(re) |
Agent Charge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:: Yeah, that's what reminded me to start the forum :) And I've been thinking "I should archive FAN and GAN today" for the last five days, but it's so boring {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
:: Yeah, that's what reminded me to start the forum :) And I've been thinking "I should archive FAN and GAN today" for the last five days, but it's so boring {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::And I was thinking that I should do it, but I didn't know what ''to'' do... {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 02:31, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
:::And I was thinking that I should do it, but I didn't know what ''to'' do... {{User:Captain_Jag/sig1}} 02:31, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | :I haven't ever archived anything, so I don't know the process, but '''support''' anyway. [[User:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Agent'''</font>]] [[User talk:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Charge'''</font>]] 02:32, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
+ | :I haven't ever archived anything, so I don't know the process, but '''support''' anyway. [[User:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Agent'''</font>]] [[User talk:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Charge'''</font>]] [http://buildchallenge.org/Teams/Profile.aspx?TeamID=285 <font color="Darkblue">'''Please vote'''</font>] 02:32, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
:Bah. Yes please. Takes soooo long to archive those dumb things, though this still doesn't solve lack of discussion :s {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 03:04, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
:Bah. Yes please. Takes soooo long to archive those dumb things, though this still doesn't solve lack of discussion :s {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 03:04, September 6, 2012 (UTC) |
||
---- |
---- |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
** Seen an oppose to changing over c2/3/4 forums, so are we keeping them as is, or changing them over? {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 08:09, September 17, 2012 (UTC) |
** Seen an oppose to changing over c2/3/4 forums, so are we keeping them as is, or changing them over? {{User:NightblazeSaber/sig}} 08:09, September 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
***Keep 3/4 the way they are. 2 should be in forum mode though. Also, I don't think that archives for 3/4 are needed. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 12:38, September 17, 2012 (UTC) |
***Keep 3/4 the way they are. 2 should be in forum mode though. Also, I don't think that archives for 3/4 are needed. {{User:Ajraddatz/sig}} 12:38, September 17, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | *** Personally think we should do this for all classes, but agree with Ajr about no 3/4 archives. {{User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature}} |
||
+ | **** Per NXT [[User:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Agent'''</font>]] [[User talk:Agent Charge|<font color="black">'''Charge'''</font>]] [http://buildchallenge.org/Teams/Profile.aspx?TeamID=285 <font color="Darkblue">'''Please vote'''</font>] 06:12, September 18, 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:16, 18 September 2012
So, what I'm propsing- we make all nom pages (FAN, GAN, C2N, C4N, C4N) look like Forum:Index, with all the noms listed, and one page for each nom. Then, when a nom is closed, instead of doing a 10-step archiving process, we could simply stick an "A" at the end of a forum header, and it would be archived. This would mean however that each forum would have a separate page, so you won't be able to edit them all together. Since Jag's got Semantic Mediawiki enabled in all namespaces now, I can incorporate into the forum header properties for the date that the forum was made, and also for number of supporting and opposing votes. Then, in the main nom pages (that look like Forum:Index), it can display the vote count and time the forum should be closed under each entry, to give people a summary of how the nom's currently going without actually looking at the nom page. So, that's the end of the text wall, feel free to support/oppose/discuss/whatever. NightblazeSaber 01:50, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
|