No edit summary |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Talkheader}} |
||
Why bother creating an article for this yet if there isn't any information for this. It is just a placeholder article and redlinks aren't evil. [[User:MarioGalaxy2433g5|<span style="color:silver">MarioGalaxy2433g5</span>]] {[[User talk:MarioGalaxy2433g5|<span style="color:aqua">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarioGalaxy2433g5|contribs]]/[[Special:Log/MarioGalaxy2433g5|Logs]]} 21:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
Why bother creating an article for this yet if there isn't any information for this. It is just a placeholder article and redlinks aren't evil. [[User:MarioGalaxy2433g5|<span style="color:silver">MarioGalaxy2433g5</span>]] {[[User talk:MarioGalaxy2433g5|<span style="color:aqua">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/MarioGalaxy2433g5|contribs]]/[[Special:Log/MarioGalaxy2433g5|Logs]]} 21:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
Source on republic SD? [[User:Kingcjc|Kingcjc]] 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
Source on republic SD? [[User:Kingcjc|Kingcjc]] 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
* It's fake- 8020 is a technic set from 1984- http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8020-1 {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
* It's fake- 8020 is a technic set from 1984- http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8020-1 {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 07:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==New Images/Sets== |
||
+ | http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=347719 - contains Spongebob, Creator, Pirates, Power Miners, Racers, Starwars, Technic and city |
||
+ | |||
+ | Also where Tyleraf got images from i think |
||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:Kingcjc|Kingcjc]] 19:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Point on release cloumn== |
||
+ | Is their a point on the release coloumn? [[User:Kingcjc|Kingcjc]] 18:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == QUESTION == |
||
+ | What do the crosses next to sets mean?[[User:Pizzahut101|Pizzahut101]] 21:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | * If you scroll to the bottom it says that the set was released in some places late 2008 :) {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 21:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Release Date == |
||
+ | |||
+ | On the release parts, is it necessary to put "Jan 09"? [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 19:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | * I don't think the 09 part is needed since it's on the 2009 page- January should be fine {{User:Nighthawk leader/sig}} 00:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Another Query == |
||
+ | |||
+ | Shouldn't product collections go with the themes? [[User:Kingcjc|King]][[User_Talk:Kingcjc|cjc]] 18:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | == Fetured Artical == |
||
+ | * This should not be a fetured artical, it does not have anything to do with the fetured articals! --{{User:Coupon11/sig}} 21:50, April 24, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Someone really should fix this! It's urgent! == |
||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Someone really messed up this page == |
||
+ | |||
+ | And I don't mean messed up as in the quality has decreased. I mean messed up as in someone edited some really irrelevant photos and changed the tables' formatting so that they are just incomplete code. Not only that, but I can't seem to fix it. Can someone help? Please?! |
||
+ | |||
+ | --[[Special:Contributions/50.99.255.27|50.99.255.27]] 04:23, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | * Fixed. - [[User talk:CJC95|CJC]] 10:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | **Wow, how did you do it?! Whenever I tried to compare past edits with current ones to see which one to undo, it would never load. Also, the preview wouldn't load either when I tried to fix it manually! Anyway, I think I speak for the whole wiki when I say thanks!--[[Special:Contributions/50.99.241.181|50.99.241.181]] 16:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ***A template was missing a }}. - [[User talk:CJC95|CJC]] 16:36, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | ****I knew that, but I couldn't figure out where for the above reasons!--[[Special:Contributions/50.99.241.181|50.99.241.181]] 16:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:50, 11 February 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 article.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
|
Why bother creating an article for this yet if there isn't any information for this. It is just a placeholder article and redlinks aren't evil. MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs/Logs} 21:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Source on republic SD? Kingcjc 18:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's fake- 8020 is a technic set from 1984- http://www.brickset.com/detail.aspx?Set=8020-1 NightblazeSaber 07:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
New Images/Sets
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=347719 - contains Spongebob, Creator, Pirates, Power Miners, Racers, Starwars, Technic and city
Also where Tyleraf got images from i think
Kingcjc 19:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Point on release cloumn
Is their a point on the release coloumn? Kingcjc 18:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
QUESTION
What do the crosses next to sets mean?Pizzahut101 21:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you scroll to the bottom it says that the set was released in some places late 2008 :) NightblazeSaber 21:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Release Date
On the release parts, is it necessary to put "Jan 09"? Kingcjc 19:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think the 09 part is needed since it's on the 2009 page- January should be fine NightblazeSaber 00:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Another Query
Shouldn't product collections go with the themes? Kingcjc 18:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Fetured Artical
- This should not be a fetured artical, it does not have anything to do with the fetured articals! --Coupon11 21:50, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
Someone really should fix this! It's urgent!
Someone really messed up this page
And I don't mean messed up as in the quality has decreased. I mean messed up as in someone edited some really irrelevant photos and changed the tables' formatting so that they are just incomplete code. Not only that, but I can't seem to fix it. Can someone help? Please?!
--50.99.255.27 04:23, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. - CJC 10:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, how did you do it?! Whenever I tried to compare past edits with current ones to see which one to undo, it would never load. Also, the preview wouldn't load either when I tried to fix it manually! Anyway, I think I speak for the whole wiki when I say thanks!--50.99.241.181 16:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- A template was missing a }}. - CJC 16:36, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- I knew that, but I couldn't figure out where for the above reasons!--50.99.241.181 16:50, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- A template was missing a }}. - CJC 16:36, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, how did you do it?! Whenever I tried to compare past edits with current ones to see which one to undo, it would never load. Also, the preview wouldn't load either when I tried to fix it manually! Anyway, I think I speak for the whole wiki when I say thanks!--50.99.241.181 16:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)