Forums - Blog comments specifing admins and chat mods
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page.

Comment: Unsuccessful consensus.

Hey everyone, I have been going through blogs and stuff, and I thought of another wiki I work at, and I thought the blog comments should be specified showing admins, bureaucrats, and chat mods. So, here it is on the ANT Farm Wiki, and there is more info there:

Link to blog

I can make it, I know how, so... Thanks, and leave your decisions below the line :).

Evanf (Talk)


  1. As maker of forum. Evanf (Talk)
  2. As I said in the blog, sounds good to me. I see a lot of new users making blogs, having admins highlighted on the comments would encourage them and let them know who's who faster, I think... after all, blogs are the second most popular form of community chat here IMO -Konicle2.png 21:07, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  3. After thinking about it, I think it's a good idea. Support. -NBP 22:25, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Chat Mods (I see no reason why someone would want to know who the chat mods are, no offence). Support one colour that applies to both admins and B'crats.

SKP4472 Talk [[Special:Editcount/SKP4472|Special:Editcount/SKP4472 Edits!]] Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 06:35, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

  1. This. ^ -NBP 12:17, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
    Whoops, forgot chat mods. I agree, SKP. -Konicle2.png 13:22, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
  2. MEGA Support We've needed this for a long time.

DM1 14:36, May 3, 2012 (UTC)

  1. SUPPORT: I want it so I know who are admins because there are way too many. Antfarmer
    Not true, we don't have nearly enough admins right now. ajr 14:24, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
    You think so? - nxt
    11 active admins is enough, right? Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    I don't think this is really a very good place to be discussing this... :P What he means, though, is that there are quite a few admins, and it can be difficult to learn them all. Drewlzoo
    More admins mean more help, if you don't want help, then why are you supporting this? Even if we did have too many, how is that a bad thing? Vandalism easily reverted, RC watched constantly, nothing wrong with a large group of administratorsa (Which we don't even have right now anyways). -NBP 15:54, May 9, 2012 (UTC)


  • I'm not sure it's the best idea, might make people think others are more important. --Czech 22:15, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • I oppose for chat mods, but I'm neutral for admins and bureaucrats. --Berrybrick (Talk) 22:38, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Berrybrick. klagoerRollinglaughingsmiley.gifname that user 22:39, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Berrybrick. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
  • Per Berrybrick (chatmods have nothing to do with user blogs) NightblazeSaber 22:53, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Czechmate. -

Power Jim Talk Blogz06:40, 5/4/2012 06:40, May 4, 2012 (UTC)


  • I don't see how this would be beneficial... at all. A well worded comment should be what people are looking for, regardless of who says it. ajr 22:29, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Ajr. We don't need everything to look superb. Dj.jpg

CM4S Talk Brick of Dawn!

  • I don't see why it would make a difference. (Though I suppose you could tell if it was a rollback or chat mod insulting someone in the blog comment...) ~ CJC 17:43, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • oppose, everybody's opion should be equal --User:Brick bobby User talk: Brick bobby 06:15, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't actually see why this is needed, highhlighting users = pointless. --Czech 09:46, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
    • You have two votes on this forum :P Drewlzoo