BrickfilmNut (talk) 00:51, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I honestly just still don't think CM4S is mature enough for this role, there is too much past evidence to say this is not a good position for him. --Czech 22:12, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sorry but your banned way to often, particularly by Cligra(if he was still here), and you technically are a sockpuppet, you get fustrated and start using caps lock when people call you Cody, even though it is your name and per Czech Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  3. From my neutral, you really need to be more polite and respectful to users. You swear way too much, and the frequent personal attacks are more than you can get by with. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:07, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. There was a rule that said that anyone who got a Warn2 or higher couldn't get any rights. From what I heard, you waaaaaay outstripped that. --Jay, keep calm, and sharpen your sword. 00:53, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
    There's never been a rule like that here. --- Sci (talk) 03:15, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
I thought I heard that somewhere... --Jay, keep calm, and sharpen your sword. 17:46, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  1. I can't bring myself to support. You have had chat mod, twice I think, and have had it stripped. Per Czech. --Berrybrick (Talk) 03:12, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
    Once. Middle of 2011, I think. --- Sci (talk) 03:15, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sci has recently been rather moody to say the least and has proven himself to be very volatile/violent and easily provoked. Oh, and the first three people to oppose -- Czech, Meiko and Soup -- you should not have been provoking him about the "dog running gag" like that. Instead, you could have been telling off those who started it/were also doing it. In other words, acting as a moderator should. (Though I'm not saying his reaction was in any way appropriate.) --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:51, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Was considering changing vote due to an incidence in chat, but in doing so, I'd also have to retroactively retract the support for the chat mods and users who it seemed to me intentionally provoked him (despite what I gather is an admin previously telling them to stop provoking him with that) to give them (and everyone else in chat at the time) a reason to oppose. ~ CJC 09:13, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • After a recent event, CM4S got himself banned from chat per consensus from myself and CzechMate. That voids this RfR, correct? --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:46, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • Berry confirmed on chat that this RfR will be archived as unsuccessful. -MassiveSodaDuck{{{1}}} 01:06, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


ToaThyre

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

ToaThyre (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hi! I think I should be nominated for a few reasons. First, I'm on chat pretty often, so I could moderate a lot. Second, I wouldn't abuse power or anything. Third, I think think I could really help keep chat safe. A few people probably will say I have trolled, and I might have. However I really feel I have changed. Please comment on anything on my talk page. Thanks for reading and considering! ToaThyre (talk) 18:54, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. Not sure who you are. Never seen you on chat despite claims you are there pretty often, which suggests either from Aus/NZ/Far East or a different definition of pretty often, never spoke to you. (And from what I gather below, joined today.) ~ CJC 21:57, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. You just joined today, for one thing. --Berrybrick (Talk) 18:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You didn't even format this right. MsD(talk)
  3. Per Berry. You should try for this later on. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:56, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. You just joined today, you have one edit and you have Toa in your name. :P --Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:03, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. You joined a few hours ago Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Comments

  • Be sure to read the RfCM checklist before adding a request. You don't qualify yet, but stick around and keep editing and you can file a new request later on. :) --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:08, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

SuperSpyX

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,701 edits, 1,987 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm not gonna be editing any more but I will be on chat. I definitely have gotten better, several users have said so. SuperSpyX1SuperSpyX2SuperSpyX3 19:46, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. He dosn't trust female users..., and I rarely see him on chat Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
Lol, what? --- Sci (talk) 15:06, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
He said we should watch female users , as there all rude or somthing along those lines Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
That was LOOOONG ago. I haven't said it recently. SuperSpyX1SuperSpyX2SuperSpyX3
It was in March.. Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls

Comments

NuffSaid

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

NuffSaid (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,171 edits, 181 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I want to be a chatmod (4th time's a charm... Right?) Well this time I really have changed. I helped others with LEGO related questions. I get along with others, I try very hard to not jump to conclusions. And all of us know LMBW invasions are in fact annoying. Those are 4 reasons why I really want to be chat mod and I really think I am ready for this position. Thinking with Bricks! 14:53, June 29, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid

Support

  1. I don't quite understand/relate to/agree with your fourth reason for running for chat moderator, but you have always behaved in chat and seem like you could handle it. BrickfilmNut (talk) 15:06, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You've matured, while still being the fun user you were before. I think you'd handle the rights well, especially since you're always on chat and don't pick random fights with people. -MassiveSodaDuck 22:29, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Sure. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:41, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per BFN. --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:43, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ToaMeiko (talk) 02:14, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Sure. --- Sci (talk) 15:21, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
  7. I always thought you should become a mod. Irnakk Council For Lordaeron!For-Lordaeron!
  8. Per Irnakk. -Legoboy 18:22, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  9. OK ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  2. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Oppose

Comments

  • Don't you need 100 edits mainspace? Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
    • I don't think it matters, that was the case for the last 3. Thinking with Bricks! 15:32, June 30, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
    • Even though Nuff hasn't made 100 mainspace, he's done a lot of customs, which is still a content namespace on the wiki. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:41, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Dino2012

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Dino2012 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm on chat a lot of the time, everyone knows me and I'm nice. Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:29, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • Not sure if he has changed since the instances I am about to mention, but I have seen several cases where he has disrupted chat and gotten into conflict with other users. He seems to be improving, but I'm not ready to support just yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:37, June 24, 2013 (UTC) Changed to "Oppose".
  • Don't really now you (Although if someone gives me the link to the logs of whatever day the below happened, may change to oppose) ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. You were making quite disgusting comments on chat a couple days ago, even when people and mods told you to stop, and then challenged Meiko for no reason. So no. -MassiveSodaDuck 21:22, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Has made some... questionable comments on the same day that he started running for chat mod. Don't feel he's quite ready yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 15:06, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  4. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Comments


TheBakonBitz

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

TheBakonBitz (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (666 edits, 100 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I've been on the wiki for about a year now and feel I've made some pretty quality edits. (Just over 500) Once Brickimedia was created most of the admins moved and Brickipedia was unprotected. After the recent fall of Brickimedia most of the admins left for good and Brickipedia is more prone to violators. I really want to help to bring Brickipedia back to top shape. Chat Mod will be the first step in stopping these violators and I hope to use these rights to stop as much as I can. TheBakonBitz My Talkpage 22:23, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I've never seen you on chat. -MassiveSodaDuck 22:27, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
    I go on chat quite often, but everyone is always AFK so I leave right away. I will definitely start staying on chat longer if this is a requirement for these rights. TheBakonBitz My Talkpage 22:31, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
    Think about it: Should someone running for chat mod be active on chat? --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:33, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per MsD I also really want to know people before I think they are ready. Thinking with Bricks! 22:29, June 29, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  3. Someone running for chatmod should definitely be active on chat beforehand... Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:42, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Ajr. :/ --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:43, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Berry Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  6. Per Ajr. -Legoboy 18:23, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Never seen on Chat. ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Who are you? Irnakk Council For Lordaeron!For-Lordaeron!
  9. Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal

Comments

  • Actually, chat is pretty secure.... --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:26, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

NuffSaid

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

NuffSaid1995 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think this may or may not be early or late but as a wise man once said "A wizard is never too late or early." But I'm not a wizard so let's put that comment aside. I believe I can be chat mod. I can help others and also have responsibility of the rights such as banning or kicking, but I could leave some of the banning to more CM's that have done it before. But I come to a case as stating on times that chat-mods are not on how can we stop a spammer or sockpuppet? Well you may want someone like me who is frequently on at early hours... I have stopped a sockpuppet (finnfan99/ComicsRus/GravityFallsFTW) I have somewhat come to a conclusion to say I may be mature enough for this role. But I guess the choice is for you, the staff and community to decide. So please be honest! Thinking with Bricks! 03:41, March 1, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid1995

HERE IS EVIDENCE OF ME CATCHING COMICSRUS: http://legodude101.wikia.com/wiki/Special:NewFiles

Support

  1. Changed to support. Nuff is definitely one of our most-mature non-mods, and has been here for a while. I have never had a problem with him on chat, and if the example he provided is true, I now feel confident enough to support. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  2. Changed to support if he really wants to stay here.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 04:24, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I think you are nice and are deserving of it. I am proud to support you! ~Cap.America
  2. Per everyone Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  3. EJsigfig58 croppedHunterkiller1440's guns are in here so you wanna just countinue your journey there.
  4. Youve been here for a long time. Ive known you for just a while, but i think you totaly deserve it. 20:42 Finnish time 18th of March 2013. User:Korppufin and lets see does my sig work enymore User:Korppufin/sig

Neutral

* Getting better but not quite. Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 22:10, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

  • I think he's a fine user and a really nice one.. but I don't feel like he is ready for this. I'm not going to oppose, so neutrality is where I'll stand. 'Nuff said. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:52, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Bug, mainly. I would kind of like to see some experience in dealing with trouble-makers with a lack of rights first. After that, I'd definitely support. :) -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
    • @BFN I have there are pics on Legodude101's wiki as I did catch a sockpuppet without having any rights.. He did tell me it was him though :


Soupperson1

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Soupperson1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (4,372 edits, 2,253 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think I could be a good chatmod. Chat's somtimes empty with no chatmods and alot of users(I'm usally one of them). I'm on chat all the time I can be, which is alot espically on weekends. I respect the rules and only broke them once (it was only a sentence in caps lock though, and I stopped when I was told). I have seen trolls (and other rude people) alot on other wiki's and know how to deal with them. I have helpt users before, they were small but every little helps. I have pings so if someone needs me they can just type soup. If I am away, I go away after not typing in 5 minutes it dosn't mean I'm not looking at chat. So feel free to vote either way, love to hear your opinion Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls 11:29, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Sure ~ CJC 11:33, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I don't see why not. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  3. Definitely! I'm sure the powers would be put to good use in Soup's control.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 18:02, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Jeyo. -Legoboy 18:13, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sure.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 19:09, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Definitely. One of the most sensible users on Chat. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  2. Per Cligra. --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:18, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per All. Thinking with Bricks! 23:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid1995
  4. Per everyone. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

SuperSpyX

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,701 edits, 1,987 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

From the urgings of several users I have decided to request Chat Mod rights again. I now act more mature and am nicer to new users. (Even Berry said I was doing better.) I have a good understanding of the new chat rules and would use them well. I am on chat quite a bit, (though a little less recently) sometimes when no mods are 44on. I hope you will consider my request and leave feedback and advice below.

