FANDOM

 
34,653 Pages

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Harry Potter (Theme) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
The forum can be found here

Article policies

Expansion

This article covers an essential topic and needs additional information about the theme's characteristics, history and background.--LegOtaku (talk • contr) 06:22, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

Move?

Should we move this page to Harry Potter? Harry Potter already redirects here and a note that links to the minifigure is at the top. --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 14:34, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

I would of thought Harry Potter would of redirected since we name them like this :/ Kingcjc 17:49, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
I think it should stay, though I'm not really good with redirects that lead to other pages, ect. -Nerfblasterpro: It's Nerf, or Nothing!Maverick 23:57, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
I already moved Batman (Talk:Batman). --LegOtaku (talk • contr) 09:45, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
Ok, looks better actually. :) -Nerfblasterpro: It's Nerf, or Nothing!Maverick 17:40, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

The Burrow, 2 & 6

Though I must say that The Burrow really seems to be The Half-Blood Prince oriented, doesn't the inclusion of a Floo-powder Fireplace, which appeared in Chamber of Secrets, mean that the set would be classified under Multiple Subthemes? Thank you! --User:Berrybrick 18:07, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

LEGO references to other movies all the time. The Order of the Phoenix Hogwarts included mandrakes, even though they were not in that film. Lego lord 18:09, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

It's not like the Weasley's wouldn't lose their fireplace after the 2nd movie. They would have it for all time, and they would use it over and over again. It has appeared in all movies that had a scene at the Weasley's, even if it hasn't been used. So not really. It should stay where it is. --TheGrandEditor 18:10, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

The advertisements section looks completely terrible. You can only see half the screen of the 2010 advertisement. LEGO Lord Talk 13,497 Edits! ---- LEGO LOTR is coming! ---- reply back

Update Over?

If it has been decided that 4841, 4842, 4738, and 10217 are not based on a specific move, but contain allusions to several, shouldn't the banner be removed? (And on the note of 4728 it is based on both the first and the second, so I moved it to the multiple movie section.)--Berrybrick talk -- "Character Will Be Tested. . . ." 19:33, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Why are the 2010 - 2011 sets divided into subthemes that have only been guessed and not confirmed by TLG. It seems that most if not all of them are from a variety of movies and TLG never gave them a specified subtheme, shouldn't these ten sets, 4736, 4737, 4738, 4840, 4841, 4842, 10217, 4865, 4866 and 4867 be put in their own subtheme or left without a subtheme as TLg have given no official subtheme.

Probably, I'm not really an expert here... - Kingcjc 09:21, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.