mNo edit summary |
(→Someone really should fix this! It's urgent!: new section) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Fetured Artical == |
== Fetured Artical == |
||
* This should not be a fetured artical, it does not have anything to do with the fetured articals! --{{User:Coupon11/sig}} 21:50, April 24, 2010 (UTC) |
* This should not be a fetured artical, it does not have anything to do with the fetured articals! --{{User:Coupon11/sig}} 21:50, April 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Someone really should fix this! It's urgent! == |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Someone really messed up this page == |
||
+ | |||
+ | And I don't mean messed up as in the quality has decreased. I mean messed up as in someone edited some really irrelevant photos and changed the tables' formatting so that they are just incomplete code. Not only that, but I can't seem to fix it. Can someone help? Please?! |
||
+ | |||
+ | --[[Special:Contributions/50.99.255.27|50.99.255.27]] 04:23, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:23, 11 February 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 article.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
|
Why bother creating an article for this yet if there isn't any information for this. It is just a placeholder article and redlinks aren't evil. MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs/Logs} 21:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Source on republic SD? Kingcjc 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's fake- 8020 is a technic set from 1984- http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8020-1 NightblazeSaber 07:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
New Images/Sets
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=347719 - contains Spongebob, Creator, Pirates, Power Miners, Racers, Starwars, Technic and city
Also where Tyleraf got images from i think
Kingcjc 19:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Point on release cloumn
Is their a point on the release coloumn? Kingcjc 18:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
QUESTION
What do the crosses next to sets mean?Pizzahut101 21:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you scroll to the bottom it says that the set was released in some places late 2008 :) NightblazeSaber 21:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Release Date
On the release parts, is it necessary to put "Jan 09"? Kingcjc 19:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think the 09 part is needed since it's on the 2009 page- January should be fine NightblazeSaber 00:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Another Query
Shouldn't product collections go with the themes? Kingcjc 18:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Fetured Artical
- This should not be a fetured artical, it does not have anything to do with the fetured articals! --Coupon11 21:50, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Someone really should fix this! It's urgent!
Someone really messed up this page
And I don't mean messed up as in the quality has decreased. I mean messed up as in someone edited some really irrelevant photos and changed the tables' formatting so that they are just incomplete code. Not only that, but I can't seem to fix it. Can someone help? Please?!
--50.99.255.27 04:23, February 11, 2012 (UTC)