| Forums: Index → |
|
→ Year Previous |
This is certainly an odd title. There's a reason for that.
On many articles, we've written that it was released in the previous year. But it really should be counted as a set for the official year, right? So what do we do? I think that could go in the notes section. However-I don't think Toys R Us' date is really relevant, since that's something about the Toy Store. BobaFett
TalkMOCPages Group (Click) 18:24, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
- You mean the problem we talked about in the Forum:2011 sets in 2010? Oppose using "released in December 2010", support using "released in early 2011" and adding the pre-release of the set in late 2010 in the Notes section. Samdo994 talk contribs 18:31, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
Sorta. I don't see a need for TRU's (usually the earliest in the US) release date, as it pertains to a retailer's decision, but if such is the verdict... BobaFett
Talk
- We should at least mention that in the notes section so users who are not informed about this don't change the release dates in the infoboxes. Samdo994 talk contribs 18:39, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
BobaFett
Talk