SuperSpyX1SuperSpyX2SuperSpyX3 22:54, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Support

# NightblazeSaber 23:04, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Struck. Thought it was a no-brainer, but reading below, there may have been issues in the past. Not being in chat, I can't really judge whether the issues are relevant or not, so neutral. NightblazeSaber 06:14, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:54, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  2. What is the worse that can happen? ~ CJC 20:23, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. If the above three have read all below and support, then I might as well. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  4. ^ klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 23:50, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • You have been doing better, but I am not willing to support yet. That Aussie-stereotype episode was not long ago enough for me, aside from a few other things that I am not sure have changed, but no need to go into detail again. --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:28, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks...I guess. SuperSpyX1SuperSpyX2SuperSpyX3
      • It's not worth me getting angry over, but this is one of those "things". --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:01, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
        • I didn't mean that in a mean way. I'm sorry if you took it that way.
  • He has been better lately, but I haven't seen him on chat enough to be sure either way. I'm leaning toward support, though.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:04, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Per Jeyo. -Legoboy 08:25, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • Pretty much per Jeyo. I really haven't been on enough to know if he's been doing well enough. Drewlzoo
  • He was sexist once or twice to my friend recentley, if he stops i'll support, or if it was just a one time kinda thing Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  • Per Jeyo. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  • Neutral. He seems to generally be behaving fine, but I am not familiar with the events that the others are referencing, and therefore don't want to take a stance either way. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  • Going neutral, his been alright recently but I just can't seem to get myself to oppose or to support. Sorry SSX, but per Jeyo (And I'm NOT happy about the Aussie-stereotype video BerryBrick said above). -

Power Jim Talk Blogz07:09, 2/18/2013 07:09, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Not a very good history - has been banned twice in the last 6 months for being racist, and has a bad habit of being a show-off, and is not very mature, especially not enough for this role. --Czech 01:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
    Have you been on chat with him recently? He's been quite a bit better.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:21, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I have, and I see no major differences. --Czech 01:24, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Czech, BB, and Soup. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  2. He's shown signs of racism, sexism and likes to show off. The rest of this oppose has been rethought and revoked, though the rest still stands. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 19:09, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I think Spy isn't the worst, but he doesn't need mod rights. He's rarely on chat, he is definitely a show-off, and has been racist. So basically, per everyone. If I am still not ready for rights yet, he isn't either.

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not

    • And no, I'm not complaining about my lack of rights, just so you know.

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not

  1. Per everyone. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 17:36, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per everyone Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls

Comments

  • RFC ~ CJC 23:15, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Cap.America

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful (due to use of sockpuppet to support)

Cap.America (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (220 edits, 124 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been a member on Wikia for awhile. I meet all requirements of the guide. I would like to defend chat from wrong doers on the web. I have handeled them decently by telling them to stop. This does nothing at all. I would like to protect chat and NOT just have moderator rights. I love wiki, and I think it should have a few more guardians. Cap.America (talk) 16:29, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. From my opinion, user has clear expierence with chat and deserves rights. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 17:14, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Cap. is a good, dedicated user who has the experience, enthusiasm, and maturity required. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  3. Per above. --Irnakk
  4. Per all.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 18:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Klagoer, as long as you move with us. :P --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:29, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per all and hes nice too Soupperson1 Brickimediaz (take away the z) this is not an ad :PFriends girls
  3. Well as he told me in chat he tells spammers to stop and I saw he has done a lot of page edits.EJsigfig58 croppedHunterkiller1440's guns are in here so you wanna just countinue your journey there.

# Per everyone. ~BriBricks2000 (User is sockpuppet of Cap.America)

Neutral

  • Not sure. ~ CJC 21:30, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. He isn't on chat very much as far as I can tell, and I haven't seen him encounter spammers before. Basically, I don't know him well enough to see how he'd do with the rights. EDIT: He made a sockpuppet to support his nomination. My oppose is no longer a weak one.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Jeyo Stated my feelings perfectly. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. Per Jeyo, and I don't really feel comfortable about this. Also, he used a sockpuppet to support this, not exactly a mature thing to do. --Czech 22:30, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Brikkyy13

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful (due to block placed on the user's account)

Brikkyy13 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (956 edits, 280 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been part of this wiki for a few months now, and I am pretty active. I may only have a few mainspace edits, they are generally pretty good. The only edits that have been reverted are on The Mandarin, but that was sorted out. I have recently discovered chat. And though it benefits as a place to socialize, it also benefits as a tool to help users. If made a chat mod, I would make sure that all users who came there looking for help would get the answers they need, as well as making sure it is a safe place. Brikkyy13 (talk) 07:29, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

#As myself.(If I am not allowed to have a say please strike it out) BrikkyyTalk Extras! (Nominee cannot vote for self)

Neutral

  • I've never seen you on chat (I don't think) ~ CJC 17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Look - you're a nice friendly user Brikkyy, but I just have a few things to say: One, your mainspace edits do often need to be reverted, and mainspace has almost nothing to do with chat, two, you still don't really understand the whole of the wiki yet, such as editing the User rights request pages, and leaving "welcome" messages on new user talk pages. You are barely ever on chat, and definitely not ready, nor mature enough for the role, and need a lot more experience and maturity for any kind of right here, and you really do need to read some of the policies here. I would also like you to read some of the chat "rules" here, and read the checklist linked in this page. I really don't want to sound rash here, but these are my general points. --Czech 07:37, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • I didn't realize they were bad edits, and that was 1 user, and I thought it would save some other admins time.

BrikkyyTalk Extras!

      • Welcomes are done automatically by a bot ;) And there's nothing wrong with welcoming a new user with the template, provided that they have contributed to the wiki (ie, made at least one edit). (As far as the actual vote goes- neutral due to not being in chat) NightblazeSaber 07:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
        • To be honest, when I joined, I had no clue about it either :P --Czech 09:19, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Hm. Per Czech, I think. Let's give it some time. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  2. Per Cligra. -Legoboy 08:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Considering your reason for opposition to Nuff's request below, I don't feel like you would make that great of a mod right now. I mean, if you were opposing someone for copying an idea that was hardly original I can't help but wonder what reasons you would use the tools against someone and how little the reason might be. --Berrybrick (Talk) 15:55, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I just came across this too. My maturity concerns are increasing, even if you did remove it. --Berrybrick (Talk) 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Sorry Brikky, but I haven't seen you on chat enough. -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  5. Per Czech.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 22:18, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Chat mod is usually a daily, hourly thing.. it isn't exactly for people who are rarely on. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:47, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per everyone. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

Comments

  • Czech did say on his userpage "You can never have enough mods". Don't be a hypocrite...

BrikkyyTalk Extras!

    • That isn't necessarily being hypocritical. He doesn't support rabidly like you might expect someone who said that to do, but he is careful in voting. We have gotten people before who seem to think that as chat mod they have gained diplomatic immunity on chat which is not the case. I am not saying you would do that, but it is something we have to keep in mind. --Berrybrick (Talk) 15:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
      • I see users with rights not as "better users", but as users with extra features that help keep the wiki up to standard. as for chat mods, I see them as users who not only keep chat safe, but make sure any users who come there for help leave with the info they need. --Brikkyy13 (talk) 07:31, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
        • I think that what Czech meant was true. You can never have enough people who do their jobs well. If we had 100 Berrybricks, Jeyos, Cligras, CJCs, and pretty much every other great mods here, chat would be perfect. But since we don't, we are careful making sure we vote carefully. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!


