34,657 Pages

This page is for any requests to become a member of the Review Quality Moderators.

To prevent excessive nominations, there is an edit and time requirement for the user to be eligible to make a request. The user must have made at least 100 mainspace edits, and have been on the wiki for at least 1 month. If the request is unsuccessful, the user will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date the request concluded. For a request to pass, there must be at least a +3 vote count and a 60 percent positive vote percentage.

A requester may withdraw their request at any time throughout the process, but will be unable to lodge a request until two months after the date of withdrawal if the overall vote score is less than zero.

How to make a request

To make a request, use the following syntax:

=={{u|(your username)}}, Requested ~~~~~==
'''Request comments:''' (any comments here)

After one week, an admin who is also a RQM member will close the request and notify you of the result. An archive of past requests can be seen here.

Please note, only members of the Review Quality Moderators are permitted to vote.

LSCStealthNinja, Requested 16:27, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

Request comments: I've made 8 reviews, all are long and detailed. I think I should be a Review Quality Moderator because I'm one of the few people who are still active in the Review namespace. I would like to moderate user's reviews and decided if they are Acceptable or not. I'm already a Custom Quality Moderator, so I am used to this and know how it should be done.


  1. Sure why not. But you really should review more often. :) --ToaMeiko (talk) 16:28, August 26, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Your reviews look good. Jag 21:27, September 20, 2013 (UTC)



Jeyo, Requested 03:25, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Request comments: While it's true that I've as of yet made only one review, I've read several more and I'm sure I have grasped what makes one acceptable and/or unacceptable. I'm also a member of the CQM and QCG, so I'm not exactly new to properly formatting articles. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:25, December 26, 2012 (UTC)


  1. I'd like to see some more reviews for an absolute 100% support, but I'm sure you know what you're doing and can easily handle these rights :) NightblazeSaber 04:37, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Jag 03:37, August 26, 2013 (UTC)



  • Neutral. Per NBS, except I don't feel like it is a reason to support. --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:16, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per BB. --Czech 02:41, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Klagoer, Requested 22:24, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Beening one of the more active users in Reviews and having a featured review. I also have read most reviews and I think I have determined a fair review from a bad one. I am also a member of the QCG so I think that also adds more expierence.


  1. Definitely :) NightblazeSaber 22:26, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
    # <s>Jeyo</s> Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:03, December 30, 2012 (UTC) (Must be a member of the RQM to vote)
  2. Jag 03:37, August 26, 2013 (UTC)



  • Neutral. --Berrybrick (Talk) 02:15, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
  • User hasn't been super active, so neutral. --Czech 02:42, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.