FANDOM

 
34,800 Pages

(Oppose)
(Oppose)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
#Sorry, but you just joined and look how educated you are in the chat.
 
#Sorry, but you just joined and look how educated you are in the chat.
 
I find it a wee bit odd. <span style="background-color:blue; border:4px ridge blue;">[[File:TARDIS2.png|0x42px]] [[User:Galadhanu|<span style="color:white;">'''Galadhanu'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Galadhanu|<span style="color:white;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> <sup></sup> </span> 02:28, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
 
I find it a wee bit odd. <span style="background-color:blue; border:4px ridge blue;">[[File:TARDIS2.png|0x42px]] [[User:Galadhanu|<span style="color:white;">'''Galadhanu'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Galadhanu|<span style="color:white;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> <sup></sup> </span> 02:28, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  +
#:But is that a problem? If I'm knowledgeable about chat, isn't that a good thing? --[[User:The Evil Ogel|The Evil Ogel]] ([[User talk:The Evil Ogel|talk]]) 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
   
 
===Comments===
 
===Comments===

Revision as of 02:29, November 19, 2013

Requests: Chat Moderator - Administrator - Bureaucrat - Rollback and Patroller

Shortcut:
BP:RfCM

This is Brickipedia's requests for chat moderator page, on which any user may request chat moderator rights. Chat moderators have the ability to kick and ban users from chat who are being disruptive.

If you are considering nominating yourself for chat moderator, please read through the checklist to make sure that you meet the criteria.

To file a request, place the following code under the "current requests" header, above any existing requests.

An archive of past requests can be viewed here.

==replace this with your username==
{{Rfr/1|replace this with your username}}
replace this with a brief paragraph about why you want to be nominated. ~~~~
===Support===
#
===Neutral===
===Oppose===
#
===Comments===
*

Requests made on this page are a vote, meaning that if they achieve at least 80% support then they will be closed as successful. Opposers must provide reasons for opposing. Most requests last for around a week, unless there is clear consensus either way after a short period of time.

If a user has been nominated for chat moderator before, add 2 to the end of the topic header. For users with multiple requests, add the respective number of the request. It is also considered good practice to link to previous requests for rights when nominating a user.

Current requests

The Evil Ogel

The Evil Ogel (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (142 edits, 102 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am requesting chat moderator rights because I have become dedicated to the community and feel like it would be beneficial for the community for me to donate my time and efforts in making chat a better place, enforcing the chat policies, and engaging further with the community. I understand that I'm barely over the minimum requirements, but I've watched this wiki for several months, and I only joined when I realised that anonymous contributing had been turned off. I then realised that a live chat was available to registered users, which I immediately joined, and have been active in every day since I joined. Since I had been on this wiki as an anonymous user for several months, I have a good understanding of the members of the community and the policies this wiki has set. I also think that if I were to be a chat moderator, it would add a nice diversity to the team of moderators, as I have been told that I would be the only AFOL on the chat moderator team (this is of course not counting the administrator team, though I have had some great conversations with them). Anyways, I figured I'd put up this request for the reasons I just listed. I hope that the community accepts and approves of this request, as I feel like my time and efforts being volunteered would positively impact the community. Cheers! The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Mature, I see no reason not to. - BF2 Talk 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Super mature, great guy, good contributor, and will use these rights well. --Czech 02:26, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. You're a good person, as I've heard, but I haven't seen much of you, which means I don't know what to think of you. --Knight

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but you just joined and look how educated you are in the chat.

I find it a wee bit odd. TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 02:28, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

  1. But is that a problem? If I'm knowledgeable about chat, isn't that a good thing? --The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Dragonknight86

Dragonknight86 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (2,069 edits, 1,031 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Dragonknight is on chat nearly every day, and he's a mature chatter. I think him having these rights would benefit the community. When he's on chat, he's actually on chat, he's rarely ever away. He's been here for a few months now, and I think he could use these rights. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to neutral)

Neutral

  • Never seen the user on chat. -Legoboy 15:20, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • A fine user, but I have not seen enough of him recently to support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:35, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • I need to think about this one. I've only seen him on chat recently, and he suggested that he was getting high, so, probably leaning towards oppose. --Berrybrick (Talk) 21:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per BFN. --LFY1547 19:10, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • I haven't really seen this user, and I've been in chat every day since I joined... --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. The last time I saw you on chat, you tend to fought with users. You were also one of the people that celebrated for continuous days after I was banned... does not come off as a likeable person. --- CM4S (talk) 21:37, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. activity is an issue. And hasn't really helped handle situations ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:23, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per CM4Sci;TRD Galadhanu (talk) 15:30, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I can recall a lot of Amir Kinard-ish behavior in the past, and haven't seen enough of him in the present. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yeah, we don't need a chat mod who is going to be getting high and then going on chat. Also, he has been a bad influence on some users in the past (see Jeyo's opposition). --Berrybrick (Talk) 01:18, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  6. See above. ~ CJC 01:21, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • User accepted via PM on chat. --LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Galadhanu

