Forum:New name for the Check group

Forums: Index →

Old forum

→ New name for the Check group

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was To choose a name for the CCG (6/3 [5/2 CCG members]) Hi, does anyone else have any thoughts about having a new name for the BP:CCG? Lcawte apparently doesn't, but what do other people think? One of my ideas is the Imperial Cadets. It shows that we are working toward the same thing as the Imperial Guards, but we are not as experienced as them. Anyone? Jag 19:11, June 4, 2010 (UTC) Again do I have to state that it does not need a new name? Imperial Guards makes it a special user group.. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 19:46, June 4, 2010 (UTC) I guess the name is okay for now. Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]] 12:49, June 5, 2010 (UTC) Personally I'm ok with the CCG having a name- every other wiki I've seen gives a special name to every review group they have, and I can't see why we shouldn't. But I don't think it should be Imperial Cadets (I can see where it comes from though and it does sound good :D). BOR and CCG are separate entities- actually there are only two out of five BOR members who are CCG members as well (LegOtaku and myself) NightblazeSaber 11:30, June 19, 2010 (UTC) I like CCG it sounds good. However, if there was a different name I think it should be article status rejectors (that would be an april fools day joke). Nah, stay the same. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 23:32, June 24, 2010 (UTC) So, so far we have to supports: (Me and NHL), two oppose: (Lcawte and BobaFett2), and I'm not sure what Samdo is, neutral or oppose. Jag 19:38, June 25, 2010 (UTC) I'd support Clone Cadet Troop if it were an option :D GG 360 20:53, June 25, 2010 (UTC) Voting Give the completeness check group a new name --Jag 19:38, June 25, 2010 (UTC) NightblazeSaber 00:31, June 26, 2010 (UTC) BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 00:42, June 26, 2010 (UTC) Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 00:55, June 26, 2010 (UTC) GG 360 16:31, June 30, 2010 (UTC) -Mariofighter3: Brickfliming now in session! 02:40, July 29, 2010 (UTC) Leave the name as the CCG # BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 21:44, June 25, 2010 (UTC) --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 06:26, June 26, 2010 (UTC) --I dont feel a need Kingcjc 20:37, July 1, 2010 (UTC) What's wrong with CCG? ajr 21:55, July 1, 2010 (UTC) Comments Just so everyone knows, CCG won't really be completely replaced, it'd just be an extra name, the FA review group's pretty commonly referred to as BOR instead of IG, so I'm guessing it'd probably be the same in this case NightblazeSaber 00:31, June 26, 2010 (UTC) Oh, then... I guess I changed my mind! I like the short-hand for it but a nickname would be great. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 00:42, June 26, 2010 (UTC) Neutral: I guess CCG is okay, but having a nickname could be nice too.  Samdo994 talk contribs  16:25, June 30, 2010 (UTC) When should this be closed? It's been open for a week now. Jag 20:25, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Voting

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was use the name "Agents" Alpha Team (+1) Support BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 17:52, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Comments Agents (+5) Support "CCG Agent" just sounds good to me, and Agents seems to suit the CCG well- they can either do things alone (grant complete status to any article they might come across) or as a team (CAP, removal of status votes) NightblazeSaber 01:25, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Jag 02:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 05:39, August 9, 2010 (UTC) -Mariofighter3: Brickfliming now in session! 00:13, August 10, 2010 (UTC) I still prefer zombie lords or little green men but this is good too. BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 12:52, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Comments Clone Cadet Troop (+3) Support Jag 02:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 05:39, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Yeah! GG 360 12:49, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Comments Clone Patrollers (+3) Support Jag 02:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC)  Samdo994 talk contribs  12:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Agent Fuse Talk [[Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse|Special:Editcount/Agent Fuse Edits!]] Grammatic Fanatic 05:39, August 9, 2010 (UTC) Comments Is this meant to be from Star Wars? NightblazeSaber 01:25, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Yes, it is. Jag 02:16, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Crown Knights (±0) Support Comments Crusaders (+2) Support  Samdo994 talk contribs  12:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC) ajr 13:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Comments Dragon Knights (±0) Support Comments Drones (+2) Support  Samdo994 talk contribs  12:43, August 8, 2010 (UTC) ajr 13:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC) Comments Fixer Uppers (±0) Support Comments Good Wizards (±0) Support Comments Henchmen (±0) Support Comments Jedi Masters (±0) Support Comments Jedi Council Members (±0) Support Comments Little Green Men (±0) Support # BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 17:53, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Comments Royal Knights (±0) Support Comments Turaga (±0) Support Comments Zombie Lords (+1) Support BobaFett Talk MOCPages Group (Click) 17:52, August 8, 2010 (UTC) Comments