Hi Strike Laser

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Hi Strike Laser (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (225 edits, 104 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Let's face it: I'm a newb. I am. But I edit roughly 50 a day, and have never been kicked, banned, or even said a single bad thing, whether to a user. Some people don't trust newbs, but let's face it: I'm nice, fun, and definitely not going to yell :) Don't judge a book by its cover :)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. He just joined today, and I honestly don't know him well enough to support... He seemed like he really wanted it, the first day he joined did 100 edits just so he could apply... IDK. Maybe give him longer, then reapply... Klintrin--Talk--Contributions
  2. You joined Bricki less than 48 hours ago. YOu made most of your edits today, usually adding 1 or two words/removing 1 or 2 words to a page. Sorry. Try again in a few months. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 02:19, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Please reapply later, you literally just joined and we haven't had time to.. "analyze".. you. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 02:21, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Bug.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:57, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per bug, but less creepy. --Czech 04:38, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Never seen him on chat, since he just joined two days ago. -Legoboy 10:39, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. No idea who this user is. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  4. Per Clone. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW

Comments

He actually didn't meet the required 100 mainspace edits. . . Try reapplying in around 1-3 months, you'll have a better chance then. :) Klintrin--Talk--Contributions

  • Perhaps while I was on an absence I didn't get this memo, but according to thsi page, Brickipedia:User rights/Requests, you don't need to have any edits and you must be on the wiki for at least 10 days. Normally, I would close this but since I am not sure about this is that, opposes don't have anything to do with requirements, and user doesn't even meet requirements. If I could have someone confirm this for me that would be great. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 02:31, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  • I would close it if I had the time. --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:32, January 2, 2013 (UTC)


Thorin II Oakenshield (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Thorin II Oakenshield (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (170 edits, 118 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am very mature on chat, have made 100+ Mainspace edits, and know what goes on around here (Maybe a little TOO much :P). There is nothing much else to say. So I am going to end it here. Thorin, At your service! 04:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. He is on chat a lot, and he has been there without any moderators when there has been a vandal. I think that these rights would be very useful for him. Full Support.Agent Charge Are you in? 06:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Heck, so have I. And I'm not the only one. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 18:15, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  1. The fact that he reads the logs makes me feel he is ready for any situation that could appear on chat. Per charge, Full Support -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. If you aren't trying to hide anything, then him reading the logs is fine

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 16:13, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  1. While what Jeyo said did waver my confidence in my decision a bit, my overall opinion of Thorin being a nice, mature user overweighs that point, so support. And about the chat log things: I don't see how that affects modship in any way. He'll still be reading the logs regardless. Denying him the rights won't do anything to change that. In other words, if you're concerned about him reading the logs, then talk to him about that and don't express your opinion in this way! And if you think the fact that him "stalking" you means that you simply aren't comfortable with him having the rights, I have to ask you, how serious could any power abuses on his part be and, more importantly, HOW ARE THE ABILITIES WE'D BE GRANTING HIM RELATED TO HIM READING THE LOGS?! -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
  2. Seems respectable LMFS (talk) 00:39, December 28, 2012 (UTC) (User is sockpuppet of the user requesting)
  3. I have only read this page about him, he seems well liked, made 100 Mainspace edits, and is being more mature then some mods here. This stalker thing is COMPLETELY immature. Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon (talk) 00:42, December 28, 2012 (UTC) (User is a sockpuppet of the user requesting)

Neutral

  1. I don't know. On one hand, he seems mature and has encountered spammers before. But on the other, he seems to want the position of Chat Mod very, very badly, more than most users. When told he had to make 100 mainspace edits before requesting again, he went around making one word edits that, while not bad, weren't that good either. He made the edits solely for the purpose of achieving Chat mod, it seems, as he previously stated that he "probably won't edit the wiki for a long time". There's also something else that makes me uneasy. I don't know what it is and I could be completely wrong, but it's just a gut feeling. So...yeah.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:57, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • I don't want mod rights THAT bad, but I think I deserve them. If I wanted to have them bad I would probably request them daily. Thorin, At your service! 16:38, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    And As for the one-word edits, I was fixing the grammar so they would be more understandable, and I edit because I want to, not for Chat-Moderator Desire, if that were the reason, I would have stopped at 100. Thorin, At your service! 16:48, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    That is a good point (the fact that he didn't stop). -- BrickfilmNut Productions!
    As for what I stated earlier, the not editing thing, I saw LOTS of pages that needed some editing, and decided to edit. I also said Probably. Thorin, At your service! 00:36, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
    If all Thorin wants to do on Brickipedia is go on chat, what is the problem with that? He went and made the 100 edits, and didn't just stop, showing that he does want them, and is willing to do work for them. Yes, some of his edits may not have been all that helpful, but how can you expect him to make perfect edits all along. After first joining, I was a sort of vandal (Although at the time I didn't know what what I was doing was bad), but now, a few years later, I'm an admin. Maybe later Thorin will be one of the main Brickipedians on the wiki. Who but God knows? I think that is good that he went and made the required edits–he wants the rights. Does it really matter the time that he did that edits in? If I wanted the rights, but didn't have the qualifications, I would probably do the same thing. Wouldn't you? And about reading the chat logs, isn't that what they're there for??????Agent Charge Are you in? 00:31, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
    (Check Brickiadmin.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 00:57, December 31, 2012 (UTC))

  1. I'm not sure on how to conflict and cross my previous support but Per Jeyo. If anyone can help show me the special thing that does that, please do. I'd like to talk to this user more.-LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
    Striked for you. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Neutral. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I already feel stalked when he reads every log of chat, which he says he's reading them all the time. For a MODERATOR to read the log every day, that just freaks the crap out of me.

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not(Vote struck, see comments)

  1. Why should it? There isn't anything wrong with it, technically.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:28, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Yes, he can read them, but for him to shout it out loud is kind of making me feel stalked.

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not

  1. So a non-mod can read the logs every day, but as soon as they become a moderator, that is just wrong. ~ CJC 11:30, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    No, he can read it, but he doesn't need to shout it out loud in chat.

Aldendan Knight Forever Knight Time! the question is: is or is not

  1. I don't "Shout it out loud in chat". Thorin, At your service! 16:53, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    Yes, you do. One day you came and said "Hello! I'm going to read the logs now!". I fell that you came just to say that as you didn't say anything else after that. -Legoboy 10:46, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I really think the user needs more time here. I know there isn't anything wrong with it - but it is really odd that he reads logs and enjoys them, I just don't like him reading stuff from before he joined. A month or two, and I'd probably support. Per Jeyo, too. --Czech 06:41, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. No. Just no. especially after he stalked me. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW(Vote struck, see comments)
  4. Per Czech. -Legoboy 09:28, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  5. No Because when i see him he is on the Chat for maybe 30 - 60 minutes a day, and most Chat Mods are on 2 - 15 hours a day Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
    • I'm not. It's more like a half hour for me...

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 16:14, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

    • If mods really were on 15 hours a day, That would be sad. Thorin, At your service! 16:45, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
      Well not 15, but I stay at least for 1 or 2, and sometimes a lot more. -Legoboy 10:49, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  1. He seems like a kind of nice user but the way he reads the logs and likes to tell us stuff that he shouldn't even know that he's learnt from reading them makes me think that he's not mature enough to be a chat mod, if he were to read the logs and not be creepy about it I might support. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    • CGCJ, I do not "Like to post what I read" I did ONE time when I was new. Thorin, At your service! 00:38, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I might have voted support had I not read Jeyo's neutral vote. -NBP 14:40, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech and NBP. I don't trust the guy seeing that he WANTS to be a chat mod and reads logs, gives me the creeps, so until it's confirmed that he is an normal guy who is actually a fan and not a stalker, I say nay.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man! Legospidey(Vote struck, see comments)
    • I am a LEGO Fan, not a stalker, and if I did not want the rights, why am I running? Why did ANYONE run if they did not want the rights? Thorin, At your service! 17:31, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
      1) I still don't know if you're a stalker or not, liars lie. 2) most of the time people are nominated because the deserve/earned it, not want it.- Jedi master sith Spider Talk Ultimate Spider-Man! Legospidey
  4. Per Czech and Clone. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 18:16, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Though, I do not know him to well, I will say I don't think a "mature" chat-mod needs to question or make comments when it comes to opposes. I would support but I have read other opposes/neutrals and I think these people have a point (And no I don't care he reads the logs). Also after had reading Jeyo's great input, I will say Oppose. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 01:16, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Per NBP and Klagoer's first sentence. --Berrybrick (Talk) 00:30, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
  7. He's banned indefinitely for being the sockpuppet of a user who is constantly causing trouble. There is no way that he is getting moderator rights. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 18:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Really, I don't know whether to scold or laugh at this "stalking" business. He was not stalking you. I read the chat logs often as well, actually. Was he asking for your name or personal info? Because that's what I call stalking, not reading the logs and telling everyone about it. EyerollEmote-2

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 07:13, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • And even then, I don't tell people what I read. I did one day, but not anymore. Thorin, At your service! 16:52, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm laughing because of how terrible these opposes are. Reading chat logs =/= stalking? You all know that whatever you post on chat will end up in the logs, and that anyone can read them. The fact someone is reading them doesn't make them the one at fault. If you are worried about what he might read in the logs, then be more careful about what you post on chat... ~ CJC 11:29, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    NBP actually had a good reason to oppose. Thorin, At your service! 16:39, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    When I wrote this, NBP hadn't opposed... ~ CJC 18:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Jeyo and CJC. If he specifically went after you and then asked for personal info, that's stalking. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  • Note - if another admin disagrees, feel free to undo my strikes, but for the record, I've struck the opposes that basicly just say "He reads logs, therefore he is a stalker". Unless you have actual proof for him being a stalker, I fail to see how him reading the chat logs can be considered a valid reason to oppose. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

And also -- per DH and CJC. If people are getting freaked out by the fact that he reads the logs, then logic dictates there's a reason. What are people saying on chat that they don't want everyone to know? Just something to think about. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:06, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • I'm finding his replies to users opposes rather immature, just the way it seems like he's whining or trying to argue a point that's not needing to be argued. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    It was neither whining or arguing a point, I was just stating what actually happened, some things were either misstated, or misunderstood. Thorin, At your service! 23:35, December 28, 2012 (UTC)


Thorin II Oakenshield

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Thorin II Oakenshield (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (170 edits, 118 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am responsible, mature, know a lot about this wiki and how things go on chat, I am there when some are not. I have dealt with spammers, no mods or admin were there, because we need more. I think I would be great for the job. Thorin, At your service! 04:15, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I'd LOVE to support you. You're a great guy. I've seen you on chat, and you are responsible and polite, but I just can't, as you don't fit the criteria. You just need those 100 mainspace edits, and then I'll give you 100% support. Again, I'd love to support you, but I just can't. Sorry. –Agent Charge Are you in? 07:54, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Charge. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  3. Per Charge ~ CJC 16:23, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Almost per Charge, just replace that second-to-last sentence with the second part of Jeyo's first. --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:45, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Charge, mostly. -Cligra Join the redlink war!

