Forums: Index → |
|
→ Part Infobox |
- Due to the growing number of part articles on this wiki, it has been suggested separately by Samdo994 and LegOtaku (and I also considered this myself before) that we should have a Parts Infobox. I've created a test infobox for this "here" with an example "here" (now redlinked pages) to demonstrate what it would look like, but I think we need to decide if we should have one, and if so, what fields the infobox should have, and if the parts infobox should have its own specific color, or just have the default infobox color. NightblazeSaber 00:03, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
Unresolved issues[]
I've now created Template:Part, but before it starts to be widely implemented, I just wanted to see what people thought about a couple of things.
- Pick a Brick Price: Should it be US$ only, or the four currencies we currently use for set infoboxes?
- Subtitle field: This was here since LegOtaku's creation of the original parts template design (it goes below the part name). Do we need it if LEGO doesn't have (to our knowledge) official names for parts?
- Colorboxes: We've chosen to use these, but I'm worried about whether they will be used in the template. When someone sees a "color" field who doesn't read the documentation (when it's included in the documentation :D), they'll only think to write the color in with text instead of a template. Also accidentally clicking the colorbox and taking the user to File:Transparent.png could be an issue.
- List of element ID's: This vote was never really resolved.
But, apart from this, it should be ok to use as far as I can see :) NightblazeSaber 05:00, February 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Anyone have any comments? NightblazeSaber 03:50, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Pick-a-Brick price: I think it only should be in $, since we might not have enough space for all prices.
- Subtitle field: We can mention this in the article itself, if available.
- Colorboxes: Its okay as in the example of Template:Part, but clicking on the box should link to Color Palette and not to the actual image, in my opinion.
- List of Element ID's: Should be either included in the template or in the article, I think into the article would be better. Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]] 12:44, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
I guess it might be possible to have both the tooltip with the colorname and the link to the color palette, but only with some javascript wizardry. Without it, it's either tooltip or link. So if someone knows how to do this I would be more than thankful. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 13:48, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
- As much as I like this collapsible appearance list feature (I came up with it in the first place), I think it might be better to have the list in the actual article instead. It's the same as with the minifigure infobox, a list in the article itself could be more detailed, i.e. include element ids etc. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 05:08, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
My vote for the subtitle field would be for it to be removed since there doesn't appear to be official names for the parts, and for the list of Element ID's, I guess it could go in the infobox to the right of appearances and have two collapsible fields side by side, but I don't know. Although, I think having an appearances section in this infobox is more feasible than the one in the minifigure infobox as it's collapsible (and wouldn't look weird if it is collapsible- I can't see a collapsible section in the current minifigure infobox looking any good). I also wouldn't mind just putting the appearances and ID's in a list at the bottom of the page, but it may make the pages very long. The colorbox template's been frustrating me for a while, and it's espcially annoying that it works fine in simple situations (see the example titled "internal link"). Also, is the template meant to go at the top or bottom of the page? And @Samdo- there's actually a lot of space to put the prices in for the four currencies we use with sets (example). But I'm neutral on this one. NightblazeSaber 07:02, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, [[File:example.jpg|link=Main Page|caption]] only works on Wikipedia etc. but not here on Wikia. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 07:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Well that's convenient :D I'll keep looking around I guess, but it's not looking good :S NightblazeSaber 07:30, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- The subtitle field could be used for a commonly used name that most people would recognize (See Part 4514700) but maybe we shouldn't have non-official names or data in the infobox. Just an idea. Jag 18:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
- If there or no actual official names, we should omit this completely. Also, what about a "type" field that sorts pieces to either System element, Duplo element, Technic element, Minifigure accessory etc.? --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 08:16, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Well that's convenient :D I'll keep looking around I guess, but it's not looking good :S NightblazeSaber 07:30, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Voting[]
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was to use colorboxes
How should the available colors be displayed in the template?See here for examples. As text
As color boxes
|
One of the above + a list of Element IDs (rather large, needs collapsible table)[]
- Support
- Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]]16:11, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose
- Comment
- I am definetly for a collapsible table, but I am not very sure, where "one above +" is. Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]]16:11, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, I guess it should be somewhere, but I'm not sure how it would be designed to fit so much content in NightblazeSaber 03:46, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, now I understand it. And what now, any other votes regarding this Template? Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]] 11:14, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Hopefully we're done- if there's no other comments in the next day I'll put it through. Also, Since LEGO have listed part colors now, we can have exact colors with the colorboxes and use their official names now, just thought I should point this out :) NightblazeSaber 23:43, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, now I understand it. And what now, any other votes regarding this Template? Samdo994 talk Contribs [[Special:Editcount/Samdo994|Special:Editcount/Samdo994 edits]] 11:14, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, sorry for being so stupid with this, but just for one more time- Design ID=Peeron number=many colors, and Element ID=number in instructions=one color, right? If so, I support the above thing. NightblazeSaber 03:50, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was 2, 4, 5, 6, 7
Which information should be displayed on the template?Name and Element ID are mandatory.
VoteList the numbers of the suggestions you are supporting or opposing in the respective section, followed by your sig (~~~~) and - optionally - a comment.
Comments
|
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was to create a parts infobox
Create a parts infoboxSupport
OpposeComments |
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was to create a parts infobox
Option #1: +4 votes, Option #2: -1 vote, Option #3: +1 vote Type of parts infobox
Option #1
Support
OpposeComments
Option #2
SupportOppose
CommentsOption #3
Support
OpposeComments
|