Forum:Redudancy

Forums: Index →

Administration

→ Redudancy

Just a quick, open note to say how I find the following redundant. The removal of minifigures from the opening line of a set article, due to the reason "It is already in the minifigure gallery or infobox", then adding prices to the opening line. If we are removing one thing due to duplicating information, why add some or keep some other duplicated information? - cjc 10:30, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Who said we should be putting the price in the lead section? The lead's meant to be a general introduction to the set, ie listing the features of the set (possibly including minifigures if the editors see fit since they can be considered to be a major part of the set). NightblazeSaber 11:44, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Seen it in a few edit summaries and stuff. I already moaned about it but was probably ignored, so I've created it again here. - cjc 12:59, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • If you want to know, BobaFett2 told me that we do not need to list the minifigures, I do not know why he even said that.

LEGO Lord Talk [[Special:Editcount/Lego lord|Special:Editcount/Lego lord Edits!]] ---- LEGO LOTR is coming!

• • • • This goes in the department of redundancy department. :P ShermanTheMythran