Oppose

  1. Thorin seems like a decent user, but he hasn't been here long enough. Additionally, he has yet to make a single mainspace edit. I can see him with the rights in the future, but not now.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:16, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

  1. No idea who this user is. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per Clone. I saw him a few times but I barely know him. Last time he was stalking us though.. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
    He wasn't stalking you. Is there a problem with reading Brickipedia's archives? I've read quite a few myself.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:11, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Same here.--BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:15, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  2. No, NO EDITS, and was trolling on chat --—TX24 (talk) 22:36, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
    Are you sure that was me? I don't troll. Thorin, At your service! 05:00, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
    Sorry, I meant spamming. --—TX24 (talk) 01:26, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
    I don't spam, either. Thorin, At your service! 01:50, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Sorry to break this to you, but I believe you have to have been a user for at least one month and have made at least 100 edits. :( I'm sure you'd do a great job, but you don't meet the requirements. --50.99.246.31 04:37, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think he has been here for at least a month. He knows every single answer to anything I have asked him. He knows who everyone is and all about them. His knowledge seems to extend for about 5 months. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  • Perhaps he was a wikia contributor for that time? Because when I go to his profile, it says, "13 EDITS SINCE JOINING THIS WIKI DECEMBER 9, 2012". :/ BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:39, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't know. He stayed up all night to read practically every forum and fact about every editor on the wiki. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
    He's been reading the old chat logs, I personally find that a bit creepy as I'd rather have him learn stuff from his experiences not the past before he joined. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • (Edit conflict with CGCJ) Wow, he's certainly dedicated. :P I do think he'd do a great job, I just don't know how often users here make exceptions for this kind of thing.--BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:45, December 11, 2012 (UTC)


TX24

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

TX24 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (101 edits, 40 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I was Conservative Christian Rep, but changed. I just wanna be a mod. I was inspired to do so when I saw all the spammers at late night. I would like to be A mod. Also, I have been on chat 10+ days and have started editing more recently

Thanks, --—TX24 (talk) 20:31, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Seems like a good user, but he needs to have been here longer. I'd wait for a few months.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:34, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

  1. No, definitely not been on here long enough and I don't know the user well enough. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Too soon. ~ CJC 20:39, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Was kind of rude to me lately. Plus, too new. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 20:41, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Too new.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 20:42, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Per all above. Thorin, At your service! 03:40, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yes, I agree, I am too new. I will wait a while --—TX24 (talk) 21:05, December 13, 2012 (UTC)


LEGO2013Helper

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

It's been a while, and I think I've got the responsibility. I've been acting nicely lately, and I've seen some of the rules have changed, and they look a lot easier. I can handle it. It's not like I'm running for admin. If I have to, I can wait another few weeks. LEGO2013Helper (talk) 03:02, November 15, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. No. CM4S, no. You're lucky to still be here, you could have easily been blocked again. Not mature enough, langauge, and he has been banned 14 times prior. --Czech 03:05, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:06, November 15, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Per Czech. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 03:11, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Yeah, that's happening. As I've already said everything on this subject that I care to, I'll just copypaste my comments from July:
    Really? Again? The user has always been immature, acerbic, depressive, and frequently just downright rude and annoying. Admittedly, I haven't spoken to him much recently, but the two times I have he has been quite unpleasant. Also, I hate to bring this up again, but he was "permanently" banned from Chat just a few months ago, and was banned, what, thirteen times before that? As a side note, do we really want as a Chat Moderator someone who is so narrow-minded that they defend their tastes in My Little Pony when someone even implies that they don't like the show, but can't begin to comprehend why someone might like Friends, to the extent of being actively rude to them if they, say, create a News Blog about the theme? -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  3. The IP does sum it up pretty well. Anyway, I'd describe CM4S' behavior like this: When he is good, good for him. When he is bad, bad for us all. --Berrybrick (Talk) 11:28, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Don't get me wrong, I like CM4S. But I've also seen how he's acted in the past in chat. Honestly, I think he's lucky to even be allowed in chat after some of those incidents. NightblazeSaber 11:34, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I think we can all say that CM4S has improved. That's great! But CM4S, wait at least a few more months. If you are continually good, then my opinion might change to a support. I'm really happy with how you have acted lately. Keep it up! -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  6. Per Czech. And I just realized that he's CM4S... -Legoboy 15:45, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per others, really nice user, just can't trust with rights. On a side note I did not know this was CM4S's new name :p --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 17:03, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Per Czech. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
  9. Per Legoboy9373 --Boromircgi Legodude101 Talk They have a cave troll!?!
    # Nope. User:Combo Breaker/sig (Please provide a reason when opposing nominations)
    Reason? --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 04:48, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
    Only admins can strike votes... --Czech 04:52, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
    Struck. Everyone happy now? ;) NightblazeSaber 04:55, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
  10. No, definitely the last person I'd ever want as a mod. Sure he's been good but it's only a matter of time before he loses it and is permanently banned again, it's happened too many times. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  11. Per LazerzSoH

Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon Talk Ninja...GO!!

Comments

  • Wow. People sure are going on about this CM4S. When I encountered CM4S, there were not problems with him. Although he once kicked me for talking to much about Adventure Time >.>. Or was that DH? Oh well :P. Point is, I think people are being a bit too harsh. Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 Talk Banana Man does not approve.

Images-770


I'm thinking of SNOW closing this nomination. True, it's only been a few days, but just about everyone who normally votes on these things has already placed their views here. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Closed - WP:SNOW ~ CJC 16:29, November 20, 2012 (UTC)

Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think I should become a Chat Mod because I have experienced four spammers over the months, and I have been on chat every single day since I joined, except one. 2000 - The futuristic sound of Balloon Music (talk) 08:40, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. This user is very mature and friendly. He also is on when most mods and admins are not,and on those times,spammers come to spam on chat. Full support! Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
  2. I honestly can trust 2000 with this, and there are always others to help him out. --Czech 09:01, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I was actually about to ask to nominate this user for chatmod. I think 2000 has developed a lot recently both in maturity and skills on chat. This here is a very friendly and trustworthy user. :) -

Power Jim Talk Blogz09:46, 11/4/2012 09:46, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I think he would do an amazing job. Per Jim. :)

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 14:15, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I'm going to trust everyone on this. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. Yes, he's definitely mature and experienced enough for the job. He's also on chat at a time when most others are not.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:13, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

  1. He think he should. He's really nice. DIN0
  2. He Deserves the rights. He is nice and mature! Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon (talk) 06:27, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Can't say much. Sure he has been on chat a bit, but never paid attention. ~ CJC 20:47, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per CJC. -Legoboy 17:42, November 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Maturity concerns and not sure if the user needs the rights. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments


Bob Bricks

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawn

Bob Bricks (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (990 edits, 31 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Hello, i'm Bob Bricks! Many of you know me, i'm asking to request these rights because I think that i'm more mature than before, thanks!

19:49, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I've seen nothing to make me think that he wouldn't do what he did again. Besides, it was only about a month ago, so I think it is too soon. (I do have a bad sense of timing though. :P) --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:51, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Far too soon and I am yet to see that he's "matured" Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. Per Berrybrick and Clone gunner commander jedi. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  4. Not mature enough, and I am not impressed with this user. --Czech 21:52, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Czech. -Legoboy 07:53, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Awesomeknight1234

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (6,176 edits, 556 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Before any of you oppose, I hope you read this instead of coming up with an insignificant reason for doing so. Awesomeknight is a great friend and user who was one of our better mods when he had the rights. I'm sure some of you are confused as to why he had the rights removed, but honestly, it wasn't as big of a deal as it seemed. But I might as well explain why Knight had these rights removed, to keep this nomination legitimate.

  • A user (Whom I will be keeping anonymous, just in case.) was causing havoc and angering various users, which included Knight. Even I was being bothered by this user, on occasion. Although it continued, there wasn't much we could do as he wasn't personally attacking anyone directly or anything else ban-worthy. This was very confusing to us and it never ceased, simply dragging on.
  • Knight, not realizing the jeopardy it would cause, spammed the user's wiki with hate messages. Admittedly, he told me and I never even considered the risk he was taking. I don't wish to be blamed, but do take in account that he told multiple people who could have easily stopped him. I would also like to point out that this message is known as "The World's Worst Insult" (Not as bad as it sounds.) a well-known internet meme, not something he came up with to directly insult the user.
  • Although we are not supposed to take into account of users' actions on other wikis, the administrators thought this threat was a little much and somewhat ridiculous. I'm not trying to say their judgement was wrong, but maybe it would be better if it remains temporary and we let Knight regain his user rights.

So, if you think Knight deserves these rights, go ahead and support. If you don't, feel absolutely free to oppose. Or just stay neutral. Whichever way you choose, please consider the above. As far as I know, I didn't leave out any major details that could change your decision.

Knight supports this, but I am the one who is "nominating" him. If anything, don't shoot this down because you think he wanted me to do it. </textwall> βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Knight may have strong opinions as stated below, but I think he's working on that and in time, he might overcome it. When he spammed the other wiki, I really don't think he'd do it again. I feel personally that he needs to mature a little more before he receives the rights after hearing everyone's opinion.
  • I also want to add that Knight has done a lot of good on this wiki, overall :). After another few months, I will see about how he has matured. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!

Oppose

  1. I don't care if it was a meme or what it was. It was nasty. Also, we try to stop spam, not promote it.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 22:48, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I am pretty sure I know who you are talking about, and I had half a mind to block him for lying about certain things, but what Knight did was still wrong. Per Henry about the meme. Yes, you are right that what happens on one wiki is not supposed to effect what happens on another, but vandalism is vandalism anywhere and it shows that when a person doesn't feel like they are being watched, they are perfectly fine with breaking rules. They should not be blocked here for it, but it makes it harder to trust them. --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:56, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Well, here's the thing. You've brought up, and (almost) justified one of the two reasons everyone has opposed him before. However, you've completely ignored the second, which is, to the best of my knowledge, still relevant. I will lay it down thus: Knight has strong opinions. There's nothing wrong with this. The problem, however, arises whenever anybody happens to talk about something he doesn't like for one reason or another. (the two main offenders being "Kingdumbs" and "Minecrap".) While Knight is perfectly amicable most of the time, it is impossible for him to let other people's views on the subjects he dislikes (that is, the fact that other actually like them) lie unchallenged, and he will get into long and pointless arguments on the subject. For an example, see this blog. Incidentally, this other blog was posted relatively recently, but, to the best of my knowledge, he hasn't really stopped this habit much, although he does usually manage to be quiet when people speak on Chat. Still, is somebody who finds it "hard for me not to insult them while the conversation is going" somebody we want with the ability to ban people at will, even if he has developed the maturity to admit it?
Also, it is worth noting that, when Knight had ChatMod powers before, he was involved in the great "Let's ban the Chatlog Bot" plot that led to the bot gaining chatmod rights to prevent banning. I don't actually really remember much about the incident, but it is worth note. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  1. Per everyone above, I don't see him being tolerant enough to be acceptable to have the right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. PA. ~ CJC 23:15, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. You've brought up some of the bad parts of Knight in those statements, and remember - bombs are a real threat in modern society. The amount of times he'll do something immature is high, and the blogs about Kingdoms, and other stuff he doesn't like. I'd like a mod to be more tolerant of things, or statements they disagree on. His strong opinions are known to hurt feelings - face it: The world doesn't revolve around you and your opinions. He's vandalised a wiki, sure, maybe not a big one, but is was for revenge, which cannot be tolerated. And Cligra's statement about the "ban the chat bot" is bad too, the bot just logs chat. Being blocked for that PA against CJC, too. I just cannot support this request. --Czech 00:39, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Okay, the only offense I was aware of was the one I covered above. If anything, this should be ended now, as I had no clue about the PA towards CJC or the other issues. And yes, Knight does has very biased opinions, but hating on certain subjects (Such as Kingdoms) isn't a very relevant point toward the opposition of this appeal, though subject to controversy. The people who let the arguments go on are just as relentless when it comes to their side. Like I said above, I was very unaware of most of these offenses and don't want to drag this on further. Please, by all means, close this. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 18:16, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
  1. Per everyone. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW --Long Live The Ewoks! (the caps sound cool in that way :P )

Comments

  • This is beyond embarrassing, as I had no idea about a lot of this stuff. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 18:37, October 28, 2012 (UTC)


IMFAgent1

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

IMFAgent1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (865 edits, 99 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I would like to become a chat mod because I have been on Brickipedia for a while now and I see how chat works. Also, I think I have matured more and I think I am ready for the rights. IMFAgent1 20:34, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I don't see you on chat much. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

# Per Clone. -Legoboy 17:30, September 4, 2012 (UTC) (Moved to Oppose)

Oppose

  1. For one thing I spent ten minutes of my life fixing this page because of his signature, but I aslo don't feel he is mature enough yet for these rights. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 22:45, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Not on enough, lack of experience as a chat mod, and not mature enough. --Czech 04:14, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech. -Legoboy 13:00, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per Czech. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
  5. I know Mainspaces don't have anything to do with becoming a mod, but... 99. And I've never seen you on chat before, and I've been on for every day since I joined Brickipedia. Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 Talk Banana Man does not approve.

Images-770

  1. I would support you, but you're not that active these days. Dr Nefarious He is watching you... -Dr. Nefarious
  2. PA. ~ CJC 10:49, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • At the moment, I don't know where to stand. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz11:24, 9/6/2012 11:24, September 6, 2012 (UTC) *I know Mainspaces don't have anything to do with becoming a mod, but... 99. And I've never seen you on chat before, and I've been on for 1 month, 8 days straight. Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 Talk Banana Man does not approve. Images-770 (Moved to oppose)


Finnfan99

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was SNOW close

Finnfan99 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

i want to become chat mod because i wont abuse the power of the chat mod and ill help others

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Maturity concerns and he has no need for the rights. He has also recently been banned from chat for acting up.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Per Jeyo, and I personally have never seen him on chat before today. Munchman14
  2. Per Jeyo. ~ CJC 23:17, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Maturity concerns, and like Jeyo said, no need for them. --Czech 23:24, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I'm on chat with him right now. Per Jeyo. >_> --Berrybrick (Talk) 23:42, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I'm really gonna oppose this. He's very immature, and he was rude to a lot of users on a majority of wikis he's been on. I'm sure he doesn't need any rights right now. :/ --Prototron (talk) 00:06, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Per Jeyo and BB.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 00:12, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I've never seen him in either the recent activity or the chat. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 01:11, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I oppose, I'm not too trustworthy of him yet. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz12:30, 8/9/2012 12:30, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • This request got three opposes within the first 10 minutes of it's introduction. :/

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • He doesn't have the required 100 edits. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 15:07, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • SNOW closed. ~ CJC 15:26, August 9, 2012 (UTC)


Dataman1

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success, per CJC in comments

Dataman1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,190 edits, 497 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I'm requesting these rights because I think I can help with chat. I've seen pretty much everything there is to see on the chat, from spamming to swearing. I've been kicked for being disruptive and banned for being rude, but I will do my best to help on chat. I will do my best not to abuse these rights. Please consider my request. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 16:57, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've seen him on a lot, and he seems mature enough. --Munchman14 16:58, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I'm supporting. :) -Legoboy 17:37, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Improved a lot recently :) ~ CJC 21:20, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I wouldn't mind him as a mod, but he's just got to remember that if he does get it, to be very mature. --Czech 23:23, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  5. He deserves it. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 16:36, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Yes.-LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 22:07, August 16, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  7. Definitely! Great user and great on chat! Very responsible and well mannered! Creeper S (talk) 23:11, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I have been on 1 chat with him but, his attitude showed that he is ready to be a mod.

IMFAgent1 Talk Page Customs

Neutral

  1. Seems like a nice user, but I don't know him well enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 16:59, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

  1. He hasn't done it too recently, but I don't appreciate the comments I've seen him make about CJC to new users. --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:38, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I really don't know.. I don't see him on enough. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  3. Per LSC and Jeyo, just simply don't know him that well. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz12:31, 8/9/2012 12:31, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I gotta admit, I didn't do my research. Looks like he's been banned and warned about attacking other users. I just don't think we should reward this kind of behavior. In time if he proves himself, possibly, but for now I must oppose.--Munchman14 18:04, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Same here! I just saw what he did... Sorry, man! -Legoboy 18:08, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. A bit of a hothead.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 17:46, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

#Per Munch -

(Administrator struck: Reason: user does not meet the editing requirements to vote)

  1. I would not be able to trust him with the right, also he came on earlier and immediately started an argument. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

  • As Berrybrick said above, I have made rude comments about CJC to newbies. I don't deny it. I regret doing it in the first place. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 17:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure ~ CJC 21:23, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


Stormbringer Empire 791

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Stormbringer Empire791 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (964 edits, 325 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Storm is alwas on chat and he is very mature. He is a good fellow and never rude. Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I full-heartedly support this, such a mature user and he who could use these rights well. Good luck :) --Czech 02:04, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech --ComicsRus (talk) 05:05, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per above LMFS (talk) 04:07, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Holy canoly yes! :D Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
  5. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 13:50, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  6. I'm surprised that he's not a mod already. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 15:23, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per Darth's reason for nominating. He has also matured a lot recently.

<s>Jeyo</s> Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Would make a great Chat Mod. Creeper S (talk) 23:15, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Friendly, mature, and always on a lot. Deserves this. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  3. Per Dataman. --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:32, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I support him all the way.

IMFAgent1 Talk Page Customs

Neutral

  1. I have conflicting opinions on this. On one hand, he's been here a long time and seems trustworthy, but on the other, I don't think he's quite ready for the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. I've seen him only twice on chat and I don't really know what to say. -Legoboy

Oppose

  1. I know that this will mean nothing but, Tbh I don't think he's anywhere near ready for the rights. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per Jeyo, except something is telling me to put it here instead. ~ CJC 19:02, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Accepted though PM.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)


Legoboy9373

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Legoboy9373 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (15,251 edits, 10,365 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I want to be a chat moderator, because I think I can be helpful, also I think I have good grammar and I'm on chat a lot of time during the day. If you think so please support me. Thank you for your time! :) -Legoboy

Support

  1. Yes. Irnakk Talk And the Empire will be defeated by Ewoks! Wicket W. Warrick SW
  2. You could use these rights. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 16:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Very mature user, and I know this guy well from his chat talks, definite support --Czech 23:20, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Mature user, just found out we're in severely different timezones, as me being on 2:30 AM while it's morning for him. Also Per CP. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  5. I dont know you that well or enything but i think you can do it so i will support you User:Korppufin/sig 16:51, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Very mature and ready for the responsibility.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 00:11, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Partly per Munchman, but what it boils down to for me being neutral is that I don't recall seeing you on chat. --Berrybrick (Talk) 16:55, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Actually, I was mistaking this user for another with the immaturaty. Seems nice, but I don't see him on all that much. If others want him to be a CM, I would have no problem with it. --Munchman14 18:16, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't recall you on chat much. (But maybe I'm not just looking hard enough). ~ CJC 21:19, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • ^ klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 16:37, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Though I am usually on chat pretty late and I have seen him before, I'm not sure if he needs the userrights yet, we have so many moderators already. I'm only staying in neutral territory because we could use more mods around that time. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 19:50, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
*^ Per all above ^ -

(Struck by an administrator: Does not meet minumum edit count in mainspace.)

*Per Bug. Clone gunner commander jedi talk (Vote changed to oppose)

Oppose

#Eh, not too sure. Seems immature, never seen the user on chat, and seems to not know about how the wiki operates (Spam warnings, etc.). All in all, if I see the user on chat more and given greater experience, I would support, but for now, I must oppose. --Munchman14 16:52, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I've observed that he can scorn or admonish other users' altercations without trying to resolve the problem.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 16:58, August 8, 2012 (UTC) #Per Jeyo. Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 18:21, August 8, 2012 (UTC) #Per Jeyo. I don't see him on often. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

  1. Per Jeyo. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

  • Big thanks to those who supported me, and Munchman and Jeyo, you live in the USA and I live in Europe (Bulgaria) which is 12 hours difference, so you can't blame me for not being on chat in your day. It's evening here in Bulgaria now and it's morning in most of the states in the USA. I'm on chat about 4 out of 12 hours. So please ask someone else who lives in Europe. And if I become a Chat Moderator I'll stay more time on chat and be helpful. :) -Legoboy
  • Request for Closure ~ CJC 21:23, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


CM4S

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

CM4S (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (5,669 edits, 1,003 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

CM4S is respected by (most) users, he's kind and tolerant to new users when some individuals are not. He has had Chat Mod rights in the past and he used them well; I believe it was merely an unfortunate incident which caused the removal. A handful of users I know want to see them re-instated.From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:07, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As Nominator --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:07, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Per Cligra last time. But really, he is overly dramatic and hasn't changed much. He was personally attacking CzechMate, again, just Sunday. --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:08, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per above. Dataman-logo-bluetalk 19:12, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Munchman14

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Munchman14 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,656 edits, 2,009 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I have been on this wiki for a while and used to have CM rights but left unexpectedly and lost them. I am currently a Patroller and Rollback and am just looking to get them back since I'm back for good and have more time on my hands. I use chat frequently and do occasionally notice people posting links to inappropriate websites. Thank you for your time. Munchman14Dino-attack-logo 01:26, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Munchman is a user I knew back in my Crazed Penguin era, and is still one of the best users on this site, I'd fully trust him with chat mod again. --Czech 05:29, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Great user. More mature then some of our current mods... klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 14:25, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech and Mr. M.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 01:21, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Yeah, just be on chat lots. :-) ajr 06:38, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. He is definitely mature and fair enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Very mature, just per ajr, be on chat a lot :) Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  2. Support. 1 question, how did Czech go from Crazed Penguin to Czech Mate?-LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 20:26, July 31, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

Neutral

  1. Seems like a nice user, but I don't know him well enough yet.

<s>Jeyo</s> Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Per Jeyo, I don't usually see him on.... Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  2. Never seen the ser on chat. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
    Correction: user Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
    Typo. :P Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  3. Per Jeyo -

  1. Per Mr. Minifigure, but he only just got back from being inactive for nearly a year. I just think that he should wait a couple of weeks. --Berrybrick (Talk) 14:42, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry. He will get definite support from me in a week or two. :D Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
  3. I have no idea who this users is, only seen them on chat once.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  4. Per CGCJ LMFS (talk) 18:50, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Everything I've seen of the user makes me want to support him, but I've never actually met him. Drewlzoo
  6. Per Drewlzoo. Weeping Angel Don't even blink

Oppose

Comments

*Ok, I withdraw my current nomination until a couple weeks. Thank you for your consideration.--Munchman14Dino-attack-logo 20:46, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

  • I wouldn't. At the rate your going, you should get modship in a few days, maybe a week.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Ok, whatever you say. I'll still stay nominated. --Munchman14Dino-attack-logo 01:05, July 27, 2012 (UTC)


CM4S

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not Done

CM4S (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (5,669 edits, 1,003 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Well.. I've been back for a while. I've been doing well on chat (people have told me) and.. yeah. Recently, there have a been a lot of mishaps on chat, and no mods have been there, we keep shouting and they don't do anything. I really can't think of anything else to say, but.. :) CM4S (talk) 16:53, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Very mature and nice user perfect for chat mod rights -

<s>Jeyo</s> Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Please give a reason (preferably a valid one). --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:05, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. User can be mature at times, but often has a problem with caps.... Sorry. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but even though you have been good, if the past is anything to go by you'll keep it up for a while and then have (an) episode(s). I just can't fully trust you with your history. --Berrybrick (Talk) 17:04, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Really? Again? The user has always been immature, acerbic, depressive, and frequently just downright rude and annoying. Admittedly, I haven't spoken to him much recently, but the two times I have he has been quite unpleasant. Also, I hate to bring this up again, but he was "permanently" banned from Chat just a few months ago, and was banned, what, thirteen times before that? As a side note, do we really want as a Chat Moderator someone who is so narrow-minded that they defend their tastes in My Little Pony when someone even implies that they don't like the show, but can't begin to comprehend why someone might like Friends, to the extent of being actively rude to them if they, say, create a News Blog about the theme? -Cligra Join the redlink war!

Comments


Legofan100

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not Done

Legofan100 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (437 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Support

  1. great user very mature.

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Hardly ever on chat and not too sure about there maturity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments


Legoisawesome

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Legoisawesome (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

hi I'm Legoisawesome i want to be chat mod cause there can be ruckas at like 3 in the morning and i always try to stop the arguments in the day which usually stop and this is the reason i want to be a chat mod . Legoisawesome (talk) 03:12, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

#User has potential in the future, but am unsure on maturity. He appears to be active on chat, however. Doesn't have much experience. I will stay in the middle. If he requests in a few months, I will easily change my mind. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo

Oppose

  1. v Per Czech

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Nowhere near mature enough, have serious problems with this users ability to interact with others. And please stop requesting rights when you've just joined. :S --Czech 05:19, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per all. Sorry. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  3. Per above
  4. Been here less than a week? ~ CJC 13:52, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Change of vote. Sorry but... I did not realize the lack of time he's been here. And, I have noticed much lack in maturity. Sorry. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
  6. Per all. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  7. When the Vorenus incident occured, you didn't seem very mature. I am not so sure maybe try again later. Per all. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 18:07, July 24, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  8. I read over logs, shows your not mature enough. -

  1. Per above. --Munchman14Dino-attack-logo 02:31, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Agreed. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
Yes,please. :P Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring


LMFS

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawal

LMFS (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (213 edits, 39 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am nice. I am mature. I would understand if you opposed. But I will not be held back from being a Brickipedian. LMFS (talk) 05:27, July 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I wasn't there when he was last banned,but I'm not really sure. He can be nice sometimes, but I think he needs to wait a couple more weeks. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring

Oppose

  1. Not mature enough, banned from chat far too many times, and requested rights too many times. --Czech 05:47, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech, definitely no mature enough.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 15:43, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Not mature, and has been banned from chat very recently. --Munchman14 16:52, July 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I have to agree, Czech. I was banned from chat a few times. I ran too many times. But now, I am turning over a new leaf. LMFS (talk) 05:49, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Time will tell. You have to prove it. We can't just take your word for it. --Berrybrick (Talk) 15:17, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Ya, only time will tell if you really are turning over a new leaf. Just wait a few weeks and who knows, you may get ChatMod rights afterall.
  • Thank you for your advice! I am turning over a new brick, but I DO feel I need to wait. I will grow mature. Thanks you all! (Now can someone please remove my request?) LMFS (talk) 18:36, July 28, 2012 (UTC)


Wertys761 (3)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,260 edits, 377 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I tried in the past, it failed. I tried again recently, it was closed due to canvassing. And now, I'd like a third go. :D Third times a charm.

I feel I am responsible and ready for these rights.

Support

  1. Of course. He is mature, friendly and could use the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  2. Per Jeyo -

  1. Mature, and has what it needs to take. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 02:09, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Definite Support from me, mature user and could use the rights. --Czech 02:14, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I can't come up with a good support statement, so basically I just trust him. :P Drewlzoo
  4. Mature, friendly user, and on a lot. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits
  5. Acctually, after seeing how good he is in chat properly --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 07:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Would support but because he was canvassing, Neutral.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 03:24, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

  • ~ CJC 10:00, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

SKP4472 Talk 13,998 Edits! Welcome to Click a Brick! 10:08, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

#maturity concerns (highlighted by the canvassing) and I don't see how he would needed the rights --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 14:08, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Well, then you should know that there was a time when all the mods on chat were doing other things and a spammer came on. Wertys and CM4S could do nothing but try to get the mods to pay attention to chat while this guy did as he pleased. I happened to come on at that moment and stopped him, but the point is that if Werty or CM4S were mods, they could have done something. Another thing: When Wertys is on chat, he's on chat. some people come onto chat and then ignore it mostly. That's one of the reasons I supported. He could use the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Besides canvassing, I think of myself as pretty darn mature. I didn't even know I was canvassing. I was simply telling people: "Either support or oppose" and then I gave them the link to this. I understand that its canvassing now, I've learned from my mistakes, and I'm ready to move on. I find myself pretty mature. But, if you think I'm not, I completely respect that. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
Sorry I don't think you are quite ready, wait month and I will change but you are nearly there --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 17:29, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Man... that "canvassing" from last request is really haunting me... lesson learned. 8-)


vorenus22

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

vorenus22/CC-1119 Appo (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Vorenus22 is a great and nice user. he cares for others, he help others in need, many of you may know him. Many of you may think he is "inexperianced", but he's not, and he is my Friend. -βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. *cough*Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator/checklist*cough* -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  • No. You've been here 3 days and made no edits and have generally irritated me on chat. ~ CJC 21:15, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Cligra.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 21:17, July 16, 2012 (UTC)

  • God dang edit conflicts! Twice! ALSO, per CJC. Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

Comments

Vorenus22 http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator look at the bottom I have been nominate. Plz support it Canvassing. -Cligra Join the redlink war!

I'll close it. I was going to oppose, but I got an edit conflict and wikia messed up the "this is your edit" thing. D: --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:19, July 16, 2012 (UTC)


Wertys761 (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,260 edits, 377 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I asked a while back in June, and was claimed to not be ready. I have gained popularity, maturity, cheerful attitude =D, and I'm active. I think I'm ready. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo

Support

1. He deserves and could totally use the rights. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. I really do appreciate it, Jeyo. :D Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
    No problem, Wert :) You deserve it.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 2. This user has so many reasons to be a mod :

  1. Mature user, definite support, and won't do anything wrong. --Czech 01:40, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

#i support because i like werty's blog posts -wikan (i hate my sig and don't know how to fix it)

  • Blogs don't have anything to do with chat mod rights...

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 03:36, July 15, 2012 (UTC) 3. I knew him on other websites way before he joined here and I've learned that he is very responsible and mature. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 03:09, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

  1. 4. Mature user, could definitely use the rights. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • He keeps PMing people to support him. Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

Incorrect. I PMed some people to either support or oppose me.
My EXACT words: Please either support or oppose. :D http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator
I don't see any problem with doing that. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
  • Wikan if you don't know how to use a custom sig then put the four tildes (~).

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Closing due to canvassing. --Berrybrick (Talk) 13:37, July 16, 2012 (UTC)

Korppufin

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Korppufin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,081 edits, 93 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I can make spammers leave sometimes and im going to promise ill make my behavior chance in chat. Korppufin 19:39, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. I don't know what he has done wrong he looks like a fine Mod to me. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring

Oppose

  1. He has no need for these rights and is not mature enough.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per CGCJ.

Admiral_Neo Talk_Page

  1. per Clone. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  2. ^^^ --Czech 22:20, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ^^^^ --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:45, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Don't know about him, but he said "I'll promise to make my behavior change in chat". Make it change first and show that it will stay changed, and then come back. Jag 04:11, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  5. He can sometimes be annoying. Dr Nefarious He is watching you... -Dr. Nefarious
  6. Per clone. Darth henry Talk Pain sig! - Burning eyes! 22:29, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Can be immature sometimes, and has no need for the rights. Sorry.Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Neutral

  1. I've never seen him on, so meh. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 22:49, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Mr. Minifigure, I don't see him on chat much, but he still seems reasonably mature. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz03:51, 6/25/2012 03:51, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

No. For the umpteenth time, nothing on that checklist is mandatory. --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:50, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Sorrybut I thought it used robe. Nvm then. But when it isn't checked off by the user, I will most likely say no. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!


Mat96

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Mat96 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (233 edits, 9 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

He is on a bunch and doesn't have any issues. He could use the tools well. Darth henry Talk Pain sig! - Burning eyes! 18:28, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. Darth henry Talk Pain sig! - Burning eyes! 18:28, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. He is ready and deserving of these rights. - Orez.
  3. when I come in the morning, guess who I see. Knight, him, and LUWiki. No mods. I think he would be great. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  4. Wouldn't destroy the world. --Czech 22:20, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Very mature and friendly. Dr Nefarious He is watching you... -Dr. Nefarious
  6. Very mature and kind user. :D --

EJ Talk Blog Contributions Customs 14:32, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Mat told me once he didn't want to be a Mod. If his thoughts have changed then I will definitely support.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • This is very weak oppose, but slightly greater than a neutral. Just some behaviour recently, such as when the person came on chat and said they were a girl, and has since been treated with "suspicion" since ([06:23] <Mat96> Sorry, but I will stay suspicious) ~ CJC 15:36, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC he was calling the user an it and when I told him that she was a girl he said he was suspicious. I talked to him about it in a PM. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Neutral

  1. He does seem Pretty cool, But i never see him Talk on the Main Chat Fire InfernalRaceLord talk, Lord of NothingFire Infernal
  2. Per above. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 19:09, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Sorry,but you can be pretty mad when trolls are on and you got kicked once. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  4. I think I've been on chat with him, but I don't remember him at all. Well, I do, but I'm probably confusing him with somebody else. :P --Berrybrick (Talk) 12:19, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  5. My only concern would be that he is very moody.

Admiral_Neo Talk_Page .

  1. Don't see him on chat very much. Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo
  2. Per wertys761.--Mr.Brick 16:19, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I've only seen him once on chat and that was a long time ago. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz03:49, 6/25/2012 03:49, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

You can call me Wertys or Wert, Mr. Brick! ;) Wertysnamelogo Robincustomaa Talk - Customs - My Site Riddlercustomaa Wertysnamelogo


SuperSpyX

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,701 edits, 1,987 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I think SSX has been good enough on chat to get his rights reinstated. I think he is a very mature user with over 2000 edits. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 21:45, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

Support

  1. As nominator. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 21:45, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  2. LLegofan100 (talk) 22:43, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Well, first of all, he's personally attacked me at least three times. And that's just me, Czech's comment makes it sound like there are more, and it doesn't surprise me.
  • Secondly, everytime somebody gets him in trouble, he tries to make it look like it's their fault and creates a forum which CJC or NXT close. Also, during his last chat mod request, almost every time somebody opposed, he would reply to even small things. I don't want a chat mod who has so much self pride that they can't admit when they've done wrong.
  • He seems to expect people to make exceptions for him when he breaks rules. Maybe once or twice, especially when it's something small (not that I'm saying I give him exceptions) but when he's been warned, he just does it again. People who would make good mods should not only follow all of the rules (I know that isn't always possible) but learn from their mistakes. I guess they have to realize that they make mistakes though.
  • He spams (for want of a better word, something tells me people will complain if I use "advertizes") his MOCs on chat. I know it's a small thing, but he doesn't give a reason. He does ask, but he doesn't say what for. He'll bring it up in conversation, then ask. Why do we need to see your MOCs? To me, it just seems like he's trying to switch the conversation over to himself. Honestly, he seems rather self-centered. I could go into more detail about this, but I won't.
  • "Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?" You wrote this, right Hades? The last two times I've entered chat when he is on, he has said something like "AUGGHHHHHH" or, er, well, the other time was kind of a personal attack, so I'd rather not say that. I don't see how screaming or whatever when a user he doesn't like comes on chat helps make it a better place, nor do I see how advertising/spamming/I need a better word showing-off his MOCs helps us.
  • Whenever he feels wronged, he not only acts like he wasn't at fault, but looses control and makes threats. I remember seeing this at least twice.
  • He overreacts. On a few occasions where he has spoken to me about himself, all I'll say is "whatever." He takes offense to that and can't seem to fathom why I'm not listening. Well, that's what he thinks. I am listening, I just don't care.
  • Now, let's go over a few chat rules:
  • "Stay on Topic: If there is an active discussion, don't interrupt with a completely unrelated topic, unless it's something that needs immediate attention." MOC pages links. He hasn't disrupted chat with them recently, at least not without asking, but I've only been on with him twice since he last did it.
  • "Nothing controversial: Steer clear of political or religious topics." I recall Ajr claiming he was making racist remarks about Canadians a month or so ago.
  • "Don't advertise: Your website, LEGO model, wiki, picture, video, etc. may be cool, but that doesn't mean everyone wants to hear about it." I don't need to rant about this again, and SSX, if/when your read this, if you feel the need to reply, skip this one. We've argued it to death.
  • And a wiki policy:
  • "Use common sense: If something seems like a stupid thing to do, don't do it. If you are worried that your actions will offend another user, they most likely will." I think that you can find examples through this where he hasn't used common sense, and that's just with my experience with him.
  • Though his edits are usually decent, editing has nothing to do with chat. Nominations, supports, opposes, etc. should not be based on the number or quality of edits. Unless, you know, it's vandalism, but I digress. :P
  • Like CzechMate, said, he is actually pretty immature. Not like lying to get friends and spelling everything ron immature, but the "I (he) can do no wrong" immature.
  • It'll be a lot easier to ban him from chat if he isn't a mod. :P
--Berrybrick (Talk) 21:59, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  1. One of the most immature users on chat. He got his rights taken away for personal attacks, thinking he was in charge. Immature users should not have chat mod. After reading Berrybrick's text wall, I'm full on oppose. I've even remembered him wanting me de-righted 3-4 times, when he, himslef, as been as immature. Sorry. --Czech 22:04, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  1. Well, er, per berry :P - zero
  2. per bb -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  3. Per BB. klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 00:13, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per all. Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring
  5. Per Czech and most of BB's comments. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz04:01, 6/25/2012 04:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Per BB --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 05:59, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per CP and BB. Sorry. Ninja Head StealthNinja Contact 6,767 Edits

Comments

  • BB a text wall? Is this about why he lost the rights... I can't remember why so be sure to include that. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 22:03, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  • Neither do I actually, but no, that isn't why. --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:04, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
Now I Know why. Your wall of text seems to have messed with the numbering. I think I will close this. If anyone supports by tomarrow, I will close this.
  • Since everyone thinks I'm some kind of horrid monster I'm not even gonna bother answering most of those questions, except these. "Showing off" my mocs: Did you read what KoN said in the forum about that matter? That is what I think. If I spend 10 hours building/rebuilding something to get it where I want it, and then you just dismiss it just like that, it makes me feel like I shouldn't of spent that time to build it. I'm proud of my mocs and I want people to see them, is there anything wrong with that? Plus it's not spam, I only post each link ONCE. When I said "AAUUGGHH" the first time, it was because of the mocpages uploader, which wasn't working, not because of you. I can admit that I am wrong, when I get into an arguement and have a chance to cool down, I usually apologize, this happened with AJR, after the racist bit he banned me, then the next morning I had cooled down and I apologized, and he apologized (for the thing that had made me mad) and unbanned me and now we're friends, even though we don't see each other much.

SuperSpyX Knowledge isPower

  • Yep, and we decided that as long as it was once and they gave a reason, we'd allow it. Create a page then, or PM people. Don't change the conversation just so that you can feel good about yourself. I know that you apologized, but you still said it. It's good that he has forgiven you, but it doesn't mean you won't do it again. You have PA'd people time and time again after receiving warnings, after all. --Berrybrick (Talk) 13:11, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Did you 2 HAVE to make it so long? :P Irnakk Ash nazg Talkpage One Ring To Bore Them All.The-one-ring


LMFS

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful, user requested archive

LMFS (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (213 edits, 39 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am mature, friendly, and respectful. It is okay if I am not a mod but it is worth a try.

Support

Oppose

  1. Inability to format this properly is really off-putting, ad user almost got banned today, not a good quality. Czech

Neutral

Comments


Wertys761

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,260 edits, 377 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I've been on Brickipedia for a while. I have plenty of experience on other sites as chat moderator, and am ready to take on the position for Bricki.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Only ever seen this user on once, don't see them having a need for these rights and I'm not too sure about there maturity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. per clone. Only seen you once. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!
  3. Only visits the site once every few months, I don't think he'd need the rights. -Konicle2 17:04, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Not ready for the responsibility. Darth henry Talk Pain sig! - Burning eyes! 17:13, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per KoN.

Admiral_Neo Talk_Page .

  1. Sorry to say, per KoN. --Czech 02:24, June 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I think you guys have only seen me once because I don't go on chat often with you guys.
  • um... I am on daily... For hours at a time... At tons of different times...mi look at chat logs... I have never seen you until today... If I may add, a mod needs to be on chat a lot. Knight add alot picture. -LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate! 16:57, June 15, 2012 (UTC) Sonofhades101


Alien Cyborg

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I think I am mature enough and I am a decent user on chat -- Alien Cyborg Talk!You cannot hide... Alienandroid 23:17, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • He may be my brother but I think he is mature enough and he does have an awesome brother :P --Czech 23:37, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • because your a good persion- axs678
  • Weak suuport-He is new but super mature. Darth henry Talk Pain sig! - Burning eyes! 15:45, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Power Jim Talk Blogz07:19, 4/9/2012

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

Oppose

  • Really? Your chat block was just lifted, if anybody takes a look at his talk page you can see that he is underage. OPPOSE--WCDDoherty 16:46, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Actually, his block from editing was lifted, due to a mistake. People thought he was CzechMate's sockpuppet, when really, he was his brother. Also, he is not underage- please don't just to conclusions. He, along with CzechMate, said he is 13 years old. Skdhjf(Talk!) 17:19, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You just got back from a long period of inactivity three days ago. Take it easy, sir. FB100Ztalkcontribs 18:59, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I say no, user is sometimes inappropriate and also per Tat and FB.

SuperSpyX Tell me your secrets You cannot hide 12:45, April 10, 2012 (UTC)

    • Such as? --

Alien Cyborg Talk!You cannot hide... Alienandroid 05:06, April 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Who are you? I've never seen you before, nor on chat. Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

    • They thought I was a sockpuppet so they blocked me but, I'm just CP's brother and nothing more. --

Alien Cyborg Talk!You cannot hide... Alienandroid 23:22, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

      • Odd. He's never mentioned anything about having a brother. Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

        • He has a few times. I'm not usually on the computer too much and me and Czech talk to each other enough at home :P --

Alien Cyborg Talk!You cannot hide... Alienandroid 23:24, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

          • Not to me...Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

            • Does he have to tell a specific person he has a brother? I actually remember when he was banned. βʊʛ™ Ʈҩƪҡ - Customs 23:27, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
              • No, I was just saying he never told me. Geez, sorr-y, Bug. Dj

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!


Grovyle4life

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

I am re-nominating myself as chat mod because I have just come back to the wiki and have realized that I lost it while I was gone. That is all. A'm actually still alive, everybody 12:15, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • No issues with trust here. ~ CJC 14:45, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great guy. Welcome back! klagoerRollinglaughingsmileyname that user 15:05, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • We know he's a great user. Absolutely no reason why not. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  • He was a good mod before, his return may have been recent, but he can handle chatmod. --Czech 21:57, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Definitely.

SuperSpyX Tell me your secrets You cannot hide 18:02, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • You have just come back. I'm not sure yet. --Czech 12:15, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
What do you think I should do to "reset the foundation" and get "back to the wiki"? A'm actually still alive, everybody 13:35, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Request for Closure


Sonofhades101

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Sonofhades is a trusted user on chat, He knows when to ban someone, he's often helped me out too, Nothing bad can happen from giving him these rights, he's mature enough AND it'd be a great learning experience for him too.

-LazerzSoH --- Destroy, Destroy, Exterminate!: I felt I had better add this. It's not politics, to get myself votes. It's true. I spent a day thinking about this. This entire, for want of a better word, speech. A while ago, an amazing user left the wiki. Forever or not, I don't know. He had a lot going on for him here, Tat. He was an mod and admin, I think. Lots of edits, lots of friends. It shocked me when he left. He was a person who contributed so much to the wiki. But that wasn't what amazed me. I felt the same way he did. Chat was bringing me down.Then I realized, I needed to think about leaving. And I did. I really almost left. I made a list of reasons on why I should leave and why I should stay. The list of reasons almost took me away from the wiki. I wondered if it had been partly my fault in his leaving. It was. I could have put up a better stand of my beliefs. My standards should show. For want of a better term, I shall use "Not very nice people". The battle between the "Not very nice people" will always continue. To be a mod, the user has to set a good example. If everyone did that, the "not very nice people" would not exist. Tat would have not had another reason to leave. Chat shouldn't be bringing me down. And it doesn't have to. If we are a positive force, chat will become a better place. Either way, win or lose, I need to help the wiki more. I need to be better in chat. I guess this finished my thoughts. Well, see you around guys. It's been a while but I guess I should add some stuff about myself: Um... I have around 600 edits, I am on chat every time I come on wiki, which is what I do every time I go on the computer, My favorite theme would have to be Ninjago, and I am awesome. I guess for more, you have to check my user page.

Support

SuperSpyX Tell me your secrets You cannot hide

  • Per Cligra. ~ CJC 11:19, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • per Cligra