This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page.
Comment: keep infobox how it is
Some changes to the infobox have been worked on by Mythrun, you can see his work here.
The changes consist of:
A "hide" tab in the corner of the infobox, allowing the user to hide/show the infobox.
Moving the Table of Contents into the infobox instead of having them at the default position near the top of the article.
So, do we want these changes in the infobox or not? NightblazeSaber 07:19, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
Personally I like the TOC where it currently is, and I don't have a clue as to why anyone would want to hide an infobox, but I feel bad opposing something I know Mythun's put a lot of work into :S NightblazeSaber 07:19, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
I preferred the info box as it was, the content thing was fine on the side where it was it doesn't need to be moved in to the info box as the infobox is meant to be about the minfigure, set or whatever the article is about not about the article. Also i find the hide thing pointless as i don't understand why anyone would like to hide the infobox.Clone gunner commander jeditalk
It is cool, but why we would need to hide the infobox I'm not sure. ~ CJC 08:36, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
Per CGCJ and CJC, everything's fine how it is. - 08:40, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
I dunno' about the hide and show thing, but moving the TOC into the infobox is brilliant, IMO. I'm gonna' Support it. :) Drewlzoo
I don't mind the ToC in the infobox, but it is a good idea. I don't see what's wrong with the hide tab though, sure I don't want to hide it but it's a nice little option for people with the fear of rectangles. --Berrybrick(Talk) 13:48, May 15, 2012 (UTC)