Forum:Fully protected pages

Forums: Index →

→ Fully protected pages

Well, I was trolling around the wiki and noticed a few fully protected userpages, amongst other things. I think that it would be a good idea to not have fully protected userpages.

Sometimes, template change (etc), and links need to be fixed. It is nice if all users can do this, rather than just admins.
If a user is going around vandalizing userpages they will be blocked anyways, and we already have a common sense policy of not editing each-others' userpages, which we could set in stone.

Anyways, please discuss. a jr 22:19, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that.:P I was testing a few things; I meant to change the level of protection down once the tests were over. Sorry again.Skdhjf^(Talk!) 22:30, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Psh, don't be sorry. You're the newbie after all :P a jr 22:37, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
:D lol. Skdhjf^(Talk!) 22:39, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Agree to remove the protection from fully protected userpages, but protecting them autoconfirmed should still be used to prevent attacks from IPs. Samdo994 talk contribs 10:46, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Yea, autoconfirm isn't a problem. That still allows users to perform any maintenance tasks that need doing. a jr 03:03, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
Semi-protect at most seems good to me (unless a temporary full-protection due to excessive vandalism comes up) NightblazeSaber 10:40, May 2, 2011 (UTC)