|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Animal article.
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
| |
The first animals were not the horses , There were by the time of the horse being released several animals with-in the DUPLO line as an example there have been 7 chickens released in Duplo, pictured below is one from 1979. Here for you reference is a list of Duplo animals http://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catString=420 , while not all the parts in this list are 1 piece animals the majority are Gladiatoring 22:23, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
- This list should either be in chronological or alphabetical, it seems like a mix at the moment. Kingcjc 19:54, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
- I think we should have a different page for duplo animals, and that any animal in this page should say when released in system form. —Unsigned comment by Golbolco (talk • contribs).
Pteranodon is NOT a dinosaur. —Unsigned comment by Golbolco (talk • contribs).
Sign your posts. Also, I would not exactly call it an animal, if so, Dinosaurs should be with animals as they are reptiles. Kingcjc 21:25, February 22, 2010 (UTC) What the heck happened to this page?
Animal Minifigure ?[]
I have never heard the term Minifigures releated to animals before , My way of thinking is the term Minifigure is exclusive term used only in describing LEGO people, Is there a reference for this term being used to describe animals ? Gladiatoring 19:59, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- It really depends on how you dissect the word, but I think that this could just be moved to Animal, or something. Ajraddatz Talk 20:06, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I would call it "Animal figure". --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 20:11, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Couldn't it stay as Animal :/ Kingcjc 20:12, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I Like "LEGO Animals" , but Animals or Animal Figures just as good , but it should be plural no ? as there are a lot more than one listed on the page Gladiatoring 20:15, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Couldn't it stay as Animal :/ Kingcjc 20:12, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I would call it "Animal figure". --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 20:11, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Per discussion, I have moved the page back to Animals. Ajraddatz Talk 20:57, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Moved back again by Ofelixdacat I removed it again , and he moved it back again, theres a lot of agains going on and I'm not fighting this war anymore. It seems as if consensus does not matter and how many Admins commented on this , well besides cjc who has a new marketing deal Gladiatoring 02:24, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Moved the page to "Animal figure" and protected it from further moves. Editing is still possible for anyone. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 06:52, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
- The category is animals and I prefer Animals in general. Animal Figures sounds like they are figurines. GG 360
11:05, April 7, 2010 (UTC) - I would also agree that the page was fine when it was animals. Kingcjc 11:45, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Article title[]
| The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was The page title should be "Animals"
Okay, let's have a vote for this. Everyone has one vote. No objections. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 12:33, April 7, 2010 (UTC) Animals
Animal minifigureAnimal figureSomething else |