Galadhanu (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (549 edits, 215 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

I am active on chat, and do try to help out chat as much as I can. I am responsible, and am currently on a break from my fanfiction. These rights would be useful, as lots of spammers and trolls come onto chat when there are no mods, and as I am there when nobody else is, it would be useful. Galadhanu (talk) 15:40, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Activity may be a bit of a problem, but other than that, I don't see why not. He hasn't caused problems in a while, I don't see any harm coming from this. --LFY1547 19:07, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per LFY. -

-Brix

  1. Galadhanu hasn't been bad at all lately and has been a good user. Blob bless you all! --Knight
  2. Per LFY Misslilytoon (talk) 00:34, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Haven't seen you on enough to decide. -Legoboy 17:22, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Legoboy ---- BellahScootsThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 18:31, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • Not quite ready to support. You've been doing very well recently, but there are a few things from a long time ago on the LMBW I saw that make me want to wait a while. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:26, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't really see how that would have an affect on how he acts here today. :s --LFY1547 20:38, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    It's because I want to make sure that the incidents in the past truly will never happen again. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:42, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    Ah, I see --LFY1547 20:43, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    #AssumeGoodFaith. :P (Kidding). Galadhanu (talk) 06:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • He has a history of trolling, but he's calmed down quite a bit, so if he gets CM, I won't mind at all. LCF (talk!) 01:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. To be honest, I really don't trust Galad. He has a history of trolling and spamming on this wiki, LMBW, Community Central and who knows how many more. While many of the issues I just brought up were not very recent, gut feeling still rules this vote: I suspect he's just put on a more social veneer. I also don't want a moderator who orders you to get out if you say you don't know of or don't like Doctor Who. -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I haven't spammed on any wiki. :P I think it's right to go with your gut feeling, but don't say anything untrue. Galadhanu (talk) 17:06, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Actually, I don't think Galad ever trolled LMBW that badly, they just thought it was bad. :P --LFY1547 17:08, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I haven't really trolled LMBW. Or Community Central. It wasn't really trolling. I only trolled this wiki when I came here the first time, the second time, I apologized. And look at LFY! He wasn't always the best. He's a moderator now, isn't he? I honestly could just spam now, without moderator rights, but I won't because I don't do that. Galadhanu (talk) 17:23, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    LFY seems to think you were trolling on LMBW (even if it wasn't that bad) and I was there while you were trolling Community Central. And I don't think you only did it once here. Then, yes, you apologized...and later posted a "falling" blog dissing everyone on Bricki and ordering us all to stop spamming blogs and being ridiculous on chat.</irony> -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    LFY was with LMBW when I "trolled" them. Community Central technically wasn't trolling, and I only trolled once here. I was trying to get people back to their senses with the irrelevant blog. With those people saying "ermergerd der werker ers ferllerng", it was in no way irony. Galadhanu (talk)
    He may have been trolling, yeah. However, his trolling was very minor and I'm sure most LMBW users don't even remember it. --LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
I don't order them to get out. I used to jokingly do so, which should've been obvious.

I give them a link to every episode if they wish to see it. :P TARDIS2 Galadhanu Talk 06:00, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Jeyo. --Czech 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


Edward Nigma (2)

Edward Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,620 edits, 1,273 mainspace) - (Back to user rights requests)

Edward is a mature and active chatter, far more active than he was when his first nomination took place. He's often on in times when most/all mods are away, and he would do well with these rights. He knows the policies well, and he's definitely not the kind of person who is going to abuse these rights. (Old RfCM) --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I thought he already had chat mod. Per LFY's nomination reason. :S -- Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. He's been great in chat every day that I've been there. He knows the place well, and understands the chat policies like a moderator should. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Ogel Galadhanu (talk) 17:59, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Jeyo --Berrybrick (Talk) 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Sounds good Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:38, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • I don't recall seeing him on chat lately. -Legoboy 13:43, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    He's usually on a while after you leave. :P --LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted via PM. --LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.