| Forums: Index → |
|
→ New Logo? |
I made a new logo for the site. Use it or don't, I don't care either way, I just thought the current logo looked a little messy IMO. NEW LOGO
- Solid work, I must admit. I don't know if the others will like it as much, but I think it looks good. :) It may have been used before though, judging by its simplicity. -NBP 15:58, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
- I prefer the logos with a LEGO image in them; they're more interesting. - nxt 06:18, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The problem with Brickipedia's "branding" is that it doesn't have a fixed identifiable icon or character that really represents the community. (Q.E.D.) Even Google has a unique and well-known wordmark for their logo, but we're stuck with imitating LEGO's font and color choices. My suggestion: why don't we introduce a mascot? A minifigure depicting the typical Brickipedian, perhaps? FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:26, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm on it...bwahahahaha -NBP 22:30, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Oooh, me like. -Cligra Join the redlink war!
- Who's got a really nice expensive camera (or photo retouching software), a bunch of minifig parts, an artistic intuition, and a bit of spare time? :D FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:33, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm on it...bwahahahaha -NBP 22:30, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The problem with Brickipedia's "branding" is that it doesn't have a fixed identifiable icon or character that really represents the community. (Q.E.D.) Even Google has a unique and well-known wordmark for their logo, but we're stuck with imitating LEGO's font and color choices. My suggestion: why don't we introduce a mascot? A minifigure depicting the typical Brickipedian, perhaps? FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:26, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
How about this? He's a bit plain, however. I plan to add a brick icon to his uniform. FB100Z • talk • contribs 23:11, May 21, 2011 (